Towards a measurement of internalization of collaboration scripts in the medical context - results of a pilot study.

GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung Pub Date : 2015-08-17 eCollection Date: 2015-01-01 DOI:10.3205/zma000974
Jan Kiesewetter, Martin Gluza, Matthias Holzer, Barbara Saravo, Laura Hammitzsch, Martin R Fischer
{"title":"Towards a measurement of internalization of collaboration scripts in the medical context - results of a pilot study.","authors":"Jan Kiesewetter,&nbsp;Martin Gluza,&nbsp;Matthias Holzer,&nbsp;Barbara Saravo,&nbsp;Laura Hammitzsch,&nbsp;Martin R Fischer","doi":"10.3205/zma000974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Collaboration as a key qualification in medical education and everyday routine in clinical care can substantially contribute to improving patient safety. Internal collaboration scripts are conceptualized as organized - yet adaptive - knowledge that can be used in specific situations in professional everyday life. This study examines the level of internalization of collaboration scripts in medicine. Internalization is understood as fast retrieval of script information.</p><p><strong>Goal: </strong>The goals of the current study were the assessment of collaborative information, which is part of collaboration scripts, and the development of a methodology for measuring the level of internalization of collaboration scripts in medicine.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>For the contrastive comparison of internal collaboration scripts, 20 collaborative novices (medical students in their final year) and 20 collaborative experts (physicians with specialist degrees in internal medicine or anesthesiology) were included in the study. Eight typical medical collaborative situations as shown on a photo or video were presented to the participants for five seconds each. Afterwards, the participants were asked to describe what they saw on the photo or video. Based on the answers, the amount of information belonging to a collaboration script (script-information) was determined and the time each participant needed for answering was measured. In order to measure the level of internalization, script-information per recall time was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As expected, collaborative experts stated significantly more script-information than collaborative novices. As well, collaborative experts showed a significantly higher level of internalization.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on the findings of this research, we conclude that our instrument can discriminate between collaboration novices and experts. It therefore can be used to analyze measures to foster subject-specific competency in medical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":30054,"journal":{"name":"GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung","volume":"32 3","pages":"Doc32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4580441/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/zma000974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Collaboration as a key qualification in medical education and everyday routine in clinical care can substantially contribute to improving patient safety. Internal collaboration scripts are conceptualized as organized - yet adaptive - knowledge that can be used in specific situations in professional everyday life. This study examines the level of internalization of collaboration scripts in medicine. Internalization is understood as fast retrieval of script information.

Goal: The goals of the current study were the assessment of collaborative information, which is part of collaboration scripts, and the development of a methodology for measuring the level of internalization of collaboration scripts in medicine.

Method: For the contrastive comparison of internal collaboration scripts, 20 collaborative novices (medical students in their final year) and 20 collaborative experts (physicians with specialist degrees in internal medicine or anesthesiology) were included in the study. Eight typical medical collaborative situations as shown on a photo or video were presented to the participants for five seconds each. Afterwards, the participants were asked to describe what they saw on the photo or video. Based on the answers, the amount of information belonging to a collaboration script (script-information) was determined and the time each participant needed for answering was measured. In order to measure the level of internalization, script-information per recall time was calculated.

Results: As expected, collaborative experts stated significantly more script-information than collaborative novices. As well, collaborative experts showed a significantly higher level of internalization.

Conclusions: Based on the findings of this research, we conclude that our instrument can discriminate between collaboration novices and experts. It therefore can be used to analyze measures to foster subject-specific competency in medical education.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

对医疗环境中协作脚本内部化的测量——一项试点研究的结果。
背景:协作作为医学教育和日常临床护理的关键资格,可以大大有助于提高患者安全。内部协作脚本被概念化为可用于专业日常生活中的特定情况的有组织的(但具有适应性的)知识。本研究探讨医学合作剧本的内化程度。内部化可以理解为脚本信息的快速检索。目标:当前研究的目标是评估协作信息,这是协作脚本的一部分,以及开发一种测量医学协作脚本内部化水平的方法。方法:选取20名协作新手(医学生)和20名协作专家(内科或麻醉学专科医师)进行内部协作脚本的对比研究。通过照片或视频向参与者展示了八种典型的医疗协作情况,每种情况5秒钟。之后,参与者被要求描述他们在照片或视频中看到的东西。根据答案,确定属于协作脚本(脚本-信息)的信息量,并测量每个参与者回答所需的时间。为了测量内化程度,计算了每次回忆时间的脚本信息。结果:正如预期的那样,协作专家比协作新手陈述了更多的脚本信息。同时,协作型专家的内化水平明显更高。结论:基于本研究的结果,我们得出结论,我们的工具可以区分合作新手和专家。因此,它可以用来分析在医学教育中培养特定学科能力的措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信