Psychopathology in Substance Use Disorder Patients with and without Substance-Induced Psychosis.

Journal of Addiction Pub Date : 2015-01-01 Epub Date: 2015-08-31 DOI:10.1155/2015/843762
Simon Zhornitsky, Andràs Tikàsz, Élie Rizkallah, Jean-Pierre Chiasson, Stéphane Potvin
{"title":"Psychopathology in Substance Use Disorder Patients with and without Substance-Induced Psychosis.","authors":"Simon Zhornitsky,&nbsp;Andràs Tikàsz,&nbsp;Élie Rizkallah,&nbsp;Jean-Pierre Chiasson,&nbsp;Stéphane Potvin","doi":"10.1155/2015/843762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background. Substance-induced psychotic disorder (SIPD) is a diagnosis constructed to distinguish substance-induced psychotic states from primary psychotic disorders. A number of studies have compared SIPD persons with primary psychotic patients, but there is little data on what differentiates substance use disorder (SUD) individuals with and without SIPD. Here, we compared psychopathology, sociodemographic variables, and substance use characteristics between SUD patients with and without SIPD. Methods. A retrospective chart review was conducted on newly admitted patients at a rehabilitation centre between 2007 and 2012. Results. Of the 379 patients included in the study, 5% were diagnosed with SIPD (n = 19) and 95% were diagnosed with SUDs without SIPD (n = 360). More SIPD patients reported using cannabis and psychostimulants, and fewer SIPD patients reported using alcohol than SUDs patients without SIPD. SIPD patients scored higher on the \"schizophrenia nuclear symptoms\" dimension of the SCL-90R psychoticism scale and exhibited more ClusterB personality traits than SUD patients without SIPD. Discussion. These data are consistent with previous studies suggesting that psychopathology, substance type, and sociodemographic variables play important role in the development of SIPD. More importantly, the results highlight the need for paying greater attention to the types of self-reported psychotic symptoms during the assessment of psychotomimetic effects associated with psychoactive substances. </p>","PeriodicalId":30499,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addiction","volume":"2015 ","pages":"843762"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2015/843762","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Addiction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/843762","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Background. Substance-induced psychotic disorder (SIPD) is a diagnosis constructed to distinguish substance-induced psychotic states from primary psychotic disorders. A number of studies have compared SIPD persons with primary psychotic patients, but there is little data on what differentiates substance use disorder (SUD) individuals with and without SIPD. Here, we compared psychopathology, sociodemographic variables, and substance use characteristics between SUD patients with and without SIPD. Methods. A retrospective chart review was conducted on newly admitted patients at a rehabilitation centre between 2007 and 2012. Results. Of the 379 patients included in the study, 5% were diagnosed with SIPD (n = 19) and 95% were diagnosed with SUDs without SIPD (n = 360). More SIPD patients reported using cannabis and psychostimulants, and fewer SIPD patients reported using alcohol than SUDs patients without SIPD. SIPD patients scored higher on the "schizophrenia nuclear symptoms" dimension of the SCL-90R psychoticism scale and exhibited more ClusterB personality traits than SUD patients without SIPD. Discussion. These data are consistent with previous studies suggesting that psychopathology, substance type, and sociodemographic variables play important role in the development of SIPD. More importantly, the results highlight the need for paying greater attention to the types of self-reported psychotic symptoms during the assessment of psychotomimetic effects associated with psychoactive substances.

物质使用障碍患者的精神病理与非物质诱发性精神病。
背景。物质诱发性精神障碍(SIPD)是一种区分物质诱发性精神状态与原发性精神障碍的诊断方法。许多研究将SIPD患者与原发精神病患者进行了比较,但很少有数据表明有和没有SIPD的物质使用障碍(SUD)个体有什么不同。在这里,我们比较了患有和不患有SIPD的SUD患者的精神病理学、社会人口学变量和物质使用特征。方法。对2007年至2012年在康复中心新入院的患者进行回顾性图表审查。结果。在纳入研究的379例患者中,5%被诊断为SIPD (n = 19), 95%被诊断为无SIPD的sud (n = 360)。与没有SIPD的SUDs患者相比,更多的SIPD患者报告使用大麻和精神兴奋剂,更少的SIPD患者报告使用酒精。SIPD患者在SCL-90R精神病量表“精神分裂症核症状”维度得分高于非SIPD的SUD患者,表现出更多的ClusterB人格特征。讨论。这些数据与先前的研究一致,表明精神病理、物质类型和社会人口学变量在SIPD的发展中起重要作用。更重要的是,研究结果强调,在评估与精神活性物质相关的拟精神效应时,需要更多地关注自我报告的精神症状类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信