Use of Pearson's Chi-Square for Testing Equality of Percentile Profiles across Multiple Populations.

William D Johnson, Robbie A Beyl, Jeffrey H Burton, Callie M Johnson, Jacob E Romer, Lei Zhang
{"title":"Use of Pearson's Chi-Square for Testing Equality of Percentile Profiles across Multiple Populations.","authors":"William D Johnson,&nbsp;Robbie A Beyl,&nbsp;Jeffrey H Burton,&nbsp;Callie M Johnson,&nbsp;Jacob E Romer,&nbsp;Lei Zhang","doi":"10.4236/ojs.2015.55043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In large sample studies where distributions may be skewed and not readily transformed to symmetry, it may be of greater interest to compare different distributions in terms of percentiles rather than means. For example, it may be more informative to compare two or more populations with respect to their within population distributions by testing the hypothesis that their corresponding respective 10<sup>th</sup>, 50<sup>th</sup>, and 90<sup>th</sup> percentiles are equal. As a generalization of the median test, the proposed test statistic is asymptotically distributed as Chi-square with degrees of freedom dependent upon the number of percentiles tested and constraints of the null hypothesis. Results from simulation studies are used to validate the nominal 0.05 significance level under the null hypothesis, and asymptotic power properties that are suitable for testing equality of percentile profiles against selected profile discrepancies for a variety of underlying distributions. A pragmatic example is provided to illustrate the comparison of the percentile profiles for four body mass index distributions.</p>","PeriodicalId":59624,"journal":{"name":"统计学期刊(英文)","volume":"5 5","pages":"412-420"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4535814/pdf/","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"统计学期刊(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojs.2015.55043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

In large sample studies where distributions may be skewed and not readily transformed to symmetry, it may be of greater interest to compare different distributions in terms of percentiles rather than means. For example, it may be more informative to compare two or more populations with respect to their within population distributions by testing the hypothesis that their corresponding respective 10th, 50th, and 90th percentiles are equal. As a generalization of the median test, the proposed test statistic is asymptotically distributed as Chi-square with degrees of freedom dependent upon the number of percentiles tested and constraints of the null hypothesis. Results from simulation studies are used to validate the nominal 0.05 significance level under the null hypothesis, and asymptotic power properties that are suitable for testing equality of percentile profiles against selected profile discrepancies for a variety of underlying distributions. A pragmatic example is provided to illustrate the comparison of the percentile profiles for four body mass index distributions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用皮尔逊卡方检验多个种群中百分位分布的平等性。
在大样本研究中,分布可能是倾斜的,而且不容易转化为对称的,用百分位数而不是平均值来比较不同的分布可能更有意义。例如,通过检验两个或多个种群对应的第10、第50和第90百分位数相等的假设,比较它们的种群内分布可能会提供更多信息。作为中位数检验的推广,所提出的检验统计量以卡方形式渐近分布,其自由度取决于所检验的百分位数和原假设的约束。模拟研究的结果用于验证零假设下的名义0.05显著性水平,以及适合于检验百分位数剖面对各种潜在分布的选定剖面差异的平等性的渐近功率特性。提供了一个实用的例子来说明四种身体质量指数分布的百分位数分布的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
571
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信