Survival analysis following resection of AJCC stage III gallbladder carcinoma based on different combinations of T and N stages.

Kyoung-Yeon Hwang, Young-In Yoon, Shin Hwang, Tae-Yong Ha, Chul-Soo Ahn, Ki-Hun Kim, Deok-Bog Moon, Gi-Won Song, Dong-Hwan Jung, Young-Joo Lee, Kwang-Min Park, Sung-Gyu Lee
{"title":"Survival analysis following resection of AJCC stage III gallbladder carcinoma based on different combinations of T and N stages.","authors":"Kyoung-Yeon Hwang,&nbsp;Young-In Yoon,&nbsp;Shin Hwang,&nbsp;Tae-Yong Ha,&nbsp;Chul-Soo Ahn,&nbsp;Ki-Hun Kim,&nbsp;Deok-Bog Moon,&nbsp;Gi-Won Song,&nbsp;Dong-Hwan Jung,&nbsp;Young-Joo Lee,&nbsp;Kwang-Min Park,&nbsp;Sung-Gyu Lee","doi":"10.14701/kjhbps.2015.19.1.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds/aims: </strong>According to 7th AJCC TNM staging system, gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) with lymph node (LN) metastasis is classified as N1 or N2; thus making the stage IIIB (N1) or IVB (N2). Stage IIIB consists of N1 status with wide coverage of T1-3, but T3N1 group often showed poorer outcomes than T1-2N1 groups. This study intended to assess post-resection prognosis of T3N1 versus other stage III subgroups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We selected 103 patients from our institutional database of GBC who underwent R0 resection between July 1996 and June 2009 and whose GBC was confined to stage T3N0, T1-3N1 or T1-3N2. These patients were stratified into five groups, namely, T3N0 (n=26), T1N1 (n=13), T2N1 (n=35), T3N1 (n=20) and T1-3N2 (n=9), and were followed for ≥5 years or until death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Surgical procedures were minor liver resection (n=53), minor liver resection with bile duct resection (n=23), major liver resection (n=12), major liver resection with bile duct resection (n=5), and hepatopancreatoduodenectomy (n=12). Mean follow-up period was 57.2±68.5 months. Overall 5-year survival rate based on all-cause death and cancer-associated death, respectively, was 57.7% and 60.6% in T3N0, 15.4% and 15.4% in T1N1 (n=13), 28.6% and 28.6% in T2N1 (n=35), 5.0% and 5.7% in T3N1 (n=20), and 22.2% and 22.2% in T1-3N2. The survival outcome of T3N1 group was the poorest among the four stage III groups and was comparable to that of stage IVB (p=0.53).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prognosis of T3N1 GBC is unusually poor even after R0 resection, thus we suggest extensive LN dissection may be necessary in patients with T3 tumors for accurate prognostic evaluation and radical removal of potential nodal micrometastasis. Further validation of this result is necessary in large patient populations from multiple centers.</p>","PeriodicalId":91136,"journal":{"name":"Korean journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"11-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.14701/kjhbps.2015.19.1.11","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14701/kjhbps.2015.19.1.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Backgrounds/aims: According to 7th AJCC TNM staging system, gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) with lymph node (LN) metastasis is classified as N1 or N2; thus making the stage IIIB (N1) or IVB (N2). Stage IIIB consists of N1 status with wide coverage of T1-3, but T3N1 group often showed poorer outcomes than T1-2N1 groups. This study intended to assess post-resection prognosis of T3N1 versus other stage III subgroups.

Methods: We selected 103 patients from our institutional database of GBC who underwent R0 resection between July 1996 and June 2009 and whose GBC was confined to stage T3N0, T1-3N1 or T1-3N2. These patients were stratified into five groups, namely, T3N0 (n=26), T1N1 (n=13), T2N1 (n=35), T3N1 (n=20) and T1-3N2 (n=9), and were followed for ≥5 years or until death.

Results: Surgical procedures were minor liver resection (n=53), minor liver resection with bile duct resection (n=23), major liver resection (n=12), major liver resection with bile duct resection (n=5), and hepatopancreatoduodenectomy (n=12). Mean follow-up period was 57.2±68.5 months. Overall 5-year survival rate based on all-cause death and cancer-associated death, respectively, was 57.7% and 60.6% in T3N0, 15.4% and 15.4% in T1N1 (n=13), 28.6% and 28.6% in T2N1 (n=35), 5.0% and 5.7% in T3N1 (n=20), and 22.2% and 22.2% in T1-3N2. The survival outcome of T3N1 group was the poorest among the four stage III groups and was comparable to that of stage IVB (p=0.53).

Conclusions: The prognosis of T3N1 GBC is unusually poor even after R0 resection, thus we suggest extensive LN dissection may be necessary in patients with T3 tumors for accurate prognostic evaluation and radical removal of potential nodal micrometastasis. Further validation of this result is necessary in large patient populations from multiple centers.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于不同T期和N期组合的AJCC III期胆囊癌切除术后生存分析。
背景/目的:根据第七期AJCC TNM分期系统,胆囊癌合并淋巴结转移分为N1或N2;从而形成IIIB (N1)或IVB (N2)阶段。IIIB期包括N1状态,广泛覆盖T1-3,但T3N1组往往比T1-2N1组预后差。本研究旨在评估T3N1与其他III期亚组的术后预后。方法:我们从1996年7月至2009年6月的GBC机构数据库中选择103例GBC患者,他们接受了R0切除术,GBC局限于T3N0、T1-3N1或T1-3N2期。将患者分为T3N0 (n=26)、T1N1 (n=13)、tt2n1 (n=35)、T3N1 (n=20)、T1-3N2 (n=9) 5组,随访≥5年至死亡。结果:手术方式为肝小切除(53例)、肝小切除合并胆管切除(23例)、肝大切除(12例)、肝大切除合并胆管切除(5例)、肝胰十二指肠切除术(12例)。平均随访时间57.2±68.5个月。基于全因死亡和癌症相关死亡的总5年生存率分别为:T3N1为57.7%和60.6%,T1N1为15.4%和15.4% (n=13), T2N1为28.6%和28.6% (n=35), T3N1为5.0%和5.7% (n=20), T1-3N2为22.2%和22.2%。T3N1组的生存结局在4个III期组中最差,与IVB期相当(p=0.53)。结论:T3N1 GBC即使在R0切除后预后也异常差,因此我们建议T3肿瘤患者进行广泛的LN清扫,以准确评估预后并根治潜在的淋巴结微转移。需要在来自多个中心的大量患者群体中进一步验证这一结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书