Enhancing health care non-technical skills: the TINSELS programme.

The clinical teacher Pub Date : 2015-12-01 Epub Date: 2015-07-15 DOI:10.1111/tct.12433
Morris Gordon, Helen Box, Jo-Anne Halliwell, Michael Farrell, Linda Parker, Alison Stewart
{"title":"Enhancing health care non-technical skills: the TINSELS programme.","authors":"Morris Gordon,&nbsp;Helen Box,&nbsp;Jo-Anne Halliwell,&nbsp;Michael Farrell,&nbsp;Linda Parker,&nbsp;Alison Stewart","doi":"10.1111/tct.12433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and context: </strong>Training in 'non-technical skills', i.e. social (communication and teamwork) and cognitive (analytical and personal behaviour) skills, in health care have been of great interest over the last decade. Whereas the majority of publications focus on 'whether' such education can be successful, they overlook 'how' they enhance skills. We designed and piloted a theoretically robust teaching package that addresses non-technical skills in the context of medicine safety through simulation-based interprofessional learning: the Training In Non-technical Skills to Enhance Levels of Medicines Safety (TINSELS) programme.</p><p><strong>Innovation: </strong>A modified Delphi process was completed to identify learning outcomes, and multi-professional teams were recruited through local publicity. The faculty staff developed a three-session simulation-based intervention: firstly, a simulated ward encounter with multiple medicine-related activities; secondly, an extended debriefing and facilitated discussion; and finally, a 'chamber of horrors', where interprofessional teams identified potential sources of error. Each session was completed in the simulation suite with between six and nine participants, lasted approximately 90 minutes and took place over 2 weeks. Full details of the course will be presented to facilitate dissemination. Training in 'non-technical skills' in health care have been of great interest over the last decade</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Feedback was collected on a Likert scale after the course (1, strongly disagree; 5, strongly agree). Mean scores were all greater than 4, with qualitative feedback noting the fidelity of the authentic interprofessional groups. A previously validated safety attitudes questionnaire found changes in attitudes towards handover of care and perceptions of safety in the workplace. An original, simulation-based, multi-professional training programme has been developed with learning and assessment materials available for widespread replication.</p>","PeriodicalId":74987,"journal":{"name":"The clinical teacher","volume":"12 6","pages":"413-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/tct.12433","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The clinical teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.12433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Background and context: Training in 'non-technical skills', i.e. social (communication and teamwork) and cognitive (analytical and personal behaviour) skills, in health care have been of great interest over the last decade. Whereas the majority of publications focus on 'whether' such education can be successful, they overlook 'how' they enhance skills. We designed and piloted a theoretically robust teaching package that addresses non-technical skills in the context of medicine safety through simulation-based interprofessional learning: the Training In Non-technical Skills to Enhance Levels of Medicines Safety (TINSELS) programme.

Innovation: A modified Delphi process was completed to identify learning outcomes, and multi-professional teams were recruited through local publicity. The faculty staff developed a three-session simulation-based intervention: firstly, a simulated ward encounter with multiple medicine-related activities; secondly, an extended debriefing and facilitated discussion; and finally, a 'chamber of horrors', where interprofessional teams identified potential sources of error. Each session was completed in the simulation suite with between six and nine participants, lasted approximately 90 minutes and took place over 2 weeks. Full details of the course will be presented to facilitate dissemination. Training in 'non-technical skills' in health care have been of great interest over the last decade

Implications: Feedback was collected on a Likert scale after the course (1, strongly disagree; 5, strongly agree). Mean scores were all greater than 4, with qualitative feedback noting the fidelity of the authentic interprofessional groups. A previously validated safety attitudes questionnaire found changes in attitudes towards handover of care and perceptions of safety in the workplace. An original, simulation-based, multi-professional training programme has been developed with learning and assessment materials available for widespread replication.

提高保健非技术技能:TINSELS方案。
背景和背景:在过去十年中,医疗保健领域的“非技术技能”培训,即社会(沟通和团队合作)和认知(分析和个人行为)技能,受到极大关注。虽然大多数出版物关注的是这种教育“是否”能够成功,但他们忽视了“如何”提高技能。我们设计并试行了一个理论上强大的教学方案,通过基于模拟的跨专业学习来解决药物安全背景下的非技术技能问题:提高药物安全水平的非技术技能培训(TINSELS)计划。创新:采用改进的德尔菲法确定学习成果,并通过当地宣传招募多专业团队。教职员工开发了一个基于模拟的三阶段干预:首先,模拟病房遇到多种与医学相关的活动;第二,扩大情况汇报和促进讨论;最后,是一个“恐怖室”,由跨专业团队识别潜在的错误来源。每次会议都是在模拟套件中完成的,参与者在6到9人之间,持续约90分钟,持续时间超过2周。课程详情将会公布,以方便传播。在过去的十年中,医疗保健中的“非技术技能”培训受到了极大的关注。含义:课程结束后,以李克特量表收集反馈(1,强烈不同意;5、强烈同意)。平均得分均大于4分,定性反馈注意到真实的跨专业群体的保真度。一份先前经过验证的安全态度问卷发现,人们对工作场所移交护理和安全观念的态度发生了变化。已拟订了一项独创的、以模拟为基础的多专业培训方案,并提供学习和评估材料,供广泛复制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信