A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study of roxithromycin and doxycycline combination, roxithromycin alone, or matching placebo for 12 weeks in adults with frequent exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Eskandarain Shafuddin, Graham D Mills, Mark D Holmes, Phillippa J Poole, Peter R Mullins, Peter N Black
{"title":"A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study of roxithromycin and doxycycline combination, roxithromycin alone, or matching placebo for 12 weeks in adults with frequent exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.","authors":"Eskandarain Shafuddin,&nbsp;Graham D Mills,&nbsp;Mark D Holmes,&nbsp;Phillippa J Poole,&nbsp;Peter R Mullins,&nbsp;Peter N Black","doi":"10.1186/s12952-015-0034-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Azithromycin prophylaxis has been shown to reduce COPD exacerbations but there is poor evidence for other antibiotics. We compared exacerbation rates in COPD patients with a history of frequent exacerbations (at least three moderate or severe COPD exacerbations in the past two years) during a 12-week treatment course and over a subsequent 48-week follow up period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>292 patients were randomised to one of three treatments for 12 weeks: roxithromycin 300 mg daily and doxycycline 100 mg daily (n = 101); roxithromycin 300 mg daily (n = 97); or matching placebos (n = 94). There were no differences in the annualised moderate and severe exacerbation rates after treatment with roxithromycin/doxycycline (2.83 (95 % CI 2.37-3.40)) or roxithromycin only (2.69 (2.26-3.21)) compared to placebo (2.5 (2.08-3.03)) (p = 0.352 and p = 0.5832 respectively). Furthermore, there were no differences in the annualised exacerbation rates during 12-week treatment with roxithromycin/doxycycline (1.64 (95 % CI 1.17-2.30)), roxithromycin only (1.75 (1.24-2.41)) or placebo (2.23 (1.68-3.03)) (p = 0.1709 and p = 0.2545 respectively). There were also no significant differences between groups for spirometry or quality of life scores over either the 12-week treatment or 48-week post-treatment periods. Both active treatments were associated with nausea but otherwise adverse events were comparable among treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Twelve-weeks of prophylaxis with roxithromycin/doxycycline combination or roxithromycin alone did not reduce COPD exacerbations in patients with history of frequent exacerbations. These findings do not support the use of these antibiotics to prevent exacerbations in COPD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":73849,"journal":{"name":"Journal of negative results in biomedicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12952-015-0034-8","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of negative results in biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12952-015-0034-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Background: Azithromycin prophylaxis has been shown to reduce COPD exacerbations but there is poor evidence for other antibiotics. We compared exacerbation rates in COPD patients with a history of frequent exacerbations (at least three moderate or severe COPD exacerbations in the past two years) during a 12-week treatment course and over a subsequent 48-week follow up period.

Results: 292 patients were randomised to one of three treatments for 12 weeks: roxithromycin 300 mg daily and doxycycline 100 mg daily (n = 101); roxithromycin 300 mg daily (n = 97); or matching placebos (n = 94). There were no differences in the annualised moderate and severe exacerbation rates after treatment with roxithromycin/doxycycline (2.83 (95 % CI 2.37-3.40)) or roxithromycin only (2.69 (2.26-3.21)) compared to placebo (2.5 (2.08-3.03)) (p = 0.352 and p = 0.5832 respectively). Furthermore, there were no differences in the annualised exacerbation rates during 12-week treatment with roxithromycin/doxycycline (1.64 (95 % CI 1.17-2.30)), roxithromycin only (1.75 (1.24-2.41)) or placebo (2.23 (1.68-3.03)) (p = 0.1709 and p = 0.2545 respectively). There were also no significant differences between groups for spirometry or quality of life scores over either the 12-week treatment or 48-week post-treatment periods. Both active treatments were associated with nausea but otherwise adverse events were comparable among treatment groups.

Conclusions: Twelve-weeks of prophylaxis with roxithromycin/doxycycline combination or roxithromycin alone did not reduce COPD exacerbations in patients with history of frequent exacerbations. These findings do not support the use of these antibiotics to prevent exacerbations in COPD patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照研究,在慢性阻塞性肺疾病频繁加重的成年人中,使用罗红霉素和强力霉素联合、罗红霉素单独或匹配安慰剂12周。
背景:阿奇霉素预防已被证明可减少COPD恶化,但其他抗生素的证据不足。在为期12周的治疗过程和随后的48周随访期间,我们比较了有频繁急性发作史(在过去两年中至少有三次中度或重度COPD急性发作)的COPD患者的急性发作率。结果:292例患者被随机分配到三种治疗方案中的一种,持续12周:罗红霉素300 mg /天和强力霉素100 mg /天(n = 101);罗红霉素每日300毫克(n = 97);或匹配安慰剂(n = 94)。与安慰剂(2.5(2.08-3.03))相比,罗红霉素/强力霉素治疗后的年化中重度加重率(2.83 (95% CI 2.37-3.40))或仅罗红霉素治疗后的年化中重度加重率(2.69(2.26-3.21))无差异(p = 0.352和p = 0.5832)。此外,在罗红霉素/多西环素治疗12周期间,年化恶化率无差异(1.64 (95% CI 1.17-2.30)),仅罗红霉素(1.75(1.24-2.41))或安慰剂(2.23 (1.68-3.03))(p = 0.1709和p = 0.2545)。在治疗12周或治疗后48周期间,两组之间的肺活量测量或生活质量评分也没有显著差异。两种积极治疗均与恶心有关,但其他不良事件在治疗组之间具有可比性。结论:罗红霉素/多西环素联合用药或罗红霉素单独用药12周并不能减少有频繁加重史的患者COPD加重。这些发现不支持使用这些抗生素来预防COPD患者的恶化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信