Buffered articaine infiltration for primary maxillary molar extractions: a randomized controlled study.

Parag Dhake, Devendra Nagpal, Purva Chaudhari, Gagandeep Lamba, Kavita Hotwani, Prabhat Singh
{"title":"Buffered articaine infiltration for primary maxillary molar extractions: a randomized controlled study.","authors":"Parag Dhake,&nbsp;Devendra Nagpal,&nbsp;Purva Chaudhari,&nbsp;Gagandeep Lamba,&nbsp;Kavita Hotwani,&nbsp;Prabhat Singh","doi":"10.17245/jdapm.2022.22.5.387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dental pain management is an important aspect of patient management in pediatric dentistry. Articaine is considered the most successful anesthetic agent for infiltration anesthesia. Buffered articaine has been observed to have faster onset and longer duration of action with less pain on injection. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare pain on injection, onset of action, and pain during extraction using buffered (using Sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO<sub>3</sub>)) and non-buffered 4% articaine (with 1:100000 adrenaline) infiltrations for primary maxillary molar extractions in 4-10-year-old children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy children who required extraction of maxillary primary molars were enrolled in this triple-blind randomized study. Children undergoing extraction were randomly divided into two groups, with 35 in each group. The study group was the buffered articaine group; the control group was the non-buffered articaine group. Buccal and palatal infiltrations were administered with either buffered or non-buffered articaine. Subjective evaluation was done for pain on injection, pain during extraction using Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (WBFPR) and onset of anesthesia in seconds. Pain on injection, pain during extraction were objectively evaluated using Sound Eye Motor (SEM) scale and onset of anesthesia was also evaluated objectively by pricking with sharp dental probe.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The outcome was, significantly less pain on injection and significantly faster onset of anesthesia with significantly less pain during extraction for both subjective and objective evaluations in the buffered articaine group. Subgroup analysis was also performed and it showed variable results, with only significant difference for WBFPR scores in age subgroup 4-7 years for palatal infiltration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Less pain on injection, faster onset of anesthesia, and less pain during extraction were observed when buffered articaine was used for maxillary primary molar extraction.</p>","PeriodicalId":15634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"387-394"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e2/8b/jdapm-22-387.PMC9536944.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2022.22.5.387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Dental pain management is an important aspect of patient management in pediatric dentistry. Articaine is considered the most successful anesthetic agent for infiltration anesthesia. Buffered articaine has been observed to have faster onset and longer duration of action with less pain on injection. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare pain on injection, onset of action, and pain during extraction using buffered (using Sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3)) and non-buffered 4% articaine (with 1:100000 adrenaline) infiltrations for primary maxillary molar extractions in 4-10-year-old children.

Methods: Seventy children who required extraction of maxillary primary molars were enrolled in this triple-blind randomized study. Children undergoing extraction were randomly divided into two groups, with 35 in each group. The study group was the buffered articaine group; the control group was the non-buffered articaine group. Buccal and palatal infiltrations were administered with either buffered or non-buffered articaine. Subjective evaluation was done for pain on injection, pain during extraction using Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (WBFPR) and onset of anesthesia in seconds. Pain on injection, pain during extraction were objectively evaluated using Sound Eye Motor (SEM) scale and onset of anesthesia was also evaluated objectively by pricking with sharp dental probe.

Results: The outcome was, significantly less pain on injection and significantly faster onset of anesthesia with significantly less pain during extraction for both subjective and objective evaluations in the buffered articaine group. Subgroup analysis was also performed and it showed variable results, with only significant difference for WBFPR scores in age subgroup 4-7 years for palatal infiltration.

Conclusion: Less pain on injection, faster onset of anesthesia, and less pain during extraction were observed when buffered articaine was used for maxillary primary molar extraction.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

缓冲关节碱浸润用于上颌磨牙拔除:一项随机对照研究。
背景:牙痛管理是儿童牙科患者管理的一个重要方面。阿替卡因被认为是最成功的浸润麻醉药物。经观察,缓冲阿卡因起效更快,作用持续时间更长,注射时疼痛更少。本研究的目的是评估和比较4-10岁儿童上颌磨牙拔牙时使用缓冲(使用碳酸氢钠(NaHCO3))和非缓冲4%阿替卡因(1:10万肾上腺素)浸润的注射疼痛、起效疼痛和拔牙时的疼痛。方法:70名需要拔除上颌初生磨牙的儿童参加了这项三盲随机研究。拔牙儿童随机分为两组,每组35人。实验组为缓冲articaine组;对照组为无缓冲阿替卡因组。颊部和腭部浸润用缓冲或非缓冲的articaine进行治疗。采用Wong-Baker面部疼痛评定量表(WBFPR)对注射时疼痛、拔牙时疼痛和麻醉开始时间进行主观评价。采用超声眼动量表(SEM)客观评价注射时疼痛、拔牙时疼痛,用尖牙探针刺痛客观评价麻醉开始时间。结果:在主观和客观评价中,缓冲阿卡因组注射时疼痛明显减轻,麻醉起效明显加快,拔牙时疼痛明显减轻。亚组分析也显示出不同的结果,只有4-7岁年龄组的腭浸润WBFPR评分有显著差异。结论:缓冲阿替卡因用于上颌第一磨牙拔牙,注射时疼痛小,麻醉起效快,拔牙时疼痛小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信