{"title":"CHEMICAL REACTIONS AS <i>PETITE RENDEZVOUS</i>: THE USE OF METAPHOR IN MATERIALS SCIENCE EDUCATION.","authors":"Vuk Uskoković","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Every time we communicate our science, we are involuntarily involved in an educational activity, affecting the listeners' methodology and motivation. In a beautiful metaphor, late Nobel Laureate, Richard E. Smalley compared interacting atoms and molecules to boys and girls falling in love. Elaborated and exemplified with a couple of entertaining analogies in this discourse is the effectiveness of the use of metaphors in illustrating scientific concepts to both scientific novices and peers. Human brain has been considered to be a complex neural circuitry for the computation of metaphors, which explains the naturalness of their usage, especially when solid arguments could be given in support of the thesis that scientific imagery in general presents a collection of mathematically operable metaphors. On top of this, knowledge could be enriched through logic alone, but new concepts could be learned only through analogies. The greater pervasion of metaphors in scientific presentations could boost their inspirational potential, make the audience more attentive and receptive to their contents, and, finally, expand their educational prospect and enable their outreach to a far broader audience than it has been generally accomplished.</p>","PeriodicalId":49033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Materials Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4593332/pdf/nihms678198.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Materials Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Every time we communicate our science, we are involuntarily involved in an educational activity, affecting the listeners' methodology and motivation. In a beautiful metaphor, late Nobel Laureate, Richard E. Smalley compared interacting atoms and molecules to boys and girls falling in love. Elaborated and exemplified with a couple of entertaining analogies in this discourse is the effectiveness of the use of metaphors in illustrating scientific concepts to both scientific novices and peers. Human brain has been considered to be a complex neural circuitry for the computation of metaphors, which explains the naturalness of their usage, especially when solid arguments could be given in support of the thesis that scientific imagery in general presents a collection of mathematically operable metaphors. On top of this, knowledge could be enriched through logic alone, but new concepts could be learned only through analogies. The greater pervasion of metaphors in scientific presentations could boost their inspirational potential, make the audience more attentive and receptive to their contents, and, finally, expand their educational prospect and enable their outreach to a far broader audience than it has been generally accomplished.
每当我们进行科学传播时,我们都不由自主地参与了一项教育活动,影响着听众的方法和动机。已故诺贝尔奖获得者理查德-E-斯马利(Richard E. Smalley)曾用一个美丽的比喻将相互作用的原子和分子比作坠入爱河的男孩和女孩。在这篇论述中,他用几个有趣的比喻详细阐述和举例说明了使用比喻向科学新手和同行说明科学概念的有效性。人脑被认为是一个计算隐喻的复杂神经回路,这就解释了隐喻使用的自然性,尤其是当我们可以提出坚实的论据来支持这样一个论点,即科学意象总体上呈现出数学上可操作的隐喻集合。此外,知识可以通过逻辑来丰富,但新概念只能通过类比来学习。在科学演讲中更多地使用隐喻可以提高其启发性潜力,使听众更专注于和更容易接受其内容,最终扩大其教育前景,使其能够向比一般情况下更广泛的受众推广。