Reducing Sun Exposure for Prevention of Skin Cancers: Factorial Invariance and Reliability of the Self-Efficacy Scale for Sun Protection.

IF 1.2 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Journal of Skin Cancer Pub Date : 2015-01-01 Epub Date: 2015-09-17 DOI:10.1155/2015/862732
Steven F Babbin, Hui-Qing Yin, Joseph S Rossi, Colleen A Redding, Andrea L Paiva, Wayne F Velicer
{"title":"Reducing Sun Exposure for Prevention of Skin Cancers: Factorial Invariance and Reliability of the Self-Efficacy Scale for Sun Protection.","authors":"Steven F Babbin,&nbsp;Hui-Qing Yin,&nbsp;Joseph S Rossi,&nbsp;Colleen A Redding,&nbsp;Andrea L Paiva,&nbsp;Wayne F Velicer","doi":"10.1155/2015/862732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Self-Efficacy Scale for Sun Protection consists of two correlated factors with three items each for Sunscreen Use and Avoidance. This study evaluated two crucial psychometric assumptions, factorial invariance and scale reliability, with a sample of adults (N = 1356) participating in a computer-tailored, population-based intervention study. A measure has factorial invariance when the model is the same across subgroups. Three levels of invariance were tested, from least to most restrictive: (1) Configural Invariance (nonzero factor loadings unconstrained); (2) Pattern Identity Invariance (equal factor loadings); and (3) Strong Factorial Invariance (equal factor loadings and measurement errors). Strong Factorial Invariance was a good fit for the model across seven grouping variables: age, education, ethnicity, gender, race, skin tone, and Stage of Change for Sun Protection. Internal consistency coefficient Alpha and factor rho scale reliability, respectively, were .84 and .86 for Sunscreen Use, .68 and .70 for Avoidance, and .78 and .78 for the global (total) scale. The psychometric evidence demonstrates strong empirical support that the scale is consistent, has internal validity, and can be used to assess population-based adult samples. </p>","PeriodicalId":17172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Skin Cancer","volume":"2015 ","pages":"862732"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2015/862732","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Skin Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/862732","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/9/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The Self-Efficacy Scale for Sun Protection consists of two correlated factors with three items each for Sunscreen Use and Avoidance. This study evaluated two crucial psychometric assumptions, factorial invariance and scale reliability, with a sample of adults (N = 1356) participating in a computer-tailored, population-based intervention study. A measure has factorial invariance when the model is the same across subgroups. Three levels of invariance were tested, from least to most restrictive: (1) Configural Invariance (nonzero factor loadings unconstrained); (2) Pattern Identity Invariance (equal factor loadings); and (3) Strong Factorial Invariance (equal factor loadings and measurement errors). Strong Factorial Invariance was a good fit for the model across seven grouping variables: age, education, ethnicity, gender, race, skin tone, and Stage of Change for Sun Protection. Internal consistency coefficient Alpha and factor rho scale reliability, respectively, were .84 and .86 for Sunscreen Use, .68 and .70 for Avoidance, and .78 and .78 for the global (total) scale. The psychometric evidence demonstrates strong empirical support that the scale is consistent, has internal validity, and can be used to assess population-based adult samples.

Abstract Image

减少日晒预防皮肤癌:防晒自我效能量表的因子不变性和可靠性。
防晒自我效能量表由两个相关因素组成,使用防晒霜和避免防晒霜各有三个项目。本研究评估了两个关键的心理测量假设,因子不变性和量表可靠性,参与计算机定制的基于人群的干预研究的成人样本(N = 1356)。当模型跨子组相同时,度量具有阶乘不变性。从限制最少到限制最多,测试了三个层次的不变性:(1)配置不变性(非零因子负载无约束);(2)模式恒等不变性(等因子负载);(3)强因子不变性(相等的因子负荷和测量误差)。强因子不变性很好地适应了七个分组变量的模型:年龄、教育程度、种族、性别、种族、肤色和防晒变化阶段。防晒霜使用的内部一致性系数Alpha和因子rho量表信度分别为0.84和0.86,避免使用的内部一致性系数Alpha和因子rho量表信度分别为0.68和0.70,全球(总)量表的内部一致性系数Alpha和因子rho量表信度分别为0.78和0.78。心理测量证据表明,该量表具有一致性,具有内部效度,可用于评估基于人群的成人样本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Skin Cancer
Journal of Skin Cancer DERMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
12
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Skin Cancer is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes clinical and translational research on the detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of skin malignancies. The journal encourages the submission of original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to pathology, prognostic indicators and biomarkers, novel therapies, as well as drug sensitivity and resistance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信