Pain Sensitisation in Women with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study.

Arthritis Pub Date : 2015-01-01 Epub Date: 2015-07-21 DOI:10.1155/2015/434109
Nora Vladimirova, Anders Jespersen, Else Marie Bartels, Anton W Christensen, Henning Bliddal, Bente Danneskiold-Samsøe
{"title":"Pain Sensitisation in Women with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Nora Vladimirova,&nbsp;Anders Jespersen,&nbsp;Else Marie Bartels,&nbsp;Anton W Christensen,&nbsp;Henning Bliddal,&nbsp;Bente Danneskiold-Samsøe","doi":"10.1155/2015/434109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectives. In some rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, joint pain persists without signs of inflammation. This indicates that central pain sensitisation may play a role in the generation of chronic pain in a subgroup of RA. Our aim was to assess the degree of peripheral and central pain sensitisation in women with active RA compared to healthy controls (HC). Methods. 38 women with active RA (DAS28 > 2.6) and 38 female HC were included in, and completed, the study. Exclusion criteria were polyneuropathy, pregnancy, and no Danish language. Cuff Pressure Algometry measurements were carried out on the dominant lower leg. Pain threshold, pain tolerance, and pain sensitivity during tonic painful stimulation were recorded. Results. Women with active RA had significantly lower pain threshold (p < 0.01) and pain tolerance (p < 0.01) than HC. The mean temporal summation- (TS-) index in RA patients was 0.98 (SEM: 0.09) and 0.71 (SEM: 0.04) in HC (p < 0.01). Conclusion. Patients with active RA showed decreased pressure-pain threshold compared to HC. In addition, temporal summation of pressure-pain was increased, indicating central pain sensitization, at least in some patients. Defining this subgroup of patients may be of importance when considering treatment strategies. </p>","PeriodicalId":89323,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis","volume":"2015 ","pages":"434109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2015/434109","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/434109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

Objectives. In some rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, joint pain persists without signs of inflammation. This indicates that central pain sensitisation may play a role in the generation of chronic pain in a subgroup of RA. Our aim was to assess the degree of peripheral and central pain sensitisation in women with active RA compared to healthy controls (HC). Methods. 38 women with active RA (DAS28 > 2.6) and 38 female HC were included in, and completed, the study. Exclusion criteria were polyneuropathy, pregnancy, and no Danish language. Cuff Pressure Algometry measurements were carried out on the dominant lower leg. Pain threshold, pain tolerance, and pain sensitivity during tonic painful stimulation were recorded. Results. Women with active RA had significantly lower pain threshold (p < 0.01) and pain tolerance (p < 0.01) than HC. The mean temporal summation- (TS-) index in RA patients was 0.98 (SEM: 0.09) and 0.71 (SEM: 0.04) in HC (p < 0.01). Conclusion. Patients with active RA showed decreased pressure-pain threshold compared to HC. In addition, temporal summation of pressure-pain was increased, indicating central pain sensitization, at least in some patients. Defining this subgroup of patients may be of importance when considering treatment strategies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

活动期类风湿性关节炎女性的疼痛致敏:一项比较横断面研究。
目标。在一些类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者中,关节疼痛持续存在而无炎症迹象。这表明中枢疼痛敏化可能在类风湿性关节炎亚组慢性疼痛的产生中起作用。我们的目的是评估与健康对照(HC)相比,活动性RA女性的外周和中枢性疼痛敏感化程度。方法:38例女性活动期RA (DAS28 > 2.6)和38例女性HC纳入并完成研究。排除标准为多发性神经病、妊娠、无丹麦语。袖带压力测量法测量在优势小腿进行。记录强直性疼痛刺激时的疼痛阈值、疼痛耐受性和疼痛敏感性。结果。活动期RA患者疼痛阈值(p < 0.01)和疼痛耐受性(p < 0.01)明显低于HC患者。RA患者的平均时间累加指数(TS-)为0.98 (SEM: 0.09), HC患者的平均时间累加指数为0.71 (SEM: 0.04) (p < 0.01)。结论。活动期RA患者的压痛阈值较HC患者降低。此外,压力疼痛的时间总和增加,表明中枢疼痛敏感化,至少在一些患者中是这样。在考虑治疗策略时,确定这一亚组患者可能很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书