Participants' Perceptions of Deep Brain Stimulation Research for Treatment-Resistant Depression: Risks, Benefits, and Therapeutic Misconception.

Yan Leykin, Paul P Christopher, Paul E Holtzheimer, Paul S Appelbaum, Helen S Mayberg, Sarah H Lisanby, Laura B Dunn
{"title":"Participants' Perceptions of Deep Brain Stimulation Research for Treatment-Resistant Depression: Risks, Benefits, and Therapeutic Misconception.","authors":"Yan Leykin,&nbsp;Paul P Christopher,&nbsp;Paul E Holtzheimer,&nbsp;Paul S Appelbaum,&nbsp;Helen S Mayberg,&nbsp;Sarah H Lisanby,&nbsp;Laura B Dunn","doi":"10.1080/21507716.2011.627579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deep brain stimulation (DBS) for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is the focus of great interest and numerous studies. Given the state of this research, the risks of DBS, the uncertainty of direct benefits, and the potential for therapeutic misconception (TM), examination of research participants' perspectives is critical to addressing concerns about the adequacy of consent among people with TRD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among 31 participants considering DBS studies at two sites, self-report questionnaires were used to examine three dimensions of TM (eight true/false items). Additional Likert-scale items assessed perceptions of risks, potential benefits, and altruistic motivations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants correctly identified the surgery itself as the riskiest study procedure, although only four participants rated the surgery as \"high risk.\" Most participants rated the entire DBS study as \"moderate\" or lower risk. Participants rated the likelihood of others benefiting in the future more strongly than they did the likelihood of personal benefit. Participants held positive attitudes toward research, and were moderately altruistic. Nearly two-thirds of the 31 participants (64.5%) answered at least one of the true/false TM items incorrectly.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Individuals considering DBS studies for TRD demonstrated reasonable perceptions of risks and benefits, distinguished among procedural risks, and expressed hopes for personal benefit as well as altruism. Findings related to TM were mixed: Participants understood the experimental stage of DBS for depression and endorsed the possibility of no personal benefit, yet there was some evidence for TM. Although these findings are reassuring, investigators must nevertheless remain vigilant about identifying and addressing potential misconceptions.</p>","PeriodicalId":89316,"journal":{"name":"AJOB primary research","volume":"2 4","pages":"33-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21507716.2011.627579","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOB primary research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21507716.2011.627579","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is the focus of great interest and numerous studies. Given the state of this research, the risks of DBS, the uncertainty of direct benefits, and the potential for therapeutic misconception (TM), examination of research participants' perspectives is critical to addressing concerns about the adequacy of consent among people with TRD.

Methods: Among 31 participants considering DBS studies at two sites, self-report questionnaires were used to examine three dimensions of TM (eight true/false items). Additional Likert-scale items assessed perceptions of risks, potential benefits, and altruistic motivations.

Results: Participants correctly identified the surgery itself as the riskiest study procedure, although only four participants rated the surgery as "high risk." Most participants rated the entire DBS study as "moderate" or lower risk. Participants rated the likelihood of others benefiting in the future more strongly than they did the likelihood of personal benefit. Participants held positive attitudes toward research, and were moderately altruistic. Nearly two-thirds of the 31 participants (64.5%) answered at least one of the true/false TM items incorrectly.

Conclusions: Individuals considering DBS studies for TRD demonstrated reasonable perceptions of risks and benefits, distinguished among procedural risks, and expressed hopes for personal benefit as well as altruism. Findings related to TM were mixed: Participants understood the experimental stage of DBS for depression and endorsed the possibility of no personal benefit, yet there was some evidence for TM. Although these findings are reassuring, investigators must nevertheless remain vigilant about identifying and addressing potential misconceptions.

参与者对治疗难治性抑郁症的深部脑刺激研究的看法:风险、益处和治疗误解。
背景:脑深部电刺激(DBS)治疗难治性抑郁症(TRD)是一个备受关注和众多研究的焦点。鉴于本研究的现状、DBS的风险、直接获益的不确定性以及治疗误解(TM)的可能性,检查研究参与者的观点对于解决TRD患者是否充分同意的问题至关重要。方法:对31名在两个地点考虑进行DBS研究的被试,采用自述问卷对TM的三个维度(8个真假项目)进行检验。额外的李克特量表项目评估了对风险、潜在利益和利他动机的看法。结果:尽管只有四名参与者将手术评为“高风险”,但参与者正确地将手术本身确定为最危险的研究过程。大多数参与者将整个DBS研究评为“中等”或较低风险。参与者对他人在未来获益的可能性的评价比对个人获益的可能性的评价更强烈。参与者对研究持积极态度,并且适度利他。近三分之二的31名参与者(64.5%)至少回答了一个正确/错误的TM项目。结论:考虑DBS研究进行TRD的个体表现出合理的风险和收益感知,区分了程序性风险,并表达了对个人利益和利他主义的希望。与冥想相关的发现是混合的:参与者理解DBS治疗抑郁症的实验阶段,并认可可能没有个人益处,但有一些证据表明冥想有益。尽管这些发现令人放心,但调查人员必须保持警惕,以识别和解决潜在的误解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信