Simple and Objective Prediction of Survival in Patients with Lung Cancer: Staging the Host Systemic Inflammatory Response.

Lung cancer international Pub Date : 2014-01-01 Epub Date: 2014-03-05 DOI:10.1155/2014/731925
Derek Grose, Graham Devereux, Louise Brown, Richard Jones, Dave Sharma, Colin Selby, David S Morrison, Kirsty Docherty, David McIntosh, Penny McElhinney, Marianne Nicolson, Donald C McMillan, Robert Milroy
{"title":"Simple and Objective Prediction of Survival in Patients with Lung Cancer: Staging the Host Systemic Inflammatory Response.","authors":"Derek Grose,&nbsp;Graham Devereux,&nbsp;Louise Brown,&nbsp;Richard Jones,&nbsp;Dave Sharma,&nbsp;Colin Selby,&nbsp;David S Morrison,&nbsp;Kirsty Docherty,&nbsp;David McIntosh,&nbsp;Penny McElhinney,&nbsp;Marianne Nicolson,&nbsp;Donald C McMillan,&nbsp;Robert Milroy","doi":"10.1155/2014/731925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background. Prediction of survival in patients diagnosed with lung cancer remains problematical. The aim of the present study was to examine the clinical utility of an established objective marker of the systemic inflammatory response, the Glasgow Prognostic Score, as the basis of risk stratification in patients with lung cancer. Methods. Between 2005 and 2008 all newly diagnosed lung cancer patients coming through the multidisciplinary meetings (MDTs) of four Scottish centres were included in the study. The details of 882 patients with a confirmed new diagnosis of any subtype or stage of lung cancer were collected prospectively. Results. The median survival was 5.6 months (IQR 4.8-6.5). Survival analysis was undertaken in three separate groups based on mGPS score. In the mGPS 0 group the most highly predictive factors were performance status, weight loss, stage of NSCLC, and palliative treatment offered. In the mGPS 1 group performance status, stage of NSCLC, and radical treatment offered were significant. In the mGPS 2 group only performance status and weight loss were statistically significant. Discussion. This present study confirms previous work supporting the use of mGPS in predicting cancer survival; however, it goes further by showing how it might be used to provide more objective risk stratification in patients diagnosed with lung cancer. </p>","PeriodicalId":91139,"journal":{"name":"Lung cancer international","volume":"2014 ","pages":"731925"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/731925","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung cancer international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/731925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Background. Prediction of survival in patients diagnosed with lung cancer remains problematical. The aim of the present study was to examine the clinical utility of an established objective marker of the systemic inflammatory response, the Glasgow Prognostic Score, as the basis of risk stratification in patients with lung cancer. Methods. Between 2005 and 2008 all newly diagnosed lung cancer patients coming through the multidisciplinary meetings (MDTs) of four Scottish centres were included in the study. The details of 882 patients with a confirmed new diagnosis of any subtype or stage of lung cancer were collected prospectively. Results. The median survival was 5.6 months (IQR 4.8-6.5). Survival analysis was undertaken in three separate groups based on mGPS score. In the mGPS 0 group the most highly predictive factors were performance status, weight loss, stage of NSCLC, and palliative treatment offered. In the mGPS 1 group performance status, stage of NSCLC, and radical treatment offered were significant. In the mGPS 2 group only performance status and weight loss were statistically significant. Discussion. This present study confirms previous work supporting the use of mGPS in predicting cancer survival; however, it goes further by showing how it might be used to provide more objective risk stratification in patients diagnosed with lung cancer.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

简单客观的肺癌患者生存预测:宿主全身炎症反应分期。
背景。预测肺癌患者的生存仍然存在问题。本研究的目的是检验作为肺癌患者风险分层基础的系统性炎症反应客观指标——格拉斯哥预后评分的临床应用。方法。2005年至2008年间,所有通过苏格兰四家中心多学科会议(MDTs)的新诊断的肺癌患者都被纳入了研究。前瞻性地收集了882例确诊为任何亚型或分期肺癌的新诊断患者的详细资料。结果。中位生存期为5.6个月(IQR 4.8-6.5)。根据mGPS评分对三组进行生存分析。在mGPS 0组中,最具预测性的因素是运动状态、体重减轻、非小细胞肺癌分期和提供的姑息治疗。在mgps1组中,表现状态、非小细胞肺癌分期和给予的根治性治疗具有显著性。在mGPS 2组中,只有运动状态和体重减轻具有统计学意义。讨论。目前的研究证实了先前支持使用mGPS预测癌症生存的工作;然而,它进一步展示了如何使用它为诊断为肺癌的患者提供更客观的风险分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信