Chronotropic incompetence in Chagas disease: effectiveness of blended sensor (volume/minute and accelerometer).

Antonio da Silva Menezes Junior, Aline Pereira da Silva, Giovana Gurian Batista Profahl, Catarine Ottobeli, Jutay Fernando Silva Louzeiro
{"title":"Chronotropic incompetence in Chagas disease: effectiveness of blended sensor (volume/minute and accelerometer).","authors":"Antonio da Silva Menezes Junior, Aline Pereira da Silva, Giovana Gurian Batista Profahl, Catarine Ottobeli, Jutay Fernando Silva Louzeiro","doi":"10.5935/1678-9741.20150035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Technological progress of pacemakers has allowed the association of two or more sensors in one heart rate system response. The accelerometer sensor measures the intensity of the activity; it has a relatively rapid response to the beginning of it, however, it may present insufficient response to less strenuous or of less impact exercise. The minute ventilation sensor changes the pacing rate in response to changes in respiratory frequency in relation to tidal volume, allowing responses to situations of emotional stress and low impact exercises.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the cardiorespiratory response of the accelerometer with respect to the blended sensor (BS=accelerometer sensor+minute ventilation sensor) to exercise in chagasic patients undergoing cardiopulmonary exercise test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, observational, randomized, cross-sectional study. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were selected. The maximum heart rate of the sensor was programmed by age (220-age). The results were analyzed through t test with paired samples (P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sample was comprised of 44 patients, with a mean age of 66±10.4 years, 58% were female, 54% as first implant, in 74% were functional class I and 26% were functional class II, left ventricular ejection fraction was 58±7. As for the cardiopulmonary test, maximum expected heart rate and VO2 were not achieved in both the accelerometer sensor and the blended sensor, however, metabolic equivalent in the blended sensor was higher than the expected, all data with P<0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even though the maximal heart rate was not reached, the blended sensor provided a physiological electrical sequence when compared to the accelerometer sensor, providing better physical fitness test in cardiopulmonary hemodynamics and greater efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":87739,"journal":{"name":"Revista brasileira de cirurgia cardiovascular : orgao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular","volume":"30 3","pages":"311-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4541777/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista brasileira de cirurgia cardiovascular : orgao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/1678-9741.20150035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Technological progress of pacemakers has allowed the association of two or more sensors in one heart rate system response. The accelerometer sensor measures the intensity of the activity; it has a relatively rapid response to the beginning of it, however, it may present insufficient response to less strenuous or of less impact exercise. The minute ventilation sensor changes the pacing rate in response to changes in respiratory frequency in relation to tidal volume, allowing responses to situations of emotional stress and low impact exercises.

Objective: To evaluate the cardiorespiratory response of the accelerometer with respect to the blended sensor (BS=accelerometer sensor+minute ventilation sensor) to exercise in chagasic patients undergoing cardiopulmonary exercise test.

Methods: This was a prospective, observational, randomized, cross-sectional study. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were selected. The maximum heart rate of the sensor was programmed by age (220-age). The results were analyzed through t test with paired samples (P<0.05).

Results: Sample was comprised of 44 patients, with a mean age of 66±10.4 years, 58% were female, 54% as first implant, in 74% were functional class I and 26% were functional class II, left ventricular ejection fraction was 58±7. As for the cardiopulmonary test, maximum expected heart rate and VO2 were not achieved in both the accelerometer sensor and the blended sensor, however, metabolic equivalent in the blended sensor was higher than the expected, all data with P<0.001.

Conclusion: Even though the maximal heart rate was not reached, the blended sensor provided a physiological electrical sequence when compared to the accelerometer sensor, providing better physical fitness test in cardiopulmonary hemodynamics and greater efficiency.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

恰加斯病变时功能不全:混合传感器(体积/分钟和加速度计)的有效性。
导读:心脏起搏器的技术进步使得两个或多个传感器在一个心率系统反应中相互关联成为可能。加速度计传感器测量活动强度;它在开始时有相对快速的反应,然而,它可能对不那么剧烈或影响较小的运动没有足够的反应。微小的通风传感器可以根据与潮汐量相关的呼吸频率变化来改变起搏速率,从而对情绪紧张和低冲击运动的情况做出反应。目的:评价加速度计相对于混合传感器(BS=加速度计传感器+微小通气传感器)在有氧运动试验中的心肺反应。方法:这是一项前瞻性、观察性、随机、横断面研究。选择符合纳入标准的患者。传感器的最大心率按年龄(220岁)编程。结果:样本共44例,平均年龄66±10.4岁,女性占58%,首次植入者占54%,功能I级占74%,功能II级占26%,左室射血分数为58±7。在心肺试验方面,加速度计传感器和混合传感器均未达到最大预期心率和VO2,但混合传感器的代谢当量高于预期,数据均为p。即使没有达到最大心率,与加速度计传感器相比,混合传感器提供了生理电序列,提供了更好的心肺血流动力学体能测试和更高的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书