Influence of a revision course and the gender of examiners on the grades of the final ENT exam--a retrospective review of 3961 exams.

GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung Pub Date : 2015-10-15 eCollection Date: 2015-01-01 DOI:10.3205/zma000980
Matthäus C Grasl, Rudolf Seemann, Michael Hanisch, Gregor Heiduschka, Karl Kremser, Dietmar Thurnher
{"title":"Influence of a revision course and the gender of examiners on the grades of the final ENT exam--a retrospective review of 3961 exams.","authors":"Matthäus C Grasl,&nbsp;Rudolf Seemann,&nbsp;Michael Hanisch,&nbsp;Gregor Heiduschka,&nbsp;Karl Kremser,&nbsp;Dietmar Thurnher","doi":"10.3205/zma000980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>Revision courses should repeat already acquired knowledge and skills and mostly provide a basis for passing the following exam.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the study is to investigate the influence of a previously attended revision course on the grades achieved in a final exam (Ear, Nose and Throat Diseases). Additionally we ask the question whether the gender of the examiners plays a role concerning the marks or not.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>3961 exams at the Department of Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT) Diseases in Vienna were investigated, 725 with revision course (experimental group) and 3236 without previous revision course (comparison group). The revision courses were performed in a standardized way concerning form and content, interactive and case based. Both groups were examined uniform in regard to topics and time duration. 16 male and 6 female examiners were involved. The grading followed a five-level scale. The examination marks were calculated in the arithmetic mean and median value for the entire sample, gender dependence was calculated according to the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney-Test. The inferential statistics included single- and multiple factorial analyses of variance as well as uni- and multivariate regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The experimental group achieved a grade average of 2.54 compared with 2.46 for the comparison group. Splitting up into male and female examiners, an average of 2.54 and 2.58 resp. for the experimental group and 2.44 and 2.61 resp. for the comparison group resulted. Female examiner marked significantly lower grades in comparison to their male colleagues (P= 0.001926).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ENT revision course did not improve the grade averages of the final ENT exam. Female examiners grade stricter than male examiners. There was no difference concerning grades 4 (pass) and 5 (fail) but female examiners grade less with mark 1.</p>","PeriodicalId":30054,"journal":{"name":"GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4606481/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/zma000980","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Unlabelled: Revision courses should repeat already acquired knowledge and skills and mostly provide a basis for passing the following exam.

Aim: The aim of the study is to investigate the influence of a previously attended revision course on the grades achieved in a final exam (Ear, Nose and Throat Diseases). Additionally we ask the question whether the gender of the examiners plays a role concerning the marks or not.

Methods: 3961 exams at the Department of Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT) Diseases in Vienna were investigated, 725 with revision course (experimental group) and 3236 without previous revision course (comparison group). The revision courses were performed in a standardized way concerning form and content, interactive and case based. Both groups were examined uniform in regard to topics and time duration. 16 male and 6 female examiners were involved. The grading followed a five-level scale. The examination marks were calculated in the arithmetic mean and median value for the entire sample, gender dependence was calculated according to the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney-Test. The inferential statistics included single- and multiple factorial analyses of variance as well as uni- and multivariate regression models.

Results: The experimental group achieved a grade average of 2.54 compared with 2.46 for the comparison group. Splitting up into male and female examiners, an average of 2.54 and 2.58 resp. for the experimental group and 2.44 and 2.61 resp. for the comparison group resulted. Female examiner marked significantly lower grades in comparison to their male colleagues (P= 0.001926).

Conclusions: The ENT revision course did not improve the grade averages of the final ENT exam. Female examiners grade stricter than male examiners. There was no difference concerning grades 4 (pass) and 5 (fail) but female examiners grade less with mark 1.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

复习课程和审查员性别对耳鼻喉科期末考试成绩的影响——对3961次考试的回顾性回顾。
未标注:复习课程应重复已学习的知识和技能,并主要为通过后续考试提供基础。目的:本研究的目的是调查以前参加过的复习课程对期末考试(耳鼻喉科)成绩的影响。此外,我们还提出了考官的性别是否对分数起作用的问题。方法:对维也纳市耳鼻喉科3961例体检者进行调查,其中有复习课程者725例(实验组),无复习课程者3236例(对照组)。复习课程在形式和内容上都是标准化的,互动式的,基于案例的。两组在主题和时间上的检查是一致的。涉及16名男性审查员和6名女性审查员。评分分为五级。考试成绩以整个样本的算术平均值和中位数计算,性别依赖根据Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney-Test计算。推论统计包括单因子和多因子方差分析,以及单因子和多因子回归模型。结果:实验组平均得分2.54分,对照组平均得分2.46分。分男女考官,平均分别为2.54分和2.58分。实验组分别为2.44和2.61。结果为对照组。女考官的分数明显低于男考官(P= 0.001926)。结论:耳鼻喉科复习课程没有提高耳鼻喉科期末考试的平均成绩。女考官比男考官评分更严格。在4分(及格)和5分(不及格)方面没有差异,但女性主考官给1分的分数较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信