Tuberculosis (HIV-negative people): improving adherence.

BMJ clinical evidence Pub Date : 2015-08-11
Liliya Eugenevna Ziganshina, Michael Eisenhut
{"title":"Tuberculosis (HIV-negative people): improving adherence.","authors":"Liliya Eugenevna Ziganshina, Michael Eisenhut","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>About one third of the world's population has immunological evidence of previous exposure to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. In 2013, an estimated 9.0 million people developed tuberculosis (TB) and 1.5 million died from the disease.</p><p><strong>Methods and outcomes: </strong>We conducted a systematic overview, aiming to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of directly observed treatment (DOT) versus self-administered treatment (SAT) in people with tuberculosis without HIV infection? What are the effects of support mechanisms for DOT in people with tuberculosis without HIV infection? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to June 2014 (Clinical Evidence overviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this overview).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At this update, searching of electronic databases retrieved 189 studies. After deduplication and removal of conference abstracts, 104 records were screened for inclusion in the overview. Appraisal of titles and abstracts led to the exclusion of 86 studies and the further review of 18 full publications. Of the 18 full articles evaluated, three systematic reviews and one RCT were added at this update. We performed a GRADE evaluation for 12 PICO combinations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this systematic overview, we categorised the efficacy for 13 interventions based on information relating to the effectiveness and safety of directly observed treatment and support mechanisms for directly observed treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":72432,"journal":{"name":"BMJ clinical evidence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4531336/pdf/2015-0904.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ clinical evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: About one third of the world's population has immunological evidence of previous exposure to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. In 2013, an estimated 9.0 million people developed tuberculosis (TB) and 1.5 million died from the disease.

Methods and outcomes: We conducted a systematic overview, aiming to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of directly observed treatment (DOT) versus self-administered treatment (SAT) in people with tuberculosis without HIV infection? What are the effects of support mechanisms for DOT in people with tuberculosis without HIV infection? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to June 2014 (Clinical Evidence overviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this overview).

Results: At this update, searching of electronic databases retrieved 189 studies. After deduplication and removal of conference abstracts, 104 records were screened for inclusion in the overview. Appraisal of titles and abstracts led to the exclusion of 86 studies and the further review of 18 full publications. Of the 18 full articles evaluated, three systematic reviews and one RCT were added at this update. We performed a GRADE evaluation for 12 PICO combinations.

Conclusions: In this systematic overview, we categorised the efficacy for 13 interventions based on information relating to the effectiveness and safety of directly observed treatment and support mechanisms for directly observed treatment.

结核病(艾滋病毒阴性者):改善坚持治疗的情况。
导言:全球约有三分之一的人口有免疫学证据表明曾接触过结核分枝杆菌。2013 年,估计有 900 万人罹患结核病,150 万人死于结核病:我们进行了一项系统性综述,旨在回答以下临床问题:在未感染艾滋病毒的结核病患者中,直接观察治疗(DOT)与自我管理治疗(SAT)的效果如何?对未感染 HIV 的肺结核患者而言,直接观察治疗的支持机制有哪些效果?我们检索了Medline、Embase、The Cochrane Library 和其他重要数据库(截至 2014 年 6 月)(临床证据综述定期更新;请在我们的网站上查看本综述的最新版本):在本次更新中,电子数据库共检索到 189 项研究。经过重复数据删除和会议摘要去除后,筛选出 104 条记录纳入本综述。通过对标题和摘要的评估,排除了 86 项研究,并对 18 篇全文进行了进一步审查。在已评估的 18 篇完整文章中,本次更新增加了 3 篇系统综述和 1 篇 RCT。我们对 12 个 PICO 组合进行了 GRADE 评估:在本系统综述中,我们根据与直接观察治疗的有效性和安全性以及直接观察治疗的支持机制相关的信息,对 13 项干预措施的疗效进行了分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信