Identification of clinically relevant Corynebacterium strains by Api Coryne, MALDI-TOF-mass spectrometry and molecular approaches

S. Alibi , A. Ferjani , O. Gaillot , M. Marzouk , R. Courcol , J. Boukadida
{"title":"Identification of clinically relevant Corynebacterium strains by Api Coryne, MALDI-TOF-mass spectrometry and molecular approaches","authors":"S. Alibi ,&nbsp;A. Ferjani ,&nbsp;O. Gaillot ,&nbsp;M. Marzouk ,&nbsp;R. Courcol ,&nbsp;J. Boukadida","doi":"10.1016/j.patbio.2015.07.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We evaluated the Bruker Biotyper matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (MS) for the identification of 97 <em>Corynebacterium</em> clinical in comparison to identification strains by Api Coryne and MALDI-TOF-MS using <em>16S rRNA</em> gene and hypervariable region of <em>rpoB</em> genes sequencing as a reference method. <em>C. striatum</em> was the predominant species isolated followed by <em>C. amycolatum</em>. There was an agreement between Api Coryne strips and MALDI-TOF-MS identification in 88.65% of cases. MALDI-TOF-MS was unable to differentiate <em>C. aurimucosum</em> from <em>C. minutissimum</em> and <em>C. minutissimum</em> from <em>C. singulare</em> but reliably identify 92 of 97 (94.84%) strains. Two strains remained incompletely identified to the species level by MALDI-TOF-MS and molecular approaches. They belonged to <em>Cellulomonas</em> and <em>Pseudoclavibacter</em> genus. In conclusion, MALDI-TOF-MS is a rapid and reliable method for the identification of <em>Corynebacterium</em> species. However, some limits have been noted and have to be resolved by the application of molecular methods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19743,"journal":{"name":"Pathologie-biologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.patbio.2015.07.007","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathologie-biologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0369811415000656","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

Abstract

We evaluated the Bruker Biotyper matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (MS) for the identification of 97 Corynebacterium clinical in comparison to identification strains by Api Coryne and MALDI-TOF-MS using 16S rRNA gene and hypervariable region of rpoB genes sequencing as a reference method. C. striatum was the predominant species isolated followed by C. amycolatum. There was an agreement between Api Coryne strips and MALDI-TOF-MS identification in 88.65% of cases. MALDI-TOF-MS was unable to differentiate C. aurimucosum from C. minutissimum and C. minutissimum from C. singulare but reliably identify 92 of 97 (94.84%) strains. Two strains remained incompletely identified to the species level by MALDI-TOF-MS and molecular approaches. They belonged to Cellulomonas and Pseudoclavibacter genus. In conclusion, MALDI-TOF-MS is a rapid and reliable method for the identification of Corynebacterium species. However, some limits have been noted and have to be resolved by the application of molecular methods.

应用Api Coryne、maldi - tof质谱和分子方法鉴定临床相关棒状杆菌菌株
以16S rRNA基因和rpoB基因高变区测序为参比方法,将Bruker Biotyper基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间(MALDI-TOF)质谱(MS)技术用于97株棒状杆菌临床鉴定,并与Api Coryne和MALDI-TOF-MS鉴定菌株进行比较。纹状体为优势种,其次为扁桃。88.65%的病例Api Coryne试纸与MALDI-TOF-MS鉴定吻合。MALDI-TOF-MS不能区分金黄色葡萄球菌和微小葡萄球菌,微小葡萄球菌和奇异葡萄球菌,但能可靠鉴别97株中的92株(94.84%)。MALDI-TOF-MS和分子鉴定方法仍未完全鉴定出两株菌株。它们属于纤维素单胞菌属和假锁菌属。综上所述,MALDI-TOF-MS是一种快速、可靠的棒状杆菌种类鉴定方法。然而,已经注意到一些限制,必须通过应用分子方法来解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pathologie-biologie
Pathologie-biologie 医学-病理学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信