Using Chemical Release Surveillance Data to Evaluate the Public Health Impacts of Chlorine and Its Alternatives.

Perri Zeitz Ruckart, Ayana Anderson, Wanda Lizak Welles
{"title":"Using Chemical Release Surveillance Data to Evaluate the Public Health Impacts of Chlorine and Its Alternatives.","authors":"Perri Zeitz Ruckart, Ayana Anderson, Wanda Lizak Welles","doi":"10.4236/jep.2012.312177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>More than 80 million Americans may be at risk of a chemical exposure because they live near one of the 101 most hazardous chemical facilities or near routes used to transport hazardous chemicals. One approach to hazard reduction is to use less toxic alternatives. Chlorine, one of the chemicals posing the greatest public health danger, has several alternatives depending on the application.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data collected during 1993-2008 by 17 state health departments participating in the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry's (ATSDR) active chemical incident surveillance program. We conducted descriptive analyses to evaluate whether five chlorine alternatives (calcium hypochlorite, hydrogen peroxide, sodium chlorate, sodium hydrosulfite, and sodium hypochlorite) resulted in less severe incidents. We used chi square and z-score analyses to test significance, where appropriate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During 1993-2008, 2040 incidents involved chlorine, and 1246 incidents involved chlorine alternatives. Nearly 30% of chlorine releases resulted in injured persons, as compared to 13% of chlorine alternatives that resulted in injury. Although similar proportions of persons injured in chlorine or chlorine alternative releases were treated on scene (18% and 14%, respectively) and at a hospital (58% and 60%, respectively), there was a greater proportion of hospital admissions following chlorine releases than there was following releases of chlorine alternatives (10 % vs. 4%) (p < 0.01). There were significantly fewer victims per release for hydrogen peroxide (0.2) than there were for chlorine (1.3) in paper manufacturing (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Exposures to these five potential chlorine alternatives resulted in a lower proportion of exposed persons requiring hospital admission. To reduce acute public health injuries associated with chemical exposures, users should consider a chlorine alternative when such a substitution is reasonable.</p>","PeriodicalId":15775,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Protection","volume":"3 12","pages":"1607-1614"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4539300/pdf/nihms714635.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Protection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2012.312177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: More than 80 million Americans may be at risk of a chemical exposure because they live near one of the 101 most hazardous chemical facilities or near routes used to transport hazardous chemicals. One approach to hazard reduction is to use less toxic alternatives. Chlorine, one of the chemicals posing the greatest public health danger, has several alternatives depending on the application.

Methods: We analyzed data collected during 1993-2008 by 17 state health departments participating in the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry's (ATSDR) active chemical incident surveillance program. We conducted descriptive analyses to evaluate whether five chlorine alternatives (calcium hypochlorite, hydrogen peroxide, sodium chlorate, sodium hydrosulfite, and sodium hypochlorite) resulted in less severe incidents. We used chi square and z-score analyses to test significance, where appropriate.

Results: During 1993-2008, 2040 incidents involved chlorine, and 1246 incidents involved chlorine alternatives. Nearly 30% of chlorine releases resulted in injured persons, as compared to 13% of chlorine alternatives that resulted in injury. Although similar proportions of persons injured in chlorine or chlorine alternative releases were treated on scene (18% and 14%, respectively) and at a hospital (58% and 60%, respectively), there was a greater proportion of hospital admissions following chlorine releases than there was following releases of chlorine alternatives (10 % vs. 4%) (p < 0.01). There were significantly fewer victims per release for hydrogen peroxide (0.2) than there were for chlorine (1.3) in paper manufacturing (p < 0.01).

Conclusion: Exposures to these five potential chlorine alternatives resulted in a lower proportion of exposed persons requiring hospital admission. To reduce acute public health injuries associated with chemical exposures, users should consider a chlorine alternative when such a substitution is reasonable.

利用化学品释放监测数据评估氯及其替代品对公众健康的影响。
背景:8000 多万美国人可能因为居住在 101 个最危险的化学设施附近或危险化学品运输路线附近而面临接触化学品的风险。减少危害的方法之一是使用毒性较低的替代品。氯是对公众健康危害最大的化学品之一,根据用途的不同,它有多种替代品:我们分析了有毒物质与疾病登记局 (ATSDR) 化学品事故主动监控计划的 17 个州卫生部门在 1993-2008 年间收集的数据。我们进行了描述性分析,以评估五种氯替代品(次氯酸钙、过氧化氢、氯酸钠、亚硫酸氢钠和次氯酸钠)是否会导致较轻的事故。我们酌情使用了卡方分析和 z-分数分析来检验显著性:1993-2008 年间,2040 起事故涉及氯,1246 起事故涉及氯替代品。近 30% 的氯气释放导致人员受伤,而 13% 的氯气替代品释放导致人员受伤。尽管氯气或氯替代品释放事故中受伤人员接受现场治疗(分别为 18% 和 14%)和医院治疗(分别为 58% 和 60%)的比例相似,但氯气释放事故后入院治疗的比例要高于氯替代品释放事故(10% 对 4%)(p < 0.01)。在造纸业中,每次释放双氧水(0.2 人)造成的死亡人数明显少于释放氯气(1.3 人)造成的死亡人数(P < 0.01):结论:接触这五种潜在的氯替代品导致需要入院治疗的接触者比例较低。为了减少与化学品接触相关的急性公共卫生伤害,用户应在合理的情况下考虑使用氯替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信