Serosorting and HIV/STI Infection among HIV-Negative MSM and Transgender People: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis to Inform WHO Guidelines.

Journal of sexually transmitted diseases Pub Date : 2013-01-01 Epub Date: 2013-04-14 DOI:10.1155/2013/583627
Caitlin E Kennedy, Laura J Bernard, Kathryn E Muessig, Kelika A Konda, Elie A Akl, Ying-Ru Lo, Antonio Gerbase, Kevin R O'Reilly
{"title":"Serosorting and HIV/STI Infection among HIV-Negative MSM and Transgender People: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis to Inform WHO Guidelines.","authors":"Caitlin E Kennedy,&nbsp;Laura J Bernard,&nbsp;Kathryn E Muessig,&nbsp;Kelika A Konda,&nbsp;Elie A Akl,&nbsp;Ying-Ru Lo,&nbsp;Antonio Gerbase,&nbsp;Kevin R O'Reilly","doi":"10.1155/2013/583627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the association between serosorting and HIV infection, sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and quality of life among men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender people. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts and abstracted data. Meta-analyses were conducted using random effects models. Of 310 citations reviewed, 4 observational studies, all with MSM, met inclusion criteria. Compared to consistent condom use, serosorting was associated with increased risk of HIV (3 studies, odds ratio (OR): 1.80, 95% confidence interval (CI):1.21-2.70) and bacterial STIs (1 study, OR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.44-1.83). Compared to no condom use, serosorting was associated with reduced risk of HIV (3 studies, OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.25-0.83) and bacterial STIs (1 study, OR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.73-0.91). Among HIV-negative MSM, condom use appears to be more protective against HIV and STIs than serosorting and should be encouraged. However, serosorting may be better than no condom use as a harm reduction strategy. </p>","PeriodicalId":90237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of sexually transmitted diseases","volume":"2013 ","pages":"583627"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/583627","citationCount":"40","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of sexually transmitted diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/583627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/4/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40

Abstract

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the association between serosorting and HIV infection, sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and quality of life among men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender people. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts and abstracted data. Meta-analyses were conducted using random effects models. Of 310 citations reviewed, 4 observational studies, all with MSM, met inclusion criteria. Compared to consistent condom use, serosorting was associated with increased risk of HIV (3 studies, odds ratio (OR): 1.80, 95% confidence interval (CI):1.21-2.70) and bacterial STIs (1 study, OR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.44-1.83). Compared to no condom use, serosorting was associated with reduced risk of HIV (3 studies, OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.25-0.83) and bacterial STIs (1 study, OR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.73-0.91). Among HIV-negative MSM, condom use appears to be more protective against HIV and STIs than serosorting and should be encouraged. However, serosorting may be better than no condom use as a harm reduction strategy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

艾滋病毒阴性男男性行为者和跨性别者的血清分拣和艾滋病毒/性传播感染:为世卫组织指南提供信息的系统评价和荟萃分析。
我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估血清分拣与男男性行为者(MSM)和变性人的HIV感染、性传播感染(STIs)和生活质量之间的关系。两位审稿人独立筛选摘要和抽象数据。采用随机效应模型进行meta分析。在审查的310篇引文中,4项观察性研究均与男男性行为有关,符合纳入标准。与一贯使用避孕套相比,血清分拣与艾滋病毒(3项研究,比值比(OR): 1.80, 95%可信区间(CI):1.21-2.70)和细菌性传播感染(1项研究,比值比(OR): 1.62, 95%可信区间(CI): 1.44-1.83)的风险增加有关。与不使用避孕套相比,血清分选与艾滋病毒(3项研究,OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.25-0.83)和细菌性传播感染(1项研究,OR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.73-0.91)的风险降低有关。在艾滋病毒阴性的男男性行为者中,避孕套的使用似乎比血清检测更能预防艾滋病毒和性传播感染,应该得到鼓励。然而,作为一种减少危害的策略,血清分类可能比不使用避孕套要好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信