{"title":"Sem analysis zirconia-ceramic adhesion interface.","authors":"P Cardelli, V Vertucci, M Montani, C Arcuri","doi":"10.11138/orl/2015.8.2.052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Modern dentistry increasingly tends to use materials aesthetically acceptable and biomimetic. Among these are zirconia and ceramics for several years, a combination that now has becoming synonym of aesthetic; however, what could be the real link between these two materials and especially its nature, remains a controversial topic debated in the literature. The aim of our study was to \"underline\" the type of bonding that could exist between these materials.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>To investigate the nature of this bond we used a SEM microscopy (Zeiss SUPRA 25). Different bilaminar specimens: \"white\" zirconia Zircodent® and ceramic \"Noritake®\", after being tested with loading test in bending (three-point-bending) and FEM analysis, were analyzed by SEM. Fragments' analysis in closeness of the fracture's point has allowed us to be able to \"see\" if at large magnifications between these two materials, and without the use of linear, could exist a lasting bond and the possible type of failure that could incur.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From our analysis of the specimens' fragments analyzed after test Equipment, it is difficult to highlight a clear margin and no-adhesion zones between the two materials, although the analysis involving fragments adjacent to the fracture that has taken place at the time of Mechanical test Equipment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to our analysis and with all the clarification of the case, we can assume that you can obtain a long and lasting bond between the zirconia and ceramics. Agree to the data present in the literature, we can say that the type of bond varies according to the type of specimens and of course also the type of failure. In samples where the superstructure envelops the ceramic framework Zirconium we are in the presence of a cohesive failure, otherwise in a presence of adhesive failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":38303,"journal":{"name":"ORAL and Implantology","volume":"8 2-3","pages":"52-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4969731/pdf/52-62.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ORAL and Implantology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11138/orl/2015.8.2.052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Modern dentistry increasingly tends to use materials aesthetically acceptable and biomimetic. Among these are zirconia and ceramics for several years, a combination that now has becoming synonym of aesthetic; however, what could be the real link between these two materials and especially its nature, remains a controversial topic debated in the literature. The aim of our study was to "underline" the type of bonding that could exist between these materials.
Materials and methods: To investigate the nature of this bond we used a SEM microscopy (Zeiss SUPRA 25). Different bilaminar specimens: "white" zirconia Zircodent® and ceramic "Noritake®", after being tested with loading test in bending (three-point-bending) and FEM analysis, were analyzed by SEM. Fragments' analysis in closeness of the fracture's point has allowed us to be able to "see" if at large magnifications between these two materials, and without the use of linear, could exist a lasting bond and the possible type of failure that could incur.
Results: From our analysis of the specimens' fragments analyzed after test Equipment, it is difficult to highlight a clear margin and no-adhesion zones between the two materials, although the analysis involving fragments adjacent to the fracture that has taken place at the time of Mechanical test Equipment.
Conclusions: According to our analysis and with all the clarification of the case, we can assume that you can obtain a long and lasting bond between the zirconia and ceramics. Agree to the data present in the literature, we can say that the type of bond varies according to the type of specimens and of course also the type of failure. In samples where the superstructure envelops the ceramic framework Zirconium we are in the presence of a cohesive failure, otherwise in a presence of adhesive failure.
目的:现代牙科越来越倾向于使用美学上可接受的仿生物材料。然而,这两种材料之间的真正联系是什么,尤其是其性质,在文献中仍是一个有争议的话题。我们的研究旨在 "强调 "这两种材料之间可能存在的粘合类型:为了研究这种结合的性质,我们使用了 SEM 显微镜(Zeiss SUPRA 25)。不同的双层试样:"白色 "氧化锆 Zircodent® 和陶瓷 "Noritake®"在经过弯曲加载测试(三点弯曲)和有限元分析后,用 SEM 进行了分析。通过对断裂点附近的碎片进行分析,我们可以 "看到 "这两种材料之间在不使用线性材料的情况下,在放大镜下是否存在持久的粘结力,以及可能出现的失效类型:从我们对试验设备后分析的试样碎片的分析来看,很难在两种材料之间突出明显的边缘和无粘着区,尽管分析涉及的碎片与机械试验设备时发生的断裂相邻:根据我们的分析和对所有情况的说明,我们可以认为氧化锆和陶瓷之间可以获得长期持久的粘结。与文献中的数据一致,我们可以说,粘接类型因试样类型而异,当然也因失效类型而异。在上层结构包覆锆陶瓷框架的试样中,我们看到的是内聚失效,否则就是粘合失效。