The Decision to Repair or Replace a Defective Restoration is Affected by Who Placed the Original Restoration: Findings from the National Dental PBRN.

Texas dental journal Pub Date : 2015-07-01
Valeria V Gordan, Joseph Riley, Saulo Geraldeli, O Dale Williams, Joseph C Spoto, Gregg H Gilbert
{"title":"The Decision to Repair or Replace a Defective Restoration is Affected by Who Placed the Original Restoration: Findings from the National Dental PBRN.","authors":"Valeria V Gordan,&nbsp;Joseph Riley,&nbsp;Saulo Geraldeli,&nbsp;O Dale Williams,&nbsp;Joseph C Spoto,&nbsp;Gregg H Gilbert","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate how restoration characteristics are associated with the decision to repair or replace an existing restoration. The following hypotheses were studied: dentists who placed the original restoration are more likely to repair instead of replace restorations (H1) that are in molar teeth; (H2) that are in the upper arch; (H3) that have amalgam restorative material; (H4) if a fracture is not the primary reason for the defect; and (H5) when the restoration comprises more than one surface.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study used a consecutive patient/restoration recruitment design. 194 dentists members of a dental practice-based research network recorded data on restorations in permanent teeth that needed repair or replacement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For 6,623 of the 8,770 defective restorations in 6,643 patients, the treatment was provided by the dentist who had not placed the original restoration (75%). The 2-way interaction revealed that dentists who had placed the original restoration often chose to repair when the defective restoration was in a molar, relative to premolar or anterior teeth (OR = 2.2, p <.001); and chose to replace when the restoration had amalgam (OR = 0.5, p < .001), and when it was a fracture compared to another reason (OR = 0.8, p = 001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most dentists are not conservative when they revisit a restoration that they originally placed regardless of type of failure, number of surfaces or material used. However, dentists who had placed the original restoration were significantly more likely to repair it when the defective restoration was in a molar tooth.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Most dentists who placed the original restoration were prone to replace it, however if the defective restoration was located in a molar tooth they would consider repairing it.</p>","PeriodicalId":74919,"journal":{"name":"Texas dental journal","volume":"132 7","pages":"448-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Texas dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate how restoration characteristics are associated with the decision to repair or replace an existing restoration. The following hypotheses were studied: dentists who placed the original restoration are more likely to repair instead of replace restorations (H1) that are in molar teeth; (H2) that are in the upper arch; (H3) that have amalgam restorative material; (H4) if a fracture is not the primary reason for the defect; and (H5) when the restoration comprises more than one surface.

Methods: This cross-sectional study used a consecutive patient/restoration recruitment design. 194 dentists members of a dental practice-based research network recorded data on restorations in permanent teeth that needed repair or replacement.

Results: For 6,623 of the 8,770 defective restorations in 6,643 patients, the treatment was provided by the dentist who had not placed the original restoration (75%). The 2-way interaction revealed that dentists who had placed the original restoration often chose to repair when the defective restoration was in a molar, relative to premolar or anterior teeth (OR = 2.2, p <.001); and chose to replace when the restoration had amalgam (OR = 0.5, p < .001), and when it was a fracture compared to another reason (OR = 0.8, p = 001).

Conclusion: Most dentists are not conservative when they revisit a restoration that they originally placed regardless of type of failure, number of surfaces or material used. However, dentists who had placed the original restoration were significantly more likely to repair it when the defective restoration was in a molar tooth.

Clinical significance: Most dentists who placed the original restoration were prone to replace it, however if the defective restoration was located in a molar tooth they would consider repairing it.

修复或更换有缺陷的修复体的决定受到放置原始修复体的人的影响:来自国家牙科PBRN的调查结果。
目的:评估修复特征与修复或替换现有修复的决定之间的关系。研究了以下假设:放置原始修复体的牙医更有可能修复而不是替换臼齿上的修复体(H1);(H2)位于上拱;(三)有汞合金修复材料的;(H4)如果骨折不是缺陷的主要原因;(H5)当修复包括一个以上表面时。方法:本横断面研究采用连续患者/修复体招募设计。一个基于牙科实践的研究网络的194名牙医成员记录了需要修复或更换的恒牙修复数据。结果:6643例患者8,770个缺损修复体中,有6,623例(75%)由未放置原修复体的牙医提供治疗。双向交互作用显示,放置原始修复体的牙医通常选择修复缺损修复体在臼齿,相对于前臼齿或前牙(or = 2.2, p)。结论:大多数牙医在重新访问他们最初放置的修复体时并不保守,无论其类型,表面数量或使用的材料如何。然而,当有缺陷的修复体在臼齿上时,放置原始修复体的牙医更有可能修复它。临床意义:大多数放置原修复体的牙医倾向于更换,但如果缺损修复体位于臼齿,他们会考虑修复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信