Monitoring the effect of TNF-alpha inhibitors on laboratory parameters and adverse effects in different diseases: a retrospective, single-center study.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Annals of Saudi Medicine Pub Date : 2022-09-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-06 DOI:10.5144/0256-4947.2022.309
Abdulaziz N Madani, Fahad M Al-Saif, Lama R Alzamil, Aljohara M Almazroua, Nuha A Alfurayh, Sara D Aldokhayel, Qais A Almuhaideb, Nouf S Alballa, Nujud A Daham, Abdulrahman A Alkharashi
{"title":"Monitoring the effect of TNF-alpha inhibitors on laboratory parameters and adverse effects in different diseases: a retrospective, single-center study.","authors":"Abdulaziz N Madani,&nbsp;Fahad M Al-Saif,&nbsp;Lama R Alzamil,&nbsp;Aljohara M Almazroua,&nbsp;Nuha A Alfurayh,&nbsp;Sara D Aldokhayel,&nbsp;Qais A Almuhaideb,&nbsp;Nouf S Alballa,&nbsp;Nujud A Daham,&nbsp;Abdulrahman A Alkharashi","doi":"10.5144/0256-4947.2022.309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The introduction of biological treatments has revolutionized the management of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Multiple clinical trials have established the efficacy of biological agents in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Nevertheless, there are no clear indications for optimal monitoring intervals during treatment.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Collect and analyze laboratory evaluation data from patients receiving biological therapy to provide a better understanding of the need for laboratory investigations before and during treatment with biological agents, and to analyze adverse events and other factors.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort SETTINGS: Tertiary care center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Data were collected from the electronic medical records of patients attending the dermatology, rheumatology, and gastroenterology clinics from June 2014 to June 2019. The laboratory parameters of patients who have received one of the TNF-alpha inhibitors (adalimumab, etanercept, or infliximab) were collected starting at baseline and up to at least one year from treatment initiation.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The time points at which patients developed significantly abnormal laboratory results during treatment with one of the TNF-alpha inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Sample size: </strong>250 patients RESULTS: Most patients were treated with adalimumab (38.4%); a similar proportion (38%) with infliximab, whereas only 23.6% were treated with etanercept. The majority of the significant abnormal laboratory results occurred at baseline, 3-6 and 9-12 months. Most abnormalities were among patients using infliximab, followed by etanercept, and then adalimumab. The median number of laboratory abnormalities for dermatology patients was significantly lower than that for gastroenterology patients (<i>P</i><.001), and for rheumatology patients (<i>P</i>=.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Because dermatology patients showed a lower median number of laboratory abnormalities than patients treated by other specialties in our study, we believe that dermatology patients require less frequent laboratory monitoring. Therefore, we recommend laboratory evaluation at baseline, after 3-6 months, 1 year from the beginning of treatment, and annually thereafter for patients using TNF-alpha inhibitor agents. However, more frequent testing might be warranted according to patient comorbidities, concomitant medications, and physician judgment.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Single center and retrospective design.</p><p><strong>Conflict of interest: </strong>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":8016,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Saudi Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6d/17/0256-4947.2022.309.PMC9557780.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Saudi Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2022.309","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The introduction of biological treatments has revolutionized the management of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Multiple clinical trials have established the efficacy of biological agents in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Nevertheless, there are no clear indications for optimal monitoring intervals during treatment.

Objectives: Collect and analyze laboratory evaluation data from patients receiving biological therapy to provide a better understanding of the need for laboratory investigations before and during treatment with biological agents, and to analyze adverse events and other factors.

Design: Retrospective cohort SETTINGS: Tertiary care center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Patients and methods: Data were collected from the electronic medical records of patients attending the dermatology, rheumatology, and gastroenterology clinics from June 2014 to June 2019. The laboratory parameters of patients who have received one of the TNF-alpha inhibitors (adalimumab, etanercept, or infliximab) were collected starting at baseline and up to at least one year from treatment initiation.

Main outcome measures: The time points at which patients developed significantly abnormal laboratory results during treatment with one of the TNF-alpha inhibitors.

Sample size: 250 patients RESULTS: Most patients were treated with adalimumab (38.4%); a similar proportion (38%) with infliximab, whereas only 23.6% were treated with etanercept. The majority of the significant abnormal laboratory results occurred at baseline, 3-6 and 9-12 months. Most abnormalities were among patients using infliximab, followed by etanercept, and then adalimumab. The median number of laboratory abnormalities for dermatology patients was significantly lower than that for gastroenterology patients (P<.001), and for rheumatology patients (P=.002).

Conclusions: Because dermatology patients showed a lower median number of laboratory abnormalities than patients treated by other specialties in our study, we believe that dermatology patients require less frequent laboratory monitoring. Therefore, we recommend laboratory evaluation at baseline, after 3-6 months, 1 year from the beginning of treatment, and annually thereafter for patients using TNF-alpha inhibitor agents. However, more frequent testing might be warranted according to patient comorbidities, concomitant medications, and physician judgment.

Limitations: Single center and retrospective design.

Conflict of interest: None.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

监测tnf - α抑制剂对不同疾病的实验室参数和不良反应的影响:一项回顾性、单中心研究
背景:生物疗法的引入彻底改变了中重度牛皮癣的治疗。多项临床试验已经确立了生物制剂治疗中重度牛皮癣的疗效。然而,对于治疗期间的最佳监测间隔,尚无明确的适应症。目的:收集和分析接受生物治疗患者的实验室评价数据,以便更好地了解在生物药物治疗前和治疗过程中进行实验室检查的必要性,并分析不良事件和其他因素。设计:回顾性队列设置:沙特阿拉伯利雅得的三级保健中心。患者和方法:数据收集自2014年6月至2019年6月在皮肤科、风湿病科和胃肠病学诊所就诊的患者的电子病历。接受tnf - α抑制剂(阿达木单抗、依那西普或英夫利昔单抗)之一的患者的实验室参数从基线开始收集,从治疗开始至少一年。主要结局指标:患者在使用一种tnf - α抑制剂治疗期间出现显著异常实验室结果的时间点。结果:大多数患者接受阿达木单抗治疗(38.4%);英夫利昔单抗治疗的比例相似(38%),而依那西普治疗的比例只有23.6%。大多数显著异常实验室结果发生在基线、3-6月和9-12月。大多数异常发生在使用英夫利昔单抗的患者中,其次是依那西普,然后是阿达木单抗。皮肤科患者的实验室异常中位数明显低于胃肠病学患者(PP= 0.002)。结论:由于在我们的研究中,皮肤科患者的实验室异常中位数低于其他专业的患者,我们认为皮肤科患者需要较少的实验室监测。因此,我们建议使用tnf - α抑制剂的患者在基线、3-6个月后、治疗开始后1年以及此后每年进行实验室评估。然而,根据患者的合并症、伴随用药和医生的判断,可能需要更频繁的检测。局限性:单中心和回顾性设计。利益冲突:无。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Saudi Medicine
Annals of Saudi Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of Saudi Medicine (ASM) is published bimonthly by King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. We publish scientific reports of clinical interest in English. All submissions are subject to peer review by the editorial board and by reviewers in appropriate specialties. The journal will consider for publication manuscripts from any part of the world, but particularly reports that would be of interest to readers in the Middle East or other parts of Asia and Africa. Please go to the Author Resource Center for additional information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信