Evaluating the effect of measles and rubella mass vaccination campaigns on seroprevalence in India: a before-and-after cross-sectional household serosurvey in four districts, 2018-2020.

Manoj V Murhekar, Nivedita Gupta, Alvira Z Hasan, Muthusamy Santhosh Kumar, V Saravana Kumar, Christine Prosperi, Gajanan N Sapkal, Jeromie Wesley Vivian Thangaraj, Ojas Kaduskar, Vaishali Bhatt, Gururaj Rao Deshpande, Ullas Padinjaremattathil Thankappan, Avi Kumar Bansal, Sanjay L Chauhan, Gangandeep Singh Grover, Arun Kumar Jain, Ragini N Kulkarni, Santanu Kumar Sharma, Itta K Chaaithanya, Sanchit Kharwal, Sunil K Mishra, Neha R Salvi, Sandeep Sharma, Nilanju P Sarmah, R Sabarinathan, Augustine Duraiswamy, D Sudha Rani, K Kanagasabai, Abhishek Lachyan, Poonam Gawali, Mitali Kapoor, Arpit Kumar Shrivastava, Saurabh Kumar Chonker, Bipin Tilekar, Babasaheb V Tandale, Mohammad Ahmad, Lucky Sangal, Amy Winter, Sanjay M Mehendale, William J Moss, Kyla Hayford
{"title":"Evaluating the effect of measles and rubella mass vaccination campaigns on seroprevalence in India: a before-and-after cross-sectional household serosurvey in four districts, 2018-2020.","authors":"Manoj V Murhekar, Nivedita Gupta, Alvira Z Hasan, Muthusamy Santhosh Kumar, V Saravana Kumar, Christine Prosperi, Gajanan N Sapkal, Jeromie Wesley Vivian Thangaraj, Ojas Kaduskar, Vaishali Bhatt, Gururaj Rao Deshpande, Ullas Padinjaremattathil Thankappan, Avi Kumar Bansal, Sanjay L Chauhan, Gangandeep Singh Grover, Arun Kumar Jain, Ragini N Kulkarni, Santanu Kumar Sharma, Itta K Chaaithanya, Sanchit Kharwal, Sunil K Mishra, Neha R Salvi, Sandeep Sharma, Nilanju P Sarmah, R Sabarinathan, Augustine Duraiswamy, D Sudha Rani, K Kanagasabai, Abhishek Lachyan, Poonam Gawali, Mitali Kapoor, Arpit Kumar Shrivastava, Saurabh Kumar Chonker, Bipin Tilekar, Babasaheb V Tandale, Mohammad Ahmad, Lucky Sangal, Amy Winter, Sanjay M Mehendale, William J Moss, Kyla Hayford","doi":"10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00379-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>India did phased measles-rubella supplementary immunisation activities (MR-SIAs; ie, mass-immunisation campaigns) targeting children aged 9 months to less than 15 years. We estimated measles-rubella seroprevalence before and after the MR-SIAs to quantify the effect on population immunity and identify remaining immunity gaps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between March 9, 2018 and March 19, 2020 we did community-based, cross-sectional serosurveys in four districts in India before and after MR-SIAs. 30 villages or wards were selected within each district, and one census enumeration block from each was selected as the survey cluster. Households were enumerated and 13 children in the younger age group (9 months to <5 years) and 13 children in the older ager group (5 to <15 years) were randomly selected by use of computer-generated random numbers. Serum samples were tested for IgG antibodies to measles and rubella viruses by enzyme immunoassay.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Specimens were collected from 2570 children before the MR-SIA and from 2619 children afterwards. The weighted MR-SIA coverage ranged from 73·7% to 90·5% in younger children and from 73·6% to 93·6% in older children. Before the MR-SIA, district-level measles seroprevalence was between 80·7% and 88·5% among younger children in all districts, and between 63·4% and 84·5% among older children. After the MR-SIA, measles seroprevalence among younger children increased to more than 90% (range 91·5 to 96·0) in all districts except Kanpur Nagar, in which it remained unchanged 80·4%. Among older children, measles seroprevalence increased to more than 90·0% (range 93·7% to 96·5%) in all districts except Hoshiarpur (88·7%). A significant increase in rubella seroprevalence was observed in all districts in both age groups, with the largest effect in Dibrugarh, where rubella seroprevalence increased from 10·6% to 96·5% among younger children.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Measles-rubella seroprevalence increased substantially after the MR-SIAs but the serosurvey also identified remaining gaps in population immunity.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Indian Council of Medical Research.</p>","PeriodicalId":153380,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet. Global health","volume":" ","pages":"e1655-e1664"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9579355/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet. Global health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00379-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: India did phased measles-rubella supplementary immunisation activities (MR-SIAs; ie, mass-immunisation campaigns) targeting children aged 9 months to less than 15 years. We estimated measles-rubella seroprevalence before and after the MR-SIAs to quantify the effect on population immunity and identify remaining immunity gaps.

Methods: Between March 9, 2018 and March 19, 2020 we did community-based, cross-sectional serosurveys in four districts in India before and after MR-SIAs. 30 villages or wards were selected within each district, and one census enumeration block from each was selected as the survey cluster. Households were enumerated and 13 children in the younger age group (9 months to <5 years) and 13 children in the older ager group (5 to <15 years) were randomly selected by use of computer-generated random numbers. Serum samples were tested for IgG antibodies to measles and rubella viruses by enzyme immunoassay.

Findings: Specimens were collected from 2570 children before the MR-SIA and from 2619 children afterwards. The weighted MR-SIA coverage ranged from 73·7% to 90·5% in younger children and from 73·6% to 93·6% in older children. Before the MR-SIA, district-level measles seroprevalence was between 80·7% and 88·5% among younger children in all districts, and between 63·4% and 84·5% among older children. After the MR-SIA, measles seroprevalence among younger children increased to more than 90% (range 91·5 to 96·0) in all districts except Kanpur Nagar, in which it remained unchanged 80·4%. Among older children, measles seroprevalence increased to more than 90·0% (range 93·7% to 96·5%) in all districts except Hoshiarpur (88·7%). A significant increase in rubella seroprevalence was observed in all districts in both age groups, with the largest effect in Dibrugarh, where rubella seroprevalence increased from 10·6% to 96·5% among younger children.

Interpretation: Measles-rubella seroprevalence increased substantially after the MR-SIAs but the serosurvey also identified remaining gaps in population immunity.

Funding: The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Indian Council of Medical Research.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

评估印度麻疹和风疹大规模疫苗接种运动对血清阳性率的影响:2018-2020年4个地区前后横断面家庭血清调查
背景:印度开展了分阶段麻疹-风疹补充免疫活动(MR-SIAs;即针对9个月至15岁以下儿童的大规模免疫运动。我们在MR-SIAs前后估计了麻疹-风疹血清患病率,以量化对人群免疫的影响并确定剩余的免疫缺口。方法:2018年3月9日至2020年3月19日期间,我们在印度四个地区进行了MR-SIAs前后的社区横断面血清调查。每区选取30个村(区),每区选取1个普查点位作为调查集群。经点算的家庭和13名年龄较小的儿童(9个月至调查结果):在MR-SIA之前收集了2570名儿童的标本,在MR-SIA之后收集了2619名儿童的标本。加权MR-SIA覆盖率在年幼儿童中为73.7%至99.5%,在较大儿童中为73.6%至93.6%。在MR-SIA之前,各区低龄儿童的区级麻疹血清阳性率在86.7%至88.5%之间,大龄儿童的区级麻疹血清阳性率在63.4%至84.5%之间。在MR-SIA之后,除坎普尔那格尔以外的所有地区,幼儿的麻疹血清患病率增加到90%以上(范围91.5至96.0),在坎普尔那格尔,这一比例保持在84%不变。在年龄较大的儿童中,除Hoshiarpur(88.7%)外,所有地区的麻疹血清阳性率均上升至90.3%以上(93.7%至96.5%)。在所有地区,两个年龄组的风疹血清阳性率均显著上升,其中Dibrugarh的影响最大,那里年幼儿童的风疹血清阳性率从10.6%上升到96.5%。解释:麻疹-风疹血清流行率在MR-SIAs后大幅增加,但血清调查也发现了人群免疫方面仍存在差距。资助:比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会和印度医学研究理事会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信