Does Intensive Glucose Control Prevent Cognitive Decline in Diabetes? A Meta-Analysis.

International Journal of Chronic Diseases Pub Date : 2015-01-01 Epub Date: 2015-08-04 DOI:10.1155/2015/680104
Carlos Peñaherrera-Oviedo, Daniel Moreno-Zambrano, Michael Palacios, María Carolina Duarte-Martinez, Carlos Cevallos, Ximena Gamboa, María Beatriz Jurado, Leonardo Tamariz, Ana Palacio, Rocío Santibañez
{"title":"Does Intensive Glucose Control Prevent Cognitive Decline in Diabetes? A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Carlos Peñaherrera-Oviedo,&nbsp;Daniel Moreno-Zambrano,&nbsp;Michael Palacios,&nbsp;María Carolina Duarte-Martinez,&nbsp;Carlos Cevallos,&nbsp;Ximena Gamboa,&nbsp;María Beatriz Jurado,&nbsp;Leonardo Tamariz,&nbsp;Ana Palacio,&nbsp;Rocío Santibañez","doi":"10.1155/2015/680104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diabetes mellitus is associated with cognitive decline and impaired performance in cognitive function tests among type 1 and type 2 diabetics. Even though the use of tight glucose control has been limited by a reported higher mortality, few reports have assessed the impact of treatment intensity on cognitive function. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate if an intensive glucose control in diabetes improves cognitive function, in comparison to standard therapy. We included 7 studies that included type 1 or type 2 diabetics and used standardized tests to evaluate various cognitive function domains. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated for each domain. We found that type 1 diabetics get no cognitive benefit from a tight glucose control, whereas type 2 diabetics get some benefit on processing speed and executive domains but had worse performances in the memory and attention domains, along with a higher incidence of mortality when using intensive glucose control regimes. </p>","PeriodicalId":13831,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chronic Diseases","volume":"2015 ","pages":"680104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2015/680104","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chronic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/680104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus is associated with cognitive decline and impaired performance in cognitive function tests among type 1 and type 2 diabetics. Even though the use of tight glucose control has been limited by a reported higher mortality, few reports have assessed the impact of treatment intensity on cognitive function. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate if an intensive glucose control in diabetes improves cognitive function, in comparison to standard therapy. We included 7 studies that included type 1 or type 2 diabetics and used standardized tests to evaluate various cognitive function domains. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated for each domain. We found that type 1 diabetics get no cognitive benefit from a tight glucose control, whereas type 2 diabetics get some benefit on processing speed and executive domains but had worse performances in the memory and attention domains, along with a higher incidence of mortality when using intensive glucose control regimes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

强化血糖控制能预防糖尿病患者认知能力下降吗?一个荟萃分析。
在1型和2型糖尿病患者中,糖尿病与认知能力下降和认知功能测试中的表现受损有关。尽管严格血糖控制的使用受到较高死亡率的限制,但很少有报道评估治疗强度对认知功能的影响。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估与标准治疗相比,糖尿病患者强化血糖控制是否能改善认知功能。我们纳入了7项研究,其中包括1型或2型糖尿病患者,并使用标准化测试来评估各种认知功能领域。计算每个域的标准化平均差异(SMDs)。我们发现,1型糖尿病患者在严格的血糖控制中没有获得认知方面的好处,而2型糖尿病患者在处理速度和执行领域得到一些好处,但在记忆和注意力领域的表现更差,并且在使用强化血糖控制制度时死亡率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信