Destructibility and axiomatizability of Kaufmann models

IF 0.3 4区 数学 Q1 Arts and Humanities
Corey Bacal Switzer
{"title":"Destructibility and axiomatizability of Kaufmann models","authors":"Corey Bacal Switzer","doi":"10.1007/s00153-022-00826-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A Kaufmann model is an <span>\\(\\omega _1\\)</span>-like, recursively saturated, rather classless model of <span>\\({{\\mathsf {P}}}{{\\mathsf {A}}}\\)</span> (or <span>\\({{\\mathsf {Z}}}{{\\mathsf {F}}} \\)</span>). Such models were constructed by Kaufmann under the combinatorial principle <span>\\(\\diamondsuit _{\\omega _1}\\)</span> and Shelah showed they exist in <span>\\(\\mathsf {ZFC}\\)</span> by an absoluteness argument. Kaufmann models are an important witness to the incompactness of <span>\\(\\omega _1\\)</span> similar to Aronszajn trees. In this paper we look at some set theoretic issues related to this motivated by the seemingly naïve question of whether such a model can be “killed” by forcing without collapsing <span>\\(\\omega _1\\)</span>. We show that the answer to this question is independent of <span>\\(\\mathsf {ZFC}\\)</span> and closely related to similar questions about Aronszajn trees. As an application of these methods we also show that it is independent of <span>\\(\\mathsf {ZFC}\\)</span> whether or not Kaufmann models can be axiomatized in the logic <span>\\(L_{\\omega _1, \\omega } (Q)\\)</span> where <i>Q</i> is the quantifier “there exists uncountably many”.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48853,"journal":{"name":"Archive for Mathematical Logic","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00153-022-00826-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archive for Mathematical Logic","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00153-022-00826-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A Kaufmann model is an \(\omega _1\)-like, recursively saturated, rather classless model of \({{\mathsf {P}}}{{\mathsf {A}}}\) (or \({{\mathsf {Z}}}{{\mathsf {F}}} \)). Such models were constructed by Kaufmann under the combinatorial principle \(\diamondsuit _{\omega _1}\) and Shelah showed they exist in \(\mathsf {ZFC}\) by an absoluteness argument. Kaufmann models are an important witness to the incompactness of \(\omega _1\) similar to Aronszajn trees. In this paper we look at some set theoretic issues related to this motivated by the seemingly naïve question of whether such a model can be “killed” by forcing without collapsing \(\omega _1\). We show that the answer to this question is independent of \(\mathsf {ZFC}\) and closely related to similar questions about Aronszajn trees. As an application of these methods we also show that it is independent of \(\mathsf {ZFC}\) whether or not Kaufmann models can be axiomatized in the logic \(L_{\omega _1, \omega } (Q)\) where Q is the quantifier “there exists uncountably many”.

考夫曼模型的可破坏性和公理化性
Kaufmann模型是一个类似\(\omega _1\)的,递归饱和的,相对无类的\({{\mathsf {P}}}{{\mathsf {A}}}\)(或\({{\mathsf {Z}}}{{\mathsf {F}}} \))模型。这些模型由Kaufmann根据组合原理\(\diamondsuit _{\omega _1}\)构建,Shelah通过绝对性论证在\(\mathsf {ZFC}\)中证明了它们的存在。Kaufmann模型是类似于Aronszajn树的\(\omega _1\)不紧性的重要证明。在本文中,我们着眼于与此相关的一些集合论问题,这些问题似乎是由naïve问题引起的,即这样的模型是否可以通过强制而不崩溃\(\omega _1\)而被“杀死”。我们证明了这个问题的答案是独立于\(\mathsf {ZFC}\)的,并且与关于Aronszajn树的类似问题密切相关。作为这些方法的一个应用,我们还证明了在逻辑\(L_{\omega _1, \omega } (Q)\)中考夫曼模型是否可以公理化与\(\mathsf {ZFC}\)无关,其中Q是量词“存在不可数的许多”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archive for Mathematical Logic
Archive for Mathematical Logic MATHEMATICS-LOGIC
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes research papers and occasionally surveys or expositions on mathematical logic. Contributions are also welcomed from other related areas, such as theoretical computer science or philosophy, as long as the methods of mathematical logic play a significant role. The journal therefore addresses logicians and mathematicians, computer scientists, and philosophers who are interested in the applications of mathematical logic in their own field, as well as its interactions with other areas of research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信