Utility of medicines information leaflets in hypertensive care in a setting with low health literacy: A cross-sectional study.

Medicine access @ point of care Pub Date : 2020-05-13 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2399202620910031
Mtungwazi Kudzinesta, Mwangana Mubita, Francis Kalemeera, Brian Godman, Ester Hango, Dan Kibuule
{"title":"Utility of medicines information leaflets in hypertensive care in a setting with low health literacy: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Mtungwazi Kudzinesta,&nbsp;Mwangana Mubita,&nbsp;Francis Kalemeera,&nbsp;Brian Godman,&nbsp;Ester Hango,&nbsp;Dan Kibuule","doi":"10.1177/2399202620910031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Higher levels of health literacy improve utilization of health information, medication adherence and outcomes. Few studies evaluate the utility of medicines information in hypertensive care in settings with low health literacy.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine the level of health literacy and utility of medicines information leaflets (MILs) among hypertensive patients in public health care in Namibia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A hospital-based survey among hypertensive patients receiving care at a referral hospital in Namibia from the 8 June 2018 to 29 June 2018. Patient's health literacy and utility of MIL were assessed using three literacy tools and a survey questionnaire. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and qualitative thematic content analysis for factors associate with the utility of the MIL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 139 patients, 63% were female and the mean age was 45.7 (range: 19.0-84.0) years. Over 85.6% had of low literacy skills (Rapid Estimate of Literacy in Medicine (REALM) score <44, that is, unable to read simple health materials), 38.8% had positive Single Item Literacy Screener (SILS) scores (⩾2, require help to read medicines information) and 66.9% had inadequate skills for comprehension, appraisal and decision-making with regard to health information (Health Literacy Skills Instrument-Short Form (HLSI-SF) score <70%). The level of access to and utility of MIL were low, 32.4% and 34.6%, respectively. The main factors associated with poor utility of the MIL were low patient health literacy, lack of guidelines on the use of MIL and MIL written in non-native languages.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Low rates of health literacy and utility of MIL were observed among hypertensive patients in Namibia. The integration of health literacy programmes, and MIL guidelines are needed to promote utility of medicine information and improve medication adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":74158,"journal":{"name":"Medicine access @ point of care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2399202620910031","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine access @ point of care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2399202620910031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Higher levels of health literacy improve utilization of health information, medication adherence and outcomes. Few studies evaluate the utility of medicines information in hypertensive care in settings with low health literacy.

Aim: To determine the level of health literacy and utility of medicines information leaflets (MILs) among hypertensive patients in public health care in Namibia.

Methods: A hospital-based survey among hypertensive patients receiving care at a referral hospital in Namibia from the 8 June 2018 to 29 June 2018. Patient's health literacy and utility of MIL were assessed using three literacy tools and a survey questionnaire. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and qualitative thematic content analysis for factors associate with the utility of the MIL.

Results: Of the 139 patients, 63% were female and the mean age was 45.7 (range: 19.0-84.0) years. Over 85.6% had of low literacy skills (Rapid Estimate of Literacy in Medicine (REALM) score <44, that is, unable to read simple health materials), 38.8% had positive Single Item Literacy Screener (SILS) scores (⩾2, require help to read medicines information) and 66.9% had inadequate skills for comprehension, appraisal and decision-making with regard to health information (Health Literacy Skills Instrument-Short Form (HLSI-SF) score <70%). The level of access to and utility of MIL were low, 32.4% and 34.6%, respectively. The main factors associated with poor utility of the MIL were low patient health literacy, lack of guidelines on the use of MIL and MIL written in non-native languages.

Conclusion: Low rates of health literacy and utility of MIL were observed among hypertensive patients in Namibia. The integration of health literacy programmes, and MIL guidelines are needed to promote utility of medicine information and improve medication adherence.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

药物信息单张在低健康素养人群高血压护理中的应用:一项横断面研究
导言:较高水平的卫生知识可以改善卫生信息的利用、药物依从性和结果。很少有研究评估药物信息在低健康素养环境下高血压护理中的效用。目的:了解纳米比亚公共卫生保健机构高血压患者的健康素养水平和药物信息单张的使用情况。方法:对2018年6月8日至2018年6月29日在纳米比亚一家转诊医院接受治疗的高血压患者进行医院调查。采用三种识字工具和调查问卷评估患者的健康素养和MIL的效用。结果:139例患者中,63%为女性,平均年龄45.7岁(19.0 ~ 84.0岁)。结论:纳米比亚高血压患者的健康素养和医学素养的利用率较低。需要将卫生扫盲方案与医疗卫生准则结合起来,以促进医学信息的利用并改善药物依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信