Young Joon Moon, Hong-Wook Kim, Jin Bum Kim, Hyung Joon Kim, Young-Seop Chang
{"title":"Distribution of ureteral stones and factors affecting their location and expulsion in patients with renal colic.","authors":"Young Joon Moon, Hong-Wook Kim, Jin Bum Kim, Hyung Joon Kim, Young-Seop Chang","doi":"10.4111/kju.2015.56.10.717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the distribution of ureteral stones and to determine their characteristics and expulsion rate based on their location.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed computed tomography (CT) findings of 246 patients who visited our Emergency Department (ED) for renal colic caused by unilateral ureteral stones between January 2013 and April 2014. Histograms were constructed to plot the distribution of stones based on initial CT findings. Data from 144 of the 246 patients who underwent medical expulsive therapy (MET) for 2 weeks were analyzed to evaluate the factors responsible for the stone distribution and expulsion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The upper ureter and ureterovesical junction (UVJ) were 2 peak locations at which stones initially lodged. Stones lodged at the upper ureter and ureteropelvic junction (group A) had a larger longitudinal diameter (4.21 mm vs. 3.56 mm, p=0.004) compared to those lodged at the lower ureter and UVJ (group B). The expulsion rate was 75.6% and 94.9% in groups A and B, respectively. There was no significant difference in the time interval from initiation of renal colic to arrival at the ED between groups A and B (p=0.422). Stone diameter was a significant predictor of MET failure (odds ratio [OR], 1.795; p=0.005) but the initial stone location was not (OR, 0.299; p=0.082).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The upper ureter and UVJ are 2 peak sites at which stones lodge. For stone size 10 mm or less, initial stone lodge site is not a significant predictor of MET failure in patients who have no previous history of active stone treatment in the ureter.</p>","PeriodicalId":17819,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Urology","volume":"56 10","pages":"717-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4111/kju.2015.56.10.717","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2015.56.10.717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/10/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the distribution of ureteral stones and to determine their characteristics and expulsion rate based on their location.
Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed computed tomography (CT) findings of 246 patients who visited our Emergency Department (ED) for renal colic caused by unilateral ureteral stones between January 2013 and April 2014. Histograms were constructed to plot the distribution of stones based on initial CT findings. Data from 144 of the 246 patients who underwent medical expulsive therapy (MET) for 2 weeks were analyzed to evaluate the factors responsible for the stone distribution and expulsion.
Results: The upper ureter and ureterovesical junction (UVJ) were 2 peak locations at which stones initially lodged. Stones lodged at the upper ureter and ureteropelvic junction (group A) had a larger longitudinal diameter (4.21 mm vs. 3.56 mm, p=0.004) compared to those lodged at the lower ureter and UVJ (group B). The expulsion rate was 75.6% and 94.9% in groups A and B, respectively. There was no significant difference in the time interval from initiation of renal colic to arrival at the ED between groups A and B (p=0.422). Stone diameter was a significant predictor of MET failure (odds ratio [OR], 1.795; p=0.005) but the initial stone location was not (OR, 0.299; p=0.082).
Conclusions: The upper ureter and UVJ are 2 peak sites at which stones lodge. For stone size 10 mm or less, initial stone lodge site is not a significant predictor of MET failure in patients who have no previous history of active stone treatment in the ureter.
目的:评估输尿管结石的分布,根据其位置确定其特征和排结石率。材料和方法:我们回顾性分析了2013年1月至2014年4月期间因单侧输尿管结石引起肾绞痛就诊的246例急诊科患者的计算机断层扫描(CT)表现。根据最初的CT表现构建直方图来绘制结石的分布。246例接受医学排出治疗(MET) 2周的患者中有144例的数据被分析,以评估导致结石分布和排出的因素。结果:输尿管上段和输尿管膀胱交界处(UVJ)是结石最初堆积的两个高峰位置。在输尿管上段和肾盂输尿管连接处的结石(A组)比在输尿管下段和UVJ处的结石(B组)具有更大的纵向直径(4.21 mm vs. 3.56 mm, p=0.004)。A组和B组的排出率分别为75.6%和94.9%。A组和B组从肾绞痛开始到到达ED的时间间隔无显著差异(p=0.422)。结石直径是MET失败的显著预测因子(优势比[OR], 1.795;p=0.005),但最初的结石位置没有(OR, 0.299;p = 0.082)。结论:输尿管上段和UVJ是结石发生的两个高峰部位。对于结石尺寸小于等于10mm的患者,对于没有输尿管结石治疗史的患者,初始结石放置位置并不是MET失败的重要预测因素。