Depression Prevention for Early Adolescent Girls: A Pilot Study of All Girls Versus Co-Ed Groups.

Tara M Chaplin, Jane E Gillham, Karen Reivich, Andrea G L Elkon, Barbra Samuels, Derek R Freres, Breanna Winder, Martin E P Seligman
{"title":"Depression Prevention for Early Adolescent Girls: A Pilot Study of All Girls Versus Co-Ed Groups.","authors":"Tara M Chaplin,&nbsp;Jane E Gillham,&nbsp;Karen Reivich,&nbsp;Andrea G L Elkon,&nbsp;Barbra Samuels,&nbsp;Derek R Freres,&nbsp;Breanna Winder,&nbsp;Martin E P Seligman","doi":"10.1177/0272431605282655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Given the dramatic increase in depression that occurs during early adolescence in girls, interventions must address the needs of girls. The authors examined whether a depression prevention program, the Penn Resiliency Program, was more effective for girls in all-girls groups than in co-ed groups. Within co-ed groups, the authors also tested whether there were greater effects for boys than for girls. Participants were 208 11- to 14-year-olds. Girls were randomly assigned to all-girls groups, co-ed groups, or control. Boys were assigned to co-ed groups or control. Students completed questionnaires on depressive symptoms, hopelessness, and explanatory style before and after the intervention. Girls groups were better than co-ed groups in reducing girls'hopelessness and for session attendance rates but were similar to co-ed groups in reducing depressive symptoms. Co-ed groups decreased depressive symptoms, but this did not differ by gender. Findings support prevention programs and suggest additional benefits of girls groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":509963,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Early Adolescence","volume":"26 1","pages":"110-126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0272431605282655","citationCount":"84","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Early Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431605282655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 84

Abstract

Given the dramatic increase in depression that occurs during early adolescence in girls, interventions must address the needs of girls. The authors examined whether a depression prevention program, the Penn Resiliency Program, was more effective for girls in all-girls groups than in co-ed groups. Within co-ed groups, the authors also tested whether there were greater effects for boys than for girls. Participants were 208 11- to 14-year-olds. Girls were randomly assigned to all-girls groups, co-ed groups, or control. Boys were assigned to co-ed groups or control. Students completed questionnaires on depressive symptoms, hopelessness, and explanatory style before and after the intervention. Girls groups were better than co-ed groups in reducing girls'hopelessness and for session attendance rates but were similar to co-ed groups in reducing depressive symptoms. Co-ed groups decreased depressive symptoms, but this did not differ by gender. Findings support prevention programs and suggest additional benefits of girls groups.

早期青春期女孩的抑郁症预防:一项针对所有女孩与男女同校群体的初步研究。
鉴于女孩在青春期早期出现的抑郁症急剧增加,干预措施必须解决女孩的需求。研究人员调查了一项名为宾夕法尼亚大学弹性计划(Penn Resiliency program)的抑郁症预防项目,该项目对女生团体中的女生是否比男女同校的女生更有效。在男女同校的群体中,作者还测试了是否男孩比女孩受到更大的影响。参与者是208名11至14岁的孩子。女孩们被随机分配到全女生组、男女混合组或对照组。男孩被分配到男女混合组或对照组。学生在干预前后完成了抑郁症状、绝望感和解释风格的问卷调查。女生组在减少女孩的绝望感和会议出勤率方面优于男女同校组,但在减少抑郁症状方面与男女同校组相似。男女同校的小组减轻了抑郁症状,但这没有性别差异。研究结果支持预防项目,并提出了女孩团体的额外好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信