Prediction of Endotracheal Tube Size in Pediatric Population Using Ultrasonographic Subglottic Diameter and Age-Related Formulas: A Comparative Study.

Anesthesia, Essays and Researches Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-14 DOI:10.4103/aer.aer_11_22
B M Bharathi, Sharmila Somayaji, T Tulasi, N Kaleemullah Sheriff, Jaidev S Bagliker
{"title":"Prediction of Endotracheal Tube Size in Pediatric Population Using Ultrasonographic Subglottic Diameter and Age-Related Formulas: A Comparative Study.","authors":"B M Bharathi,&nbsp;Sharmila Somayaji,&nbsp;T Tulasi,&nbsp;N Kaleemullah Sheriff,&nbsp;Jaidev S Bagliker","doi":"10.4103/aer.aer_11_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Choosing the correct Endotracheal tube (ETT) size is important in paediatric patients because an inappropriately large and small sized tube has its own disadvantages and chances of re-intubation with different size tube is high. The currently available modalities do not reflect the actual tracheal diameter for selection of endotracheal tube. Ultrasonography (USG) guided evaluation of transverse diameter at subglottic region may be helpful to estimate the proper size of ETT. We tested the hypothesis that Ultrasound guided subglottic diameter better predicts optimal ETT size than existing methods.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To predict the appropriate size of ETT in pediatric patients to avoid multiple attempts of intubation and airway edema using simple noninvasive USG-guided methods.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>Design: Prospective study.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>Tertiary care hospital.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Institutional ethical committee clearance no. BMCRI/PS/138/2020-21 was taken. Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation were done in 27 pediatric patients of age 2-15 years using a predetermined-sized ETT, estimated by ultrasonography. ETT size was considered optimal when the cuff leak test was negative. If there was resistance to ETT passage into the trachea, the tube was exchanged with one that was 0.5 mm smaller. If the cuff leak test was positive, then the ETT was exchanged for one with the 0.5-mm larger tube. The comparison was done between the size of ETT calculated by USG-guided subglottic diameter, age, height-related formulas, and clinical methods to look for accuracy of prediction for proper ETT size after cuff leak test.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong>The data collected were entered into Microsoft Excel and analyzed using SPSS version 22. IBM Corp. Released 2013. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. Appropriate parametric and nonparametric tests were applied wherever necessary.</p><p><strong>Categorical data: </strong>Represented in the form of frequencies and proportions. Continuous data: Represented as mean and standard deviation. Paired sample test: Test to identify the mean difference between two quantitative variables. Kappa statistics: To measure the level of agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 27 children of age between 2 and 15 years were selected, out of which 15 were male and 12 were female. The accuracy of predicting appropriate ETT size is greater in ultrasound-guided subglottic diameter when compared to conventional clinical assessment and age- and height-related formula and almost the same accuracy as the clinical method.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultrasound-guided subglottic diameter is an easy, effective, and noninvasive way of predicting accurate ETT size in the pediatric population.</p>","PeriodicalId":7798,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches","volume":"16 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9558668/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_11_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Choosing the correct Endotracheal tube (ETT) size is important in paediatric patients because an inappropriately large and small sized tube has its own disadvantages and chances of re-intubation with different size tube is high. The currently available modalities do not reflect the actual tracheal diameter for selection of endotracheal tube. Ultrasonography (USG) guided evaluation of transverse diameter at subglottic region may be helpful to estimate the proper size of ETT. We tested the hypothesis that Ultrasound guided subglottic diameter better predicts optimal ETT size than existing methods.

Aims: To predict the appropriate size of ETT in pediatric patients to avoid multiple attempts of intubation and airway edema using simple noninvasive USG-guided methods.

Settings and design: Design: Prospective study.

Settings: Tertiary care hospital.

Materials and methods: Institutional ethical committee clearance no. BMCRI/PS/138/2020-21 was taken. Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation were done in 27 pediatric patients of age 2-15 years using a predetermined-sized ETT, estimated by ultrasonography. ETT size was considered optimal when the cuff leak test was negative. If there was resistance to ETT passage into the trachea, the tube was exchanged with one that was 0.5 mm smaller. If the cuff leak test was positive, then the ETT was exchanged for one with the 0.5-mm larger tube. The comparison was done between the size of ETT calculated by USG-guided subglottic diameter, age, height-related formulas, and clinical methods to look for accuracy of prediction for proper ETT size after cuff leak test.

Statistical analysis: The data collected were entered into Microsoft Excel and analyzed using SPSS version 22. IBM Corp. Released 2013. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. Appropriate parametric and nonparametric tests were applied wherever necessary.

Categorical data: Represented in the form of frequencies and proportions. Continuous data: Represented as mean and standard deviation. Paired sample test: Test to identify the mean difference between two quantitative variables. Kappa statistics: To measure the level of agreement.

Results: A total of 27 children of age between 2 and 15 years were selected, out of which 15 were male and 12 were female. The accuracy of predicting appropriate ETT size is greater in ultrasound-guided subglottic diameter when compared to conventional clinical assessment and age- and height-related formula and almost the same accuracy as the clinical method.

Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided subglottic diameter is an easy, effective, and noninvasive way of predicting accurate ETT size in the pediatric population.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

超声声门下直径与年龄相关公式预测小儿气管导管大小的比较研究。
背景:选择正确的气管插管(ETT)尺寸对儿科患者很重要,因为大小不合适的气管插管有其自身的缺点,并且不同尺寸的气管插管再次插管的几率很高。目前可用的模式不能反映实际的气管直径选择气管内管。超声引导下评估声门下区横径有助于估计ETT的合适大小。我们验证了超声引导声门下直径比现有方法更能预测最佳ETT大小的假设。目的:通过简单的无创usg引导方法预测儿科患者ETT的合适大小,以避免多次插管尝试和气道水肿。设定与设计:设计:前瞻性研究。环境:三级保健医院。材料和方法:机构伦理委员会批准号:通过BMCRI/PS/138/2020-21。我们对27例2-15岁的儿童患者进行了喉镜检查和气管插管,使用超声检查估计的预先确定大小的气管插管。当袖带泄漏试验为阴性时,ETT大小被认为是最佳的。如果ETT进入气管有阻力,则更换小0.5 mm的导管。如果袖带泄漏试验呈阳性,则将ETT更换为0.5 mm大管。比较usg引导下声门下直径、年龄、身高相关公式和临床方法计算的ETT大小,以寻找袖带泄漏试验后预测合适ETT大小的准确性。统计分析:将收集到的数据输入到Microsoft Excel中,使用SPSS version 22进行分析。IBM公司2013年发布。IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0。在必要的地方应用了适当的参数和非参数测试。分类数据:以频率和比例的形式表示。连续数据:用均值和标准差表示。配对样本检验:确定两个定量变量之间的平均差异的检验。Kappa统计:衡量一致性的水平。结果:共选取2 ~ 15岁儿童27例,其中男15例,女12例。超声引导下声门下直径预测适当ETT大小的准确性高于常规临床评估和与年龄和身高相关的公式,与临床方法几乎相同。结论:超声引导下声门下直径是一种简单、有效、无创的预测儿童ETT大小的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信