Role of Theories in the Design of Web-Based Person-Centered Support: A Critical Analysis.

International Journal of Chronic Diseases Pub Date : 2014-01-01 Epub Date: 2014-03-19 DOI:10.1155/2014/603047
Agneta Ranerup, Carina Sparud-Lundin, Ingalill Koinberg, Ingela Skärsäter, Margaretha Jenholt-Nolbris, Marie Berg
{"title":"Role of Theories in the Design of Web-Based Person-Centered Support: A Critical Analysis.","authors":"Agneta Ranerup,&nbsp;Carina Sparud-Lundin,&nbsp;Ingalill Koinberg,&nbsp;Ingela Skärsäter,&nbsp;Margaretha Jenholt-Nolbris,&nbsp;Marie Berg","doi":"10.1155/2014/603047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective. The aim of this study was to provide a critical understanding of the role of theories and their compatibility with a person-centered approach in the design and evaluation of web-based support for the management of chronic illness. Methods. Exploration of web-based support research projects focusing on four cases: (1) preschool children aged 4-6 with bladder dysfunction and urogenital malformation; (2) young adults aged 16-25 living with mental illness; (3) women with type 1 diabetes who are pregnant or in early motherhood; and (4) women who have undergone surgery for breast cancer. Data comprised interviews with research leaders and documented plans. Analysis was performed by means of a cross-case methodology. Results. The used theories concerned design, learning, health and well-being, or transition. All web support products had been developed using a participatory design (PD). Fundamental to the technology design and evaluation of outcomes were theories focusing on learning and on health and well-being. All theories were compatible with a person-centered approach. However, a notable exception was the relatively collective character of PD and Communities of Practice. Conclusion. Our results illustrate multifaceted ways for theories to be used in the design and evaluation of web-based support. </p>","PeriodicalId":13831,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chronic Diseases","volume":"2014 ","pages":"603047"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/603047","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chronic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/603047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective. The aim of this study was to provide a critical understanding of the role of theories and their compatibility with a person-centered approach in the design and evaluation of web-based support for the management of chronic illness. Methods. Exploration of web-based support research projects focusing on four cases: (1) preschool children aged 4-6 with bladder dysfunction and urogenital malformation; (2) young adults aged 16-25 living with mental illness; (3) women with type 1 diabetes who are pregnant or in early motherhood; and (4) women who have undergone surgery for breast cancer. Data comprised interviews with research leaders and documented plans. Analysis was performed by means of a cross-case methodology. Results. The used theories concerned design, learning, health and well-being, or transition. All web support products had been developed using a participatory design (PD). Fundamental to the technology design and evaluation of outcomes were theories focusing on learning and on health and well-being. All theories were compatible with a person-centered approach. However, a notable exception was the relatively collective character of PD and Communities of Practice. Conclusion. Our results illustrate multifaceted ways for theories to be used in the design and evaluation of web-based support.

理论在基于网络的以人为本的支持设计中的作用:批判性分析。
目标。本研究的目的是对理论的作用及其与以人为本的方法在慢性病管理的网络支持设计和评估中的兼容性提供批判性的理解。方法。基于网络的支持研究项目探索:①4-6岁学龄前膀胱功能障碍、泌尿生殖系统畸形儿童;(2) 16-25岁患有精神疾病的青壮年;(3)妊娠或初产的1型糖尿病妇女;(4)接受过乳腺癌手术的妇女。数据包括对研究负责人的采访和记录在案的计划。通过交叉案例方法进行分析。结果。所使用的理论涉及设计、学习、健康和幸福,或过渡。所有网络支持产品都是使用参与式设计(PD)开发的。技术设计和成果评价的基础是注重学习和健康与福祉的理论。所有的理论都符合以人为本的方法。然而,一个明显的例外是PD和实践社区的相对集体性。结论。我们的研究结果说明了在基于网络的支持设计和评估中使用理论的多方面方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信