Retrospective Analysis of Thoracolumbar Junction Injuries Using the Thoracolumbar Injury Severity and Classification Score, American Spinal Injury Association Class, Injury Severity Score, Age, Sex, and Length of Hospitalization.

Q Medicine
Shah-Nawaz M Dodwad, Shah-Jahan M Dodwad, Ronald Wisneski, Safdar N Khan
{"title":"Retrospective Analysis of Thoracolumbar Junction Injuries Using the Thoracolumbar Injury Severity and Classification Score, American Spinal Injury Association Class, Injury Severity Score, Age, Sex, and Length of Hospitalization.","authors":"Shah-Nawaz M Dodwad,&nbsp;Shah-Jahan M Dodwad,&nbsp;Ronald Wisneski,&nbsp;Safdar N Khan","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182a14743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective review of patient cohort.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our goal was to assess the validity of the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity (TLICS) score system by comparing the TLICS system to prior management of thoracolumbar injuries at our institution between January 1, 2006 to March 31, 2011.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>TLICS was introduced in 2005 to classify and assign treatment recommendations for injuries based on 3 axes: mechanism of injury, integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex, and neurological status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively obtained and analyzed patient data regarding thoracolumbar junction injuries at a major academic medical center servicing level I trauma. In addition, we compared the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) class at time of injury to last follow-up to determine if there was any change in neurological status after intervention. We also compared sex, injury severity score (ISS), length of hospitalization, and age between nonoperatively and operatively treated patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Included in our study were 201 patients (70% male and 30% female). We found the TLICS system agreed with prior thoracolumbar junction injury management at our institution 98% of the time in nonoperatively treated patients and 78% of the time in operatively treated patients. Age, sex, and ISS were not statistically significant factors in patients who were treated operatively versus nonoperatively, however, there was a trend towards higher ISS in operatively treated patients. Average TLICS score between nonoperative and operative groups was 1.56 and 4.8, respectively, and was a statistically significant difference. There was no statistically significant difference in ASIA class improvement between operative and nonoperative treatment, however, this is likely because of having only 20 patients in this subcohort. Of note, about 50% of the 17 operatively treated patients had improvement in ASIA class.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data suggest that TLICS is a valuable tool in a spine surgeon's armamentarium in treating thoracolumbar junction injuries. Some surgeons might be more likely to operate on thoracolumbar junction injuries that should be treated nonoperatively according to the TLICS score. As with all classification schemes, the TLICS system should be used in conjunction with sound clinical judgment.</p>","PeriodicalId":50043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques","volume":"28 7","pages":"E410-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182a14743","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182a14743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective review of patient cohort.

Objective: Our goal was to assess the validity of the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity (TLICS) score system by comparing the TLICS system to prior management of thoracolumbar injuries at our institution between January 1, 2006 to March 31, 2011.

Summary of background data: TLICS was introduced in 2005 to classify and assign treatment recommendations for injuries based on 3 axes: mechanism of injury, integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex, and neurological status.

Methods: We retrospectively obtained and analyzed patient data regarding thoracolumbar junction injuries at a major academic medical center servicing level I trauma. In addition, we compared the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) class at time of injury to last follow-up to determine if there was any change in neurological status after intervention. We also compared sex, injury severity score (ISS), length of hospitalization, and age between nonoperatively and operatively treated patients.

Results: Included in our study were 201 patients (70% male and 30% female). We found the TLICS system agreed with prior thoracolumbar junction injury management at our institution 98% of the time in nonoperatively treated patients and 78% of the time in operatively treated patients. Age, sex, and ISS were not statistically significant factors in patients who were treated operatively versus nonoperatively, however, there was a trend towards higher ISS in operatively treated patients. Average TLICS score between nonoperative and operative groups was 1.56 and 4.8, respectively, and was a statistically significant difference. There was no statistically significant difference in ASIA class improvement between operative and nonoperative treatment, however, this is likely because of having only 20 patients in this subcohort. Of note, about 50% of the 17 operatively treated patients had improvement in ASIA class.

Conclusions: Our data suggest that TLICS is a valuable tool in a spine surgeon's armamentarium in treating thoracolumbar junction injuries. Some surgeons might be more likely to operate on thoracolumbar junction injuries that should be treated nonoperatively according to the TLICS score. As with all classification schemes, the TLICS system should be used in conjunction with sound clinical judgment.

使用胸腰椎损伤严重程度和分类评分、美国脊髓损伤协会分类、损伤严重程度评分、年龄、性别和住院时间对胸腰椎连接处损伤进行回顾性分析。
研究设计:对患者队列进行回顾性分析。目的:我们的目的是通过比较TLICS系统与我院2006年1月1日至2011年3月31日期间胸腰椎损伤的既往管理,评估TLICS系统的有效性。背景资料摘要:TLICS于2005年引入,基于3个轴对损伤进行分类和分配治疗建议:损伤机制、后韧带复合体的完整性和神经状态。方法:我们回顾性地获得并分析了一家主要学术医疗中心治疗一级创伤的胸腰段连接处损伤的患者资料。此外,我们比较了损伤时美国脊髓损伤协会(ASIA)分类与最后一次随访,以确定干预后神经状态是否有任何改变。我们还比较了非手术和手术患者的性别、损伤严重程度评分(ISS)、住院时间和年龄。结果:纳入201例患者(男性70%,女性30%)。我们发现,在我们的机构中,98%的非手术治疗患者和78%的手术治疗患者的TLICS系统与先前的胸腰段连接处损伤管理一致。年龄、性别和ISS在手术治疗与非手术治疗的患者中没有统计学意义,然而,手术治疗的患者有更高ISS的趋势。非手术组与手术组TLICS平均评分分别为1.56分和4.8分,差异有统计学意义。手术和非手术治疗在ASIA分级改善方面没有统计学上的显著差异,然而,这可能是因为该亚队列中只有20例患者。值得注意的是,在17例手术治疗的患者中,约50%的患者在ASIA级有改善。结论:我们的数据表明,在脊柱外科医生的设备中,TLICS是治疗胸腰椎连接处损伤的一种有价值的工具。根据TLICS评分,一些外科医生可能更倾向于对胸腰椎连接处损伤进行非手术治疗。与所有分类方案一样,TLICS系统应结合合理的临床判断来使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.16
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques features peer-reviewed original articles on diagnosis, management, and surgery for spinal problems. Topics include degenerative disorders, spinal trauma, diagnostic anesthetic blocks, metastatic tumor spinal replacements, management of pain syndromes, and the use of imaging techniques in evaluating lumbar spine disorder. The journal also presents thoroughly documented case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书