Contraindications to kidney transplantation: uneven grounds?

Transplantation research Pub Date : 2015-07-21 eCollection Date: 2015-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s13737-015-0024-x
Bryce A Kiberd, Meteb M AlBugami, Romuald Panek, Karthik Tennankore
{"title":"Contraindications to kidney transplantation: uneven grounds?","authors":"Bryce A Kiberd,&nbsp;Meteb M AlBugami,&nbsp;Romuald Panek,&nbsp;Karthik Tennankore","doi":"10.1186/s13737-015-0024-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Determining eligibility for a kidney transplant is an important decision. Practice guidelines define contraindications to transplantation; however many are not evidence based. Canadian guidelines recommend that patients unlikely to survive the wait period not be evaluated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate what proportion of patients with a contraindication would survive the wait time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive incident dialysis patients (January 2006 to December 2012) with a contraindication, defined using Canadian guidelines, were studied. Mortality rates were determined for each individual contraindication. Theoretical survival to the median wait time to transplantation was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 746 incident patients, 435 (58 %) were deemed to have a contraindication at dialysis start. Nearly 80 % had a contraindication with a high mortality rate (dementia, multisystem disease, etc.). Patients with high mortality rates were less likely to survive the wait list than be transplanted. Patients with non-adherence, obesity, and potentially reversible disease had relatively low mortality rates, were more likely to survive, and possibly be transplanted at a time with the prospect of a better outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study gives some credence that many patients with a contraindication are not likely to benefit. A better framework of defining contraindications is needed to allow better decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":89864,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation research","volume":"4 ","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13737-015-0024-x","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13737-015-0024-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background: Determining eligibility for a kidney transplant is an important decision. Practice guidelines define contraindications to transplantation; however many are not evidence based. Canadian guidelines recommend that patients unlikely to survive the wait period not be evaluated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate what proportion of patients with a contraindication would survive the wait time.

Methods: Consecutive incident dialysis patients (January 2006 to December 2012) with a contraindication, defined using Canadian guidelines, were studied. Mortality rates were determined for each individual contraindication. Theoretical survival to the median wait time to transplantation was calculated.

Results: Of 746 incident patients, 435 (58 %) were deemed to have a contraindication at dialysis start. Nearly 80 % had a contraindication with a high mortality rate (dementia, multisystem disease, etc.). Patients with high mortality rates were less likely to survive the wait list than be transplanted. Patients with non-adherence, obesity, and potentially reversible disease had relatively low mortality rates, were more likely to survive, and possibly be transplanted at a time with the prospect of a better outcome.

Conclusions: This study gives some credence that many patients with a contraindication are not likely to benefit. A better framework of defining contraindications is needed to allow better decision-making.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

肾移植的禁忌症:不平整的地面?
背景:确定肾脏移植的资格是一个重要的决定。实践指南明确了移植的禁忌症;然而,许多都是没有证据的。加拿大指南建议,不太可能在等待期存活的患者不进行评估。本研究的目的是评估有禁忌症的患者在等待时间内存活的比例。方法:对2006年1月至2012年12月有加拿大指南定义的禁忌症的连续透析患者进行研究。确定了每个禁忌症的死亡率。计算理论生存时间和移植等待时间的中位数。结果:746例患者中,435例(58%)在透析开始时被认为有禁忌症。近80%有死亡率高的禁忌症(痴呆、多系统疾病等)。死亡率高的患者在等待名单上存活的可能性比移植的可能性要小。患有不依从性、肥胖和潜在可逆性疾病的患者死亡率相对较低,更有可能存活下来,并且可能在移植时获得更好的结果。结论:这项研究为许多有禁忌症的患者不太可能受益提供了一些证据。需要一个更好的定义禁忌症的框架,以便更好地决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信