Defining and Measuring Safety Climate: A Review of the Construction Industry Literature.

Annals of Occupational Hygiene Pub Date : 2016-06-01 Epub Date: 2016-04-19 DOI:10.1093/annhyg/mew020
Natalie V Schwatka, Steven Hecker, Linda M Goldenhar
{"title":"Defining and Measuring Safety Climate: A Review of the Construction Industry Literature.","authors":"Natalie V Schwatka, Steven Hecker, Linda M Goldenhar","doi":"10.1093/annhyg/mew020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Safety climate measurements can be used to proactively assess an organization's effectiveness in identifying and remediating work-related hazards, thereby reducing or preventing work-related ill health and injury. This review article focuses on construction-specific articles that developed and/or measured safety climate, assessed safety climate's relationship with other safety and health performance indicators, and/or used safety climate measures to evaluate interventions targeting one or more indicators of safety climate. Fifty-six articles met our inclusion criteria, 80% of which were published after 2008. Our findings demonstrate that researchers commonly defined safety climate as perception based, but the object of those perceptions varies widely. Within the wide range of indicators used to measure safety climate, safety policies, procedures, and practices were the most common, followed by general management commitment to safety. The most frequently used indicators should and do reflect that the prevention of work-related ill health and injury depends on both organizational and employee actions. Safety climate scores were commonly compared between groups (e.g. management and workers, different trades), and often correlated with subjective measures of safety behavior rather than measures of ill health or objective safety and health outcomes. Despite the observed limitations of current research, safety climate has been promised as a useful feature of research and practice activities to prevent work-related ill health and injury. Safety climate survey data can reveal gaps between management and employee perceptions, or between espoused and enacted policies, and trigger communication and action to narrow those gaps. The validation of safety climate with safety and health performance data offers the potential for using safety climate measures as a leading indicator of performance. We discuss these findings in relation to the related concept of safety culture and offer suggestions for future research and practice including (i) deriving a common definition of safety climate, (ii) developing and testing construction-specific indicators of safety climate, and (iii) focusing on construction-specific issues such as the transient workforce, subcontracting, work organization, and induction/acculturation processes. </p>","PeriodicalId":8458,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Occupational Hygiene","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7778735/pdf/nihms-1651942.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Occupational Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mew020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/4/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Safety climate measurements can be used to proactively assess an organization's effectiveness in identifying and remediating work-related hazards, thereby reducing or preventing work-related ill health and injury. This review article focuses on construction-specific articles that developed and/or measured safety climate, assessed safety climate's relationship with other safety and health performance indicators, and/or used safety climate measures to evaluate interventions targeting one or more indicators of safety climate. Fifty-six articles met our inclusion criteria, 80% of which were published after 2008. Our findings demonstrate that researchers commonly defined safety climate as perception based, but the object of those perceptions varies widely. Within the wide range of indicators used to measure safety climate, safety policies, procedures, and practices were the most common, followed by general management commitment to safety. The most frequently used indicators should and do reflect that the prevention of work-related ill health and injury depends on both organizational and employee actions. Safety climate scores were commonly compared between groups (e.g. management and workers, different trades), and often correlated with subjective measures of safety behavior rather than measures of ill health or objective safety and health outcomes. Despite the observed limitations of current research, safety climate has been promised as a useful feature of research and practice activities to prevent work-related ill health and injury. Safety climate survey data can reveal gaps between management and employee perceptions, or between espoused and enacted policies, and trigger communication and action to narrow those gaps. The validation of safety climate with safety and health performance data offers the potential for using safety climate measures as a leading indicator of performance. We discuss these findings in relation to the related concept of safety culture and offer suggestions for future research and practice including (i) deriving a common definition of safety climate, (ii) developing and testing construction-specific indicators of safety climate, and (iii) focusing on construction-specific issues such as the transient workforce, subcontracting, work organization, and induction/acculturation processes.

Abstract Image

定义和衡量安全氛围:建筑行业文献综述。
安全氛围测量可用于主动评估一个组织在识别和纠正工作相关危害方面的有效性,从而减少或预防工作相关的疾病和伤害。本综述文章主要关注建筑行业的文章,这些文章制定和/或测量了安全氛围,评估了安全氛围与其他安全和健康绩效指标的关系,和/或使用安全氛围测量方法评估了针对一个或多个安全氛围指标的干预措施。有 56 篇文章符合我们的纳入标准,其中 80% 的文章发表于 2008 年之后。我们的研究结果表明,研究人员通常将安全氛围定义为基于感知的氛围,但这些感知的对象却千差万别。在用于衡量安全氛围的各种指标中,安全政策、程序和实践最为常见,其次是管理层对安全的总体承诺。最常用的指标应该也确实反映出,预防与工作有关的疾病和伤害取决于组织和雇员的行动。安全氛围评分通常是在不同群体(如管理层和工人、不同行业)之间进行比较,而且往往与安全行为的主观衡量标准相关,而不是与健康不良或客观安全和健康结果的衡量标准相关。尽管目前的研究还存在一些局限性,但安全氛围已被认为是预防与工作有关的健康不良和工伤的研究和实践活动的一个有用特征。安全氛围调查数据可以揭示管理层与员工认知之间的差距,或所拥护的政策与所颁布的政策之间的差距,并引发沟通和行动,以缩小这些差距。安全氛围与安全和健康绩效数据的验证为将安全氛围措施作为绩效的先行指标提供了可能。我们结合安全文化的相关概念讨论了这些研究结果,并对未来的研究和实践提出了建议,包括:(i) 得出安全氛围的通用定义;(ii) 开发和测试建筑业特有的安全氛围指标;(iii) 关注建筑业特有的问题,如流动劳动力、分包、工作组织和上岗/适应过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信