Indigenous Space and the Landscape of Settlement: A Historian as Expert Witness.

Susan E Gray
{"title":"Indigenous Space and the Landscape of Settlement: A Historian as Expert Witness.","authors":"Susan E Gray","doi":"10.1525/tph.2015.37.1.54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This essay examines my work as expert witness in the case of U.S. v. Michigan, a Indigenous use-rights case. I was charged with parsing the intention of a specific article of the 1836 Treaty of Washington compelling land cession by Anishinaabe peoples and with writing a history of land use in the area from that date to the present for the Chippewa Ottawa Resource Authority (my employer). The challenges were not only methodological (how do you estimate use from ownership?) and epistemological (what constitutes proof that will satisfy both historians and lawyers?), but also sociological and psychological: what happens when an associate professor puts her progress toward full professor on hold for the sake of a court case?</p>","PeriodicalId":516880,"journal":{"name":"The Public Historian","volume":"37 1","pages":"54-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1525/tph.2015.37.1.54","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Public Historian","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/tph.2015.37.1.54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This essay examines my work as expert witness in the case of U.S. v. Michigan, a Indigenous use-rights case. I was charged with parsing the intention of a specific article of the 1836 Treaty of Washington compelling land cession by Anishinaabe peoples and with writing a history of land use in the area from that date to the present for the Chippewa Ottawa Resource Authority (my employer). The challenges were not only methodological (how do you estimate use from ownership?) and epistemological (what constitutes proof that will satisfy both historians and lawyers?), but also sociological and psychological: what happens when an associate professor puts her progress toward full professor on hold for the sake of a court case?

本土空间与聚落景观:作为专家见证的历史学家。
这篇文章考察了我在美国诉密歇根州一案中作为专家证人的工作,这是一个土著使用权案件。我的任务是分析1836年《华盛顿条约》(Treaty of Washington)中强迫阿尼什纳布族割让土地的特定条款的意图,并为奇佩瓦渥太华资源管理局(Chippewa Ottawa Resource Authority)(我的雇主)撰写该地区从那时到现在的土地使用历史。挑战不仅是方法论上的(你如何估计所有权的使用?)和认识论上的(什么构成的证据能让历史学家和律师都满意?),还有社会学和心理学上的:当副教授为了法庭案件而暂停她的正教授进程时,会发生什么?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书