Effects of low intensity laser irradiation during healing of infected skin wounds in the rat.

Ethne L Nussbaum, Facundo Las Heras, Kenneth P H Pritzker, Tony Mazzulli, Lothar Lilge
{"title":"Effects of low intensity laser irradiation during healing of infected skin wounds in the rat.","authors":"Ethne L Nussbaum,&nbsp;Facundo Las Heras,&nbsp;Kenneth P H Pritzker,&nbsp;Tony Mazzulli,&nbsp;Lothar Lilge","doi":"10.1515/plm-2013-0049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Low intensity laser irradiation remains a controversial treatment for non-healing wounds. This study examines the effect of low intensity light on healing of infected skin wounds in the rat.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Wounds on the rat dorsum were inoculated with <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>. Wounds were irradiated or sham-irradiated three times weekly from day 1 to 19 using 635-nm or 808-nm diode lasers delivering continuous wave (CW) or intensity modulated (3800 Hz) laser radiation, all at radiant exposures of 1 and 20 J/cm<sup>2</sup>. Wound area and bacterial growth on the wound surface were evaluated three times a week. Histological and immunohistochemical analyses were performed at day 8 and 19.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Wounds that were irradiated using a wavelength of 635 nm (1 and 20 J/cm<sup>2</sup>) or intensity modulated 808-nm laser light at 20 J/cm<sup>2</sup> were smaller in area at day 19 than the sham-irradiated controls (achieved significance level=0.0105-0.0208) and were similar to controls in respect of bacterial growth. The remaining light protocols had no effect on wound area at day 19 although they increased <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> growth across the time line compared with controls (<i>p</i><0.0001 to <i>p</i><0.004). CW 808-nm light at 20 J/cm<sup>2</sup> significantly delayed half-heal time. Histological and immunohistochemical analyses supported wound closure findings: improved healing was associated with faster resolution of inflammation during the acute phase and increased signs of late repair at day 19. Significant inflammation was seen at day 19 in all irradiated groups regardless of radiant exposure, except when using 635 nm at 1 J/cm<sup>2</sup>.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Red light improved healing of wounds. Only one 808-nm light protocol enhanced healing; lack of benefit using the remaining 808-nm light protocols may have been due to stimulatory effects of the light on <i>S. aureus</i> growth.</p>","PeriodicalId":20126,"journal":{"name":"Photonics & Lasers in Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/plm-2013-0049","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photonics & Lasers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/plm-2013-0049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Background and objective: Low intensity laser irradiation remains a controversial treatment for non-healing wounds. This study examines the effect of low intensity light on healing of infected skin wounds in the rat.

Materials and methods: Wounds on the rat dorsum were inoculated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Wounds were irradiated or sham-irradiated three times weekly from day 1 to 19 using 635-nm or 808-nm diode lasers delivering continuous wave (CW) or intensity modulated (3800 Hz) laser radiation, all at radiant exposures of 1 and 20 J/cm2. Wound area and bacterial growth on the wound surface were evaluated three times a week. Histological and immunohistochemical analyses were performed at day 8 and 19.

Results: Wounds that were irradiated using a wavelength of 635 nm (1 and 20 J/cm2) or intensity modulated 808-nm laser light at 20 J/cm2 were smaller in area at day 19 than the sham-irradiated controls (achieved significance level=0.0105-0.0208) and were similar to controls in respect of bacterial growth. The remaining light protocols had no effect on wound area at day 19 although they increased Staphylococcus aureus growth across the time line compared with controls (p<0.0001 to p<0.004). CW 808-nm light at 20 J/cm2 significantly delayed half-heal time. Histological and immunohistochemical analyses supported wound closure findings: improved healing was associated with faster resolution of inflammation during the acute phase and increased signs of late repair at day 19. Significant inflammation was seen at day 19 in all irradiated groups regardless of radiant exposure, except when using 635 nm at 1 J/cm2.

Conclusions: Red light improved healing of wounds. Only one 808-nm light protocol enhanced healing; lack of benefit using the remaining 808-nm light protocols may have been due to stimulatory effects of the light on S. aureus growth.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

低强度激光照射对大鼠皮肤感染伤口愈合的影响。
背景与目的:低强度激光照射对未愈合伤口的治疗仍有争议。本研究探讨了低强度光对大鼠感染皮肤伤口愈合的影响。材料与方法:在大鼠背部创面接种铜绿假单胞菌。从第1天到第19天,使用635 nm或808 nm二极管激光器对伤口进行连续波(CW)或强度调制(3800 Hz)激光照射或假照射,每周照射3次,辐射暴露分别为1和20 J/cm2。每周三次评估创面面积及创面细菌生长情况。在第8天和第19天进行组织学和免疫组织化学分析。结果:波长为635 nm(1和20 J/cm2)或强度调制808 nm (20 J/cm2)激光照射创面的创面面积在第19天小于假照射对照组(达到显著性水平=0.0105-0.0208),细菌生长与对照组相似。剩余的光照方案对第19天的伤口面积没有影响,尽管与对照组相比,它们在整个时间线上增加了金黄色葡萄球菌的生长(pp2显著延迟了半愈合时间)。组织学和免疫组织化学分析支持伤口闭合的发现:愈合的改善与急性期炎症的更快消退和第19天晚期修复的迹象增加有关。在第19天,除了使用635 nm、1 J/cm2的辐射照射外,所有辐照组均出现了明显的炎症。结论:红光能促进创面愈合。只有一种808纳米光方案能促进愈合;使用其余808纳米光方案缺乏益处可能是由于光对金黄色葡萄球菌生长的刺激作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信