Cultural and linguistic validation of the NHQ-2 Questionnaire: a specific instrument for assessing patient's usability of inhalation devices.

IF 2.3
Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine Pub Date : 2016-08-23 eCollection Date: 2016-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s40248-016-0067-y
Roberto W Dal Negro, Massimiliano Povero
{"title":"Cultural and linguistic validation of the NHQ-2 Questionnaire: a specific instrument for assessing patient's usability of inhalation devices.","authors":"Roberto W Dal Negro,&nbsp;Massimiliano Povero","doi":"10.1186/s40248-016-0067-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An increasing number of inhalation devices are presently available in the market. They are differently characterized in terms of their handling and usability, both factors which may affect the outcomes of respiratory treatment. The assessment of the preference and the usability rate of all devices can be carried out by means of specific questionnaires. Before their use, the identification of errors due to the incorrect wording of questions included in the questionnaires, together with the trans-cultural reliability represents the main issues of their cultural and linguistic validation.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>The New Handling Questionnaire - NHQ-2 is a novel specific questionnaire aimed to measure both the preference and the usability of all kinds of inhalation devices. The method used for its validation has been summarized in the first section of the present paper, while the results of the specific validation and translation process have been described in the second section, together with the grading of improvement achieved over the process. The comprehensibility and the reproducibility rates achieved for both the Italian and the English final versions of the NHQ-2 questionnaire were very high, such as >90 % for each question included.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The novel NHQ-2 questionnaire proved very high comprehensibility and reproducibility in both its Italian and English final versions. It can be proposed for the trans-cultural clinical use when the usability, and not only the patients' preference of devices, should be assessed.</p>","PeriodicalId":49031,"journal":{"name":"Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":"32"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40248-016-0067-y","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40248-016-0067-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: An increasing number of inhalation devices are presently available in the market. They are differently characterized in terms of their handling and usability, both factors which may affect the outcomes of respiratory treatment. The assessment of the preference and the usability rate of all devices can be carried out by means of specific questionnaires. Before their use, the identification of errors due to the incorrect wording of questions included in the questionnaires, together with the trans-cultural reliability represents the main issues of their cultural and linguistic validation.

Methods and results: The New Handling Questionnaire - NHQ-2 is a novel specific questionnaire aimed to measure both the preference and the usability of all kinds of inhalation devices. The method used for its validation has been summarized in the first section of the present paper, while the results of the specific validation and translation process have been described in the second section, together with the grading of improvement achieved over the process. The comprehensibility and the reproducibility rates achieved for both the Italian and the English final versions of the NHQ-2 questionnaire were very high, such as >90 % for each question included.

Conclusions: The novel NHQ-2 questionnaire proved very high comprehensibility and reproducibility in both its Italian and English final versions. It can be proposed for the trans-cultural clinical use when the usability, and not only the patients' preference of devices, should be assessed.

NHQ-2问卷的文化和语言验证:评估患者吸入装置可用性的特定工具。
背景:目前市场上有越来越多的吸入装置可供选择。它们在处理和可用性方面具有不同的特征,这两个因素都可能影响呼吸治疗的结果。对所有设备的偏好和可用性的评估可以通过具体的问卷进行。在使用问卷之前,对问卷中包含的问题措辞错误所导致的错误的识别,以及跨文化的信度是其文化和语言验证的主要问题。方法与结果:《新处理问卷- NHQ-2》是一份新型的专项问卷,旨在测量各类吸入装置的偏好和可用性。本文的第一部分总结了其验证方法,而第二部分描述了具体验证和翻译过程的结果,以及对该过程所取得的改进的分级。NHQ-2问卷的意大利语和英语定稿的可理解性和再现率都很高,每个问题的可理解性和再现率都> 90%。结论:新的NHQ-2问卷在意大利语和英语定稿中都具有很高的可理解性和可重复性。当评估设备的可用性,而不仅仅是患者对设备的偏好时,可以提出跨文化临床使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine
Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine is the official journal of the Italian Respiratory Society - Società Italiana di Pneumologia (IRS/SIP). The journal publishes on all aspects of respiratory medicine and related fields, with a particular focus on interdisciplinary and translational research. The interdisciplinary nature of the journal provides a unique opportunity for researchers, clinicians and healthcare professionals across specialties to collaborate and exchange information. The journal provides a high visibility platform for the publication and dissemination of top quality original scientific articles, reviews and important position papers documenting clinical and experimental advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信