Characterization of Virulence-Related Phenotypes in Candida Species of the CUG Clade.

Eukaryotic Cell Pub Date : 2015-09-01 Epub Date: 2015-07-06 DOI:10.1128/EC.00062-15
Shelby J Priest, Michael C Lorenz
{"title":"Characterization of Virulence-Related Phenotypes in Candida Species of the CUG Clade.","authors":"Shelby J Priest,&nbsp;Michael C Lorenz","doi":"10.1128/EC.00062-15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Candida species cause a variety of mucosal and invasive infections and are, collectively, the most important human fungal pathogens in the developed world. The majority of these infections result from a few related species within the \"CUG clade,\" so named because they use a nonstandard translation for that codon. Some members of the CUG clade, such as Candida albicans, present significant clinical problems, whereas others, such as Candida (Meyerozyma) guilliermondii, are uncommon in patients. The differences in incidence rates are imperfectly correlated with virulence in animal models of infection, but comparative analyses that might provide an explanation for why some species are effective pathogens and others are not have been rare or incomplete. To better understand the phenotypic basis for these differences, we characterized eight CUG clade species--C. albicans, C. dubliniensis, C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis, Clavispora lusitaniae, M. guilliermondii, Debaryomyces hansenii, and Lodderomyces elongisporus--for host-relevant phenotypes, including nutrient utilization, stress tolerance, morphogenesis, interactions with phagocytes, and biofilm formation. Two species deviated from expectations based on animal studies and human incidence. C. dubliniensis was quite robust, grouping in nearly all assays with the most virulent species, C. albicans and C. tropicalis, whereas C. parapsilosis was substantially less fit than might be expected from its clinical importance. These findings confirm the utility of in vitro measures of virulence and provide insight into the evolution of virulence in the CUG clade.</p>","PeriodicalId":11891,"journal":{"name":"Eukaryotic Cell","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1128/EC.00062-15","citationCount":"41","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eukaryotic Cell","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/EC.00062-15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/7/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

Abstract

Candida species cause a variety of mucosal and invasive infections and are, collectively, the most important human fungal pathogens in the developed world. The majority of these infections result from a few related species within the "CUG clade," so named because they use a nonstandard translation for that codon. Some members of the CUG clade, such as Candida albicans, present significant clinical problems, whereas others, such as Candida (Meyerozyma) guilliermondii, are uncommon in patients. The differences in incidence rates are imperfectly correlated with virulence in animal models of infection, but comparative analyses that might provide an explanation for why some species are effective pathogens and others are not have been rare or incomplete. To better understand the phenotypic basis for these differences, we characterized eight CUG clade species--C. albicans, C. dubliniensis, C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis, Clavispora lusitaniae, M. guilliermondii, Debaryomyces hansenii, and Lodderomyces elongisporus--for host-relevant phenotypes, including nutrient utilization, stress tolerance, morphogenesis, interactions with phagocytes, and biofilm formation. Two species deviated from expectations based on animal studies and human incidence. C. dubliniensis was quite robust, grouping in nearly all assays with the most virulent species, C. albicans and C. tropicalis, whereas C. parapsilosis was substantially less fit than might be expected from its clinical importance. These findings confirm the utility of in vitro measures of virulence and provide insight into the evolution of virulence in the CUG clade.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

CUG支系念珠菌种毒力相关表型的研究。
念珠菌引起多种粘膜和侵袭性感染,是发达国家最重要的人类真菌病原体。这些感染大多来自“CUG分支”中的几个相关物种,之所以如此命名是因为它们使用非标准的密码子翻译。CUG分支的一些成员,如白色念珠菌,表现出明显的临床问题,而其他成员,如假丝菌(Meyerozyma) guillimondii,在患者中并不常见。在感染的动物模型中,发病率的差异与毒力并不完全相关,但可能提供解释为什么有些物种是有效病原体而其他物种不是的比较分析很少或不完整。为了更好地理解这些差异的表型基础,我们对8个CUG分支物种进行了表征。白色念珠菌、dubliniensis、C. tropicalis、C. parapsilosis、Clavispora lusitaniae、M. guilliermondii、Debaryomyces hansenii和Lodderomyces elongisporus——用于宿主相关表型,包括营养利用、胁迫耐受性、形态发生、与吞噬细胞相互作用和生物膜形成。两个物种偏离了基于动物研究和人类发病率的预期。C. dubliniensis是相当健壮的,在几乎所有的分析中与最毒的物种,C.白色念珠菌和C.热带念珠菌分组,而C. parapsilosis基本上不适合从其临床重要性预期。这些发现证实了体外毒力测量的实用性,并为CUG分支的毒力进化提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Eukaryotic Cell
Eukaryotic Cell 生物-微生物学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Eukaryotic Cell (EC) focuses on eukaryotic microbiology and presents reports of basic research on simple eukaryotic microorganisms, such as yeasts, fungi, algae, protozoa, and social amoebae. The journal also covers viruses of these organisms and their organelles and their interactions with other living systems, where the focus is on the eukaryotic cell. Topics include: - Basic biology - Molecular and cellular biology - Mechanisms, and control, of developmental pathways - Structure and form inherent in basic biological processes - Cellular architecture - Metabolic physiology - Comparative genomics, biochemistry, and evolution - Population dynamics - Ecology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信