Utility of the 16-cm Axial Volume Scan Technique for Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring on Non-Enhanced Chest CT: A Prospective Pilot Study.

Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe chi Pub Date : 2021-11-01 Epub Date: 2021-08-27 DOI:10.3348/jksr.2020.0156
So Jung Ki, Chul Hwan Park, Kyunghwa Han, Jae Min Shin, Ji Young Kim, Tae Hoon Kim
{"title":"Utility of the 16-cm Axial Volume Scan Technique for Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring on Non-Enhanced Chest CT: A Prospective Pilot Study.","authors":"So Jung Ki,&nbsp;Chul Hwan Park,&nbsp;Kyunghwa Han,&nbsp;Jae Min Shin,&nbsp;Ji Young Kim,&nbsp;Tae Hoon Kim","doi":"10.3348/jksr.2020.0156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the utility of the 16-cm axial volume scan technique for calculating the coronary artery calcium score (CACS) using non-enhanced chest CT.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study prospectively enrolled 20 participants who underwent both, non-enhanced chest CT (16-cm-coverage axial volume scan technique) and calcium-score CT, with the same parameters, differing only in slice thickness (in non-enhanced chest CT = 0.625, 1.25, 2.5 mm; in calcium score CT = 2.5 mm). The CACS was calculated using the conventional Agatston method. The difference between the CACS obtained from the two CT scans was compared, and the degree of agreement for the clinical significance of the CACS was confirmed through sectional analysis. Each calcified lesion was classified by location and size, and a one-to-one comparison of non-contrast-enhanced chest CT and calcium score CT was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The correlation coefficients of the CACS obtained from the two CT scans for slice thickness of 2.5, 1.25, and 0.625 mm were 0.9850, 0.9688, and 0.9834, respectively. The mean differences between the CACS were -21.4% at 0.625 mm, -39.4% at 1.25 mm, and -76.2% at 2.5 mm slice thicknesses. Sectional analysis revealed that 16 (80%), 16 (80%), and 13 (65%) patients showed agreement for the degree of coronary artery disease at each slice interval, respectively. Inter-reader agreement was high for each slice interval. The 0.625 mm CT showed the highest sensitivity for detecting calcified lesions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The values in the non-contrast-enhanced chest CT, using the 16-cm axial volume scan technique, were similar to those obtained using the CACS in the calcium score CT, at 0.625 mm slice thickness without electrocardiogram gating. This can ultimately help predict cardiovascular risk without additional radiation exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":74904,"journal":{"name":"Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe chi","volume":"82 6","pages":"1493-1504"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/be/bf/jksr-82-1493.PMC9431984.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe chi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2020.0156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the utility of the 16-cm axial volume scan technique for calculating the coronary artery calcium score (CACS) using non-enhanced chest CT.

Materials and methods: This study prospectively enrolled 20 participants who underwent both, non-enhanced chest CT (16-cm-coverage axial volume scan technique) and calcium-score CT, with the same parameters, differing only in slice thickness (in non-enhanced chest CT = 0.625, 1.25, 2.5 mm; in calcium score CT = 2.5 mm). The CACS was calculated using the conventional Agatston method. The difference between the CACS obtained from the two CT scans was compared, and the degree of agreement for the clinical significance of the CACS was confirmed through sectional analysis. Each calcified lesion was classified by location and size, and a one-to-one comparison of non-contrast-enhanced chest CT and calcium score CT was performed.

Results: The correlation coefficients of the CACS obtained from the two CT scans for slice thickness of 2.5, 1.25, and 0.625 mm were 0.9850, 0.9688, and 0.9834, respectively. The mean differences between the CACS were -21.4% at 0.625 mm, -39.4% at 1.25 mm, and -76.2% at 2.5 mm slice thicknesses. Sectional analysis revealed that 16 (80%), 16 (80%), and 13 (65%) patients showed agreement for the degree of coronary artery disease at each slice interval, respectively. Inter-reader agreement was high for each slice interval. The 0.625 mm CT showed the highest sensitivity for detecting calcified lesions.

Conclusion: The values in the non-contrast-enhanced chest CT, using the 16-cm axial volume scan technique, were similar to those obtained using the CACS in the calcium score CT, at 0.625 mm slice thickness without electrocardiogram gating. This can ultimately help predict cardiovascular risk without additional radiation exposure.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

16厘米轴向容积扫描技术在非增强胸部CT冠状动脉钙化评分中的应用:一项前瞻性先导研究。
目的:本研究旨在评估16厘米轴向容积扫描技术在非增强胸部CT计算冠状动脉钙评分(CACS)中的应用价值。材料和方法:本研究前瞻性地招募了20名参与者,他们接受了非增强胸部CT(16厘米覆盖轴向容积扫描技术)和钙评分CT,参数相同,仅层厚不同(非增强胸部CT = 0.625, 1.25, 2.5 mm;CT = 2.5 mm)。CACS采用传统的Agatston法计算。比较两次CT扫描所得CACS的差异,通过断面分析确认CACS的临床意义的一致程度。每个钙化病灶按位置和大小进行分类,并对胸部非增强CT与钙化评分CT进行一对一比较。结果:2.5、1.25、0.625 mm层厚2次CT扫描CACS相关系数分别为0.9850、0.9688、0.9834。在0.625 mm时,CACS的平均差异为-21.4%,1.25 mm时为-39.4%,2.5 mm时为-76.2%。断面分析显示,分别有16例(80%)、16例(80%)和13例(65%)患者在每个切片间隔的冠状动脉病变程度一致。每个切片间隔的读间一致性很高。0.625 mm CT对钙化病变的敏感度最高。结论:在无心电图门控的情况下,采用16 cm轴向容积扫描技术的非增强胸部CT在0.625 mm层厚处与CACS在钙评分CT上的数值相似。这最终可以帮助预测心血管风险,而无需额外的辐射暴露。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信