Pilot study: assessing the clinical diagnosis of allergy in atopic children using a microarray assay in addition to skin prick testing and serum specific IgE.

Q2 Medicine
Clinical and Molecular Allergy Pub Date : 2016-08-19 eCollection Date: 2016-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s12948-016-0046-z
Ru-Xin Foong, Graham Roberts, Adam Tobias Fox, George du Toit
{"title":"Pilot study: assessing the clinical diagnosis of allergy in atopic children using a microarray assay in addition to skin prick testing and serum specific IgE.","authors":"Ru-Xin Foong,&nbsp;Graham Roberts,&nbsp;Adam Tobias Fox,&nbsp;George du Toit","doi":"10.1186/s12948-016-0046-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children with atopic dermatitis (AD) are at risk of developing allergy. Alongside clinical history, testing modalities include skin prick tests (SPT), specific immunoglobulin-E (sp-IgE) and recently, microarray assays. The aim of this pilot study was to assess current tests and the ISAC sIgE-112 system in the diagnosis of food and aeroallergen allergy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Children aged 0-11 years with moderate to severe AD were included. An initial allergy assessment including clinical history, SPT and sp-IgE was performed to determine food and aeroallergen sensitization. A second independent clinical assessment using the same information given to the first assessor and ISAC test results for food and aeroallergen sensitization was also made for each participant. The results from both were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>30 children [mean age 3.91 years (SD 3.3)] were included; 53.3 and 46.7 % had moderate and severe AD, respectively. Sp-IgE tests had a higher percentage of positive results compared to SPT and ISAC tests for common allergens. There was a significant difference between the three tests in detecting aeroallergen sensitization (p = 0.038), especially between sp-IgE and ISAC tests, but no significant difference between the tests for food allergen sensitization. There was good agreement between the two assessors; 70 % of the children had a change in diagnosis, with 60 % having at least one diagnosis added and 40 % having at least one diagnosis removed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a role for the use of ISAC testing in diagnosing sensitization and allergy in children with AD as it leads to a change in diagnosis for many patients. Further work is required to assess its clinical and cost effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":38753,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Molecular Allergy","volume":"14 ","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12948-016-0046-z","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Molecular Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12948-016-0046-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Background: Children with atopic dermatitis (AD) are at risk of developing allergy. Alongside clinical history, testing modalities include skin prick tests (SPT), specific immunoglobulin-E (sp-IgE) and recently, microarray assays. The aim of this pilot study was to assess current tests and the ISAC sIgE-112 system in the diagnosis of food and aeroallergen allergy.

Methods: Children aged 0-11 years with moderate to severe AD were included. An initial allergy assessment including clinical history, SPT and sp-IgE was performed to determine food and aeroallergen sensitization. A second independent clinical assessment using the same information given to the first assessor and ISAC test results for food and aeroallergen sensitization was also made for each participant. The results from both were compared.

Results: 30 children [mean age 3.91 years (SD 3.3)] were included; 53.3 and 46.7 % had moderate and severe AD, respectively. Sp-IgE tests had a higher percentage of positive results compared to SPT and ISAC tests for common allergens. There was a significant difference between the three tests in detecting aeroallergen sensitization (p = 0.038), especially between sp-IgE and ISAC tests, but no significant difference between the tests for food allergen sensitization. There was good agreement between the two assessors; 70 % of the children had a change in diagnosis, with 60 % having at least one diagnosis added and 40 % having at least one diagnosis removed.

Conclusions: There is a role for the use of ISAC testing in diagnosing sensitization and allergy in children with AD as it leads to a change in diagnosis for many patients. Further work is required to assess its clinical and cost effectiveness.

Abstract Image

试点研究:除皮肤点刺试验和血清特异性IgE外,使用微阵列分析评估特应性儿童过敏的临床诊断。
背景:患有特应性皮炎(AD)的儿童有发生过敏的风险。除了临床病史,测试方式包括皮肤点刺试验(SPT),特异性免疫球蛋白e (sp-IgE)和最近的微阵列分析。本初步研究的目的是评估目前的测试和ISAC sIgE-112系统在诊断食物和空气过敏原过敏方面的作用。方法:选取0 ~ 11岁中重度AD患儿为研究对象。初步过敏评估包括临床病史、SPT和sp-IgE,以确定食物和空气过敏原的致敏性。对每个参与者进行第二次独立临床评估,使用与第一次评估人员相同的信息和食物和空气过敏原致敏的ISAC测试结果。比较了两者的结果。结果:纳入30例儿童[平均年龄3.91岁(SD 3.3)];中度AD占53.3%,重度AD占46.7%。与常见过敏原的SPT和ISAC测试相比,Sp-IgE测试的阳性结果百分比更高。三种方法对空气过敏原致敏性的检测差异有统计学意义(p = 0.038),特别是sp-IgE和ISAC试验对食物过敏原致敏性的检测差异无统计学意义(p = 0.038)。两位评估师意见很一致;70%的儿童的诊断发生了变化,60%的儿童至少增加了一项诊断,40%的儿童至少删除了一项诊断。结论:ISAC检测在诊断AD患儿致敏性和过敏方面具有一定的作用,因为它导致了许多患者诊断的改变。需要进一步的工作来评估其临床和成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical and Molecular Allergy
Clinical and Molecular Allergy Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Molecular Allergy is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that publishes research on human allergic and immunodeficient disease (immune deficiency not related to HIV infection/AIDS). The scope of the journal encompasses all aspects of the clinical, genetic, molecular and inflammatory aspects of allergic-respiratory (Type 1 hypersensitivity) and non-AIDS immunodeficiency disorders. However, studies of allergic/hypersensitive aspects of HIV infection/AIDS or drug desensitization protocols in AIDS are acceptable. At the basic science level, this includes original work and reviews on the genetic and molecular mechanisms underlying the inflammatory response.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信