Synthetic Cannabinoids and Cathinones: Prevalence and Markets.

Q1 Social Sciences
Forensic Science Review Pub Date : 2013-03-01
A L Bretteville-Jensen, S S Tuv, O R Bilgrei, B Fjeld, L Bachs
{"title":"Synthetic Cannabinoids and Cathinones: Prevalence and Markets.","authors":"A L Bretteville-Jensen,&nbsp;S S Tuv,&nbsp;O R Bilgrei,&nbsp;B Fjeld,&nbsp;L Bachs","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the past few years, the phenomenon of new designer drugs has attracted much attention. Synthetic cannabinoids and cathinones are the two main classes of these drugs. Both are potent drugs of abuse, and several cases of severe toxicity and deaths are reported. The present work is based on a systematic review of studies that have assessed the market and prevalence of synthetic cannabinoids and cathinones, and integrates pharmacological, sociological, and epidemiological aspects of these two groups of emerging synthetic drugs. The review reflects that the Internet has made synthetic cannabinoids and cathinones widely available. Furthermore, aggressive and widespread marketing, as well as the low price level of these drugs, their juridical status and their lack of detection on standard drug tests may serve as major motivations for drug use. The number of prevalence studies is small and derived from a limited number of countries. In spite of the many methodological shortcomings, some conclusions may be cautiously drawn. Taken together, the results point toward higher prevalence of use for synthetic cathinones than for synthetic cannabinoids. In the general population, the prevalence of use of synthetic cathinones is reported to be around 4% compared to figures lower than 1% for synthetic cannabinoids. Among students, the prevalence varies from 1-20% for synthetic cathinones and 2-10% for synthetic cannabinoids. Among groups with high rates of drug use, the prevalence varies between 4% to more than 60% for synthetic cathinones and around 10% for synthetic cannabinoids. </p>","PeriodicalId":38192,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Science Review","volume":"25 1-2","pages":"7-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past few years, the phenomenon of new designer drugs has attracted much attention. Synthetic cannabinoids and cathinones are the two main classes of these drugs. Both are potent drugs of abuse, and several cases of severe toxicity and deaths are reported. The present work is based on a systematic review of studies that have assessed the market and prevalence of synthetic cannabinoids and cathinones, and integrates pharmacological, sociological, and epidemiological aspects of these two groups of emerging synthetic drugs. The review reflects that the Internet has made synthetic cannabinoids and cathinones widely available. Furthermore, aggressive and widespread marketing, as well as the low price level of these drugs, their juridical status and their lack of detection on standard drug tests may serve as major motivations for drug use. The number of prevalence studies is small and derived from a limited number of countries. In spite of the many methodological shortcomings, some conclusions may be cautiously drawn. Taken together, the results point toward higher prevalence of use for synthetic cathinones than for synthetic cannabinoids. In the general population, the prevalence of use of synthetic cathinones is reported to be around 4% compared to figures lower than 1% for synthetic cannabinoids. Among students, the prevalence varies from 1-20% for synthetic cathinones and 2-10% for synthetic cannabinoids. Among groups with high rates of drug use, the prevalence varies between 4% to more than 60% for synthetic cathinones and around 10% for synthetic cannabinoids.

合成大麻素和卡西酮:流行和市场。
在过去的几年里,新设计药物的现象引起了人们的广泛关注。合成大麻素和卡西酮是这类药物的两大类。这两种药物都是强效滥用药物,据报道有几起严重中毒和死亡的病例。目前的工作是基于对研究的系统回顾,这些研究评估了合成大麻素和卡西酮的市场和流行程度,并整合了这两组新兴合成药物的药理学、社会学和流行病学方面的研究。该审查反映了互联网已使合成大麻素和卡西酮广泛可用。此外,积极和广泛的销售以及这些药物的低价格水平、它们的法律地位以及标准药物测试无法检测到它们可能是吸毒的主要动机。流行病学研究的数量很少,而且来自数量有限的国家。尽管在方法上有许多缺点,但可以谨慎地得出一些结论。综上所述,结果表明合成卡西酮的使用率高于合成大麻素。据报道,在一般人群中,合成卡西酮的使用率约为4%,而合成大麻素的使用率低于1%。在学生中,合成卡西酮的患病率为1-20%,合成大麻素的患病率为2-10%。在药物使用率高的群体中,合成卡西酮的患病率从4%到60%以上不等,合成大麻素的患病率约为10%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forensic Science Review
Forensic Science Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信