A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Dexamethasone as an Adjuvant in Ultrasound-Guided Bilateral Superficial Cervical Plexus Block using 0.25% Bupivacaine in Patients Undergoing Thyroid Surgeries under Entropy-Guided General Anesthesia.

Anesthesia, Essays and Researches Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-06 DOI:10.4103/aer.aer_85_21
M N Satish Kumar, M Archana, V P Dayananda, C Surekha, R Ramachandraiah
{"title":"A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Dexamethasone as an Adjuvant in Ultrasound-Guided Bilateral Superficial Cervical Plexus Block using 0.25% Bupivacaine in Patients Undergoing Thyroid Surgeries under Entropy-Guided General Anesthesia.","authors":"M N Satish Kumar,&nbsp;M Archana,&nbsp;V P Dayananda,&nbsp;C Surekha,&nbsp;R Ramachandraiah","doi":"10.4103/aer.aer_85_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Ultrasound-guided bilateral superficial cervical plexus block (BSCPB) is a technique described for thyroid surgeries for postoperative analgesia as the surgery can cause severe pain and discomfort. Perineural dexamethasone is known to prolong analgesic duration and reduce postoperative nausea/vomiting.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess the efficacy of dexamethasone as an adjuvant to BSCPB with 0.25% bupivacaine on isoflurane consumption, intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing thyroid surgeries under general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>This was a randomized control trial.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>Eighty patients were randomized to two equal groups using random number table into Group A with BSCPB receiving 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine and Group B with BSCPB receiving 19 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine + injection dexamethasone 4 mg in the preinduction period. Hemodynamic parameters, isoflurane consumption, postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score, and antiemetic effect over 24 h were compared between two groups.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>Microsoft excel data sheet, Chi-square test, and independent <i>t</i>-test were used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intraoperative hemodynamic parameters were comparable between the two groups. There was a significant difference in mean VAS score between two groups from 6 h to 20 h postoperatively. The time of rescue analgesic in Group A was 7.09 ± 1.04 min and Group was 13.19 ± 1.46 min with <i>P</i> < 0.0001. In Group A, 40% had nausea and 35% had vomiting, and in Group B, 7.5% had nausea and 5% had vomiting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preinduction ultrasound-guided BSCPB with bupivacaine and dexamethasone provides longer duration of postoperative analgesia and lesser nausea and vomiting compared to bupivacaine alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":7798,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches","volume":"16 1","pages":"127-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9558673/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_85_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Ultrasound-guided bilateral superficial cervical plexus block (BSCPB) is a technique described for thyroid surgeries for postoperative analgesia as the surgery can cause severe pain and discomfort. Perineural dexamethasone is known to prolong analgesic duration and reduce postoperative nausea/vomiting.

Aims: To assess the efficacy of dexamethasone as an adjuvant to BSCPB with 0.25% bupivacaine on isoflurane consumption, intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing thyroid surgeries under general anesthesia.

Settings and design: This was a randomized control trial.

Subjects and methods: Eighty patients were randomized to two equal groups using random number table into Group A with BSCPB receiving 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine and Group B with BSCPB receiving 19 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine + injection dexamethasone 4 mg in the preinduction period. Hemodynamic parameters, isoflurane consumption, postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score, and antiemetic effect over 24 h were compared between two groups.

Statistical analysis used: Microsoft excel data sheet, Chi-square test, and independent t-test were used for statistical analysis.

Results: The intraoperative hemodynamic parameters were comparable between the two groups. There was a significant difference in mean VAS score between two groups from 6 h to 20 h postoperatively. The time of rescue analgesic in Group A was 7.09 ± 1.04 min and Group was 13.19 ± 1.46 min with P < 0.0001. In Group A, 40% had nausea and 35% had vomiting, and in Group B, 7.5% had nausea and 5% had vomiting.

Conclusions: Preinduction ultrasound-guided BSCPB with bupivacaine and dexamethasone provides longer duration of postoperative analgesia and lesser nausea and vomiting compared to bupivacaine alone.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

评价地塞米松辅助0.25%布比卡因超声引导双侧颈浅丛阻滞在熵引导全麻下甲状腺手术患者中的疗效
背景:超声引导双侧颈浅丛阻滞(BSCPB)是一种用于甲状腺手术术后镇痛的技术,因为手术会引起严重的疼痛和不适。已知神经周地塞米松可延长镇痛时间并减少术后恶心/呕吐。目的:评价地塞米松辅助0.25%布比卡因BSCPB对全麻下甲状腺手术患者异氟烷消耗、术中血流动力学参数和术后镇痛的影响。设置和设计:这是一项随机对照试验。对象和方法:80例患者采用随机数字表法随机分为两组,A组患者接受0.25%布比卡因20 mL, B组患者接受0.25%布比卡因19 mL +注射地塞米松4 mg。比较两组患者血液动力学参数、异氟醚消耗量、术后视觉模拟评分(VAS)及24 h止吐效果。统计分析方法:采用Microsoft excel数据表、卡方检验、独立t检验进行统计分析。结果:两组患者术中血流动力学参数具有可比性。两组患者术后6 ~ 20 h VAS评分差异有统计学意义。A组抢救镇痛时间为7.09±1.04 min, A组为13.19±1.46 min, P < 0.0001。A组40%恶心,35%呕吐,B组7.5%恶心,5%呕吐。结论:与单独布比卡因相比,超声引导下布比卡因联合地塞米松的BSCPB术后镇痛持续时间更长,恶心和呕吐更少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信