Emily Gentes, Paul A Dennis, Nathan A Kimbrel, Angela C Kirby, Lauren P Hair, Jean C Beckham, Patrick S Calhoun
{"title":"Latent Factor Structure of <i>DSM-5</i> Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.","authors":"Emily Gentes, Paul A Dennis, Nathan A Kimbrel, Angela C Kirby, Lauren P Hair, Jean C Beckham, Patrick S Calhoun","doi":"10.5127/pr.035914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current study examined the latent factor structure of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) based on <i>DSM-5</i> criteria in a sample of participants (<i>N</i> = 374) recruited for studies on trauma and health. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were used to compare the fit of the previous 3-factor <i>DSM-IV</i> model of PTSD to the 4-factor model specified in <i>DSM-5</i> as well as to a competing 4-factor \"dysphoria\" model (Simms, Watson, & Doebbeling, 2002) and a 5-factor (Elhai et al., 2011) model of PTSD. Results indicated that the Elhai 5-factor model (re-experiencing, active avoidance, emotional numbing, dysphoric arousal, anxious arousal) provided the best fit to the data, although substantial support was demonstrated for the <i>DSM-5</i> 4-factor model. Low factor loadings were noted for two of the symptoms in the <i>DSM-5</i> model (psychogenic amnesia and reckless/self-destructive behavior), which raises questions regarding the adequacy of fit of these symptoms with other core features of the disorder. Overall, the findings from the present research suggest the <i>DSM-5</i> model of PTSD is a significant improvement over the previous <i>DSM-IV</i> model of PTSD.</p>","PeriodicalId":90957,"journal":{"name":"Psychopathology review","volume":"2 1","pages":"17-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4563872/pdf/nihms718790.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychopathology review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5127/pr.035914","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The current study examined the latent factor structure of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) based on DSM-5 criteria in a sample of participants (N = 374) recruited for studies on trauma and health. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were used to compare the fit of the previous 3-factor DSM-IV model of PTSD to the 4-factor model specified in DSM-5 as well as to a competing 4-factor "dysphoria" model (Simms, Watson, & Doebbeling, 2002) and a 5-factor (Elhai et al., 2011) model of PTSD. Results indicated that the Elhai 5-factor model (re-experiencing, active avoidance, emotional numbing, dysphoric arousal, anxious arousal) provided the best fit to the data, although substantial support was demonstrated for the DSM-5 4-factor model. Low factor loadings were noted for two of the symptoms in the DSM-5 model (psychogenic amnesia and reckless/self-destructive behavior), which raises questions regarding the adequacy of fit of these symptoms with other core features of the disorder. Overall, the findings from the present research suggest the DSM-5 model of PTSD is a significant improvement over the previous DSM-IV model of PTSD.