Asset and consumption gradient of health estimates in India: Implications for survey and public health research.

SSM - Population Health Pub Date : 2022-10-04 eCollection Date: 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101258
Sanjay K Mohanty, S K Singh, Santosh Kumar Sharma, Kajori Banerji, Rajib Acharya
{"title":"Asset and consumption gradient of health estimates in India: Implications for survey and public health research.","authors":"Sanjay K Mohanty,&nbsp;S K Singh,&nbsp;Santosh Kumar Sharma,&nbsp;Kajori Banerji,&nbsp;Rajib Acharya","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The wealth index based on household assets and amenities is been increasingly used to explain economic variations of health outcomes in the developing countries. While the variables used to compute the wealth index are easy to collect and time- and cost-effective, the wealth index tends to have an urban bias, uses arbitrary weighting, does not provide per capita measures and is a poor measure of inequality. We used micro data from two of the large-scale population-based surveys, the Longitudinal Ageing Study in India, 2017-18 and the India Human Development Survey, 2011-12 that covered over 42,000 households each and collected data on household consumption, assets and amenities in India. We examined the variations and inequality in health estimates by consumption per capita and asset-based measures in India. Descriptive statistics, logistic regression model, concentration index, and concentration curve were used in the analyses. We found a weak association between monthly per capita consumption expenditure (MPCE) and wealth index in both the surveys. Some of the health conditions such as hypertension, cataract, refractive error, and diabetes tended to be underestimated in the bottom 40% of the population when economic well-being was measured using the wealth index compared to consumption. Socio-economic inequality in health outcome, inpatient and outpatient health services were underestimated when measured using the wealth index than when measured using MPCE. We conclude that economic gradients of health by consumption and wealth index are inconsistent and that per capita consumption predicts health estimates better than the wealth index. It is recommended that public health research using population-based surveys that provide data on consumption and wealth index use per capita consumption to explain economic variations in health and health care utilization. We also suggest that the future rounds of the health surveys of National Sample Survey and the National Family and Health Surveys include an abridged version of the consumption schedule to predict better economic variations in health and health care utilization in India.</p>","PeriodicalId":506314,"journal":{"name":"SSM - Population Health","volume":" ","pages":"101258"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fd/09/main.PMC9550646.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM - Population Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The wealth index based on household assets and amenities is been increasingly used to explain economic variations of health outcomes in the developing countries. While the variables used to compute the wealth index are easy to collect and time- and cost-effective, the wealth index tends to have an urban bias, uses arbitrary weighting, does not provide per capita measures and is a poor measure of inequality. We used micro data from two of the large-scale population-based surveys, the Longitudinal Ageing Study in India, 2017-18 and the India Human Development Survey, 2011-12 that covered over 42,000 households each and collected data on household consumption, assets and amenities in India. We examined the variations and inequality in health estimates by consumption per capita and asset-based measures in India. Descriptive statistics, logistic regression model, concentration index, and concentration curve were used in the analyses. We found a weak association between monthly per capita consumption expenditure (MPCE) and wealth index in both the surveys. Some of the health conditions such as hypertension, cataract, refractive error, and diabetes tended to be underestimated in the bottom 40% of the population when economic well-being was measured using the wealth index compared to consumption. Socio-economic inequality in health outcome, inpatient and outpatient health services were underestimated when measured using the wealth index than when measured using MPCE. We conclude that economic gradients of health by consumption and wealth index are inconsistent and that per capita consumption predicts health estimates better than the wealth index. It is recommended that public health research using population-based surveys that provide data on consumption and wealth index use per capita consumption to explain economic variations in health and health care utilization. We also suggest that the future rounds of the health surveys of National Sample Survey and the National Family and Health Surveys include an abridged version of the consumption schedule to predict better economic variations in health and health care utilization in India.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

印度健康估计的资产和消费梯度:对调查和公共卫生研究的影响。
在发展中国家,基于家庭资产和便利设施的财富指数越来越多地被用来解释健康结果的经济差异。虽然用于计算财富指数的变量很容易收集,而且时间和成本效益都很好,但财富指数往往有城市偏见,使用任意加权,不提供人均指标,也是衡量不平等程度的糟糕指标。我们使用了两项大规模人口调查的微观数据,分别是2017-18年印度纵向老龄化研究和2011-12年印度人类发展调查,这两项调查分别覆盖了4.2万多户家庭,并收集了印度家庭消费、资产和便利设施的数据。我们检查了印度按人均消费和基于资产的措施进行健康估计的差异和不平等。采用描述性统计、logistic回归模型、浓度指数和浓度曲线进行分析。我们发现,在这两项调查中,月人均消费支出(MPCE)与财富指数之间存在弱关联。当使用财富指数与消费相比较来衡量经济福祉时,一些健康状况,如高血压、白内障、屈光不正和糖尿病,往往被低估了底层40%的人口。与使用MPCE测量相比,使用财富指数测量健康结果、住院和门诊卫生服务方面的社会经济不平等被低估。我们得出结论,消费和财富指数对健康的经济梯度是不一致的,人均消费比财富指数更能预测健康估计。建议使用基于人口的调查进行公共卫生研究,提供消费和财富指数使用人均消费的数据,以解释健康和卫生保健利用方面的经济差异。我们还建议,今后几轮全国抽样调查和全国家庭与健康调查的健康调查应包括一份消费表的删节版,以更好地预测印度健康和医疗保健利用方面的经济差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信