Interpreting Breast Cancer Mortality Trends Related to Introduction of Mammography Screening: A Simulation Study.

MDM policy & practice Pub Date : 2022-10-08 eCollection Date: 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1177/23814683221131321
Torunn Heggland, Lars Johan Vatten, Signe Opdahl, Harald Weedon-Fekjær
{"title":"Interpreting Breast Cancer Mortality Trends Related to Introduction of Mammography Screening: A Simulation Study.","authors":"Torunn Heggland,&nbsp;Lars Johan Vatten,&nbsp;Signe Opdahl,&nbsp;Harald Weedon-Fekjær","doi":"10.1177/23814683221131321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background.</b> Several studies have evaluated the effect of mammography screening on breast cancer mortality based on overall breast cancer mortality trends, with varied conclusions. The statistical power of such trend analyses is, however, not carefully studied. <b>Methods.</b> We estimated how the effect of screening on overall breast cancer mortality is likely to unfold. Because a screening effect is based on earlier treatment, screening can affect only new incident cases after screening introduction. To evaluate the likelihood of detecting screening effects on overall breast cancer mortality time trends, we calculated the statistical power of joinpoint regression analysis on breast cancer mortality trends around screening introduction using simulations. <b>Results.</b> We found that a very gradual increase in population-level screening effect is expected due to prescreening incident cases. Assuming 25% effectiveness of a biennial screening program in reducing breast cancer mortality among women 50 to 69 y of age, the expected reduction in overall breast cancer mortality was 3% after 2 y and reached a long-term effect of 18% after 20 y. In common settings, the statistical power to detect any screening effects using joinpoint regression analysis is very low (<50%), even in an artificial setting of constant risk of baseline breast cancer mortality over time. <b>Conclusions.</b> Population effects of screening on breast cancer mortality emerge very gradually and are expected to be considerably lower than the effects reported in trials excluding women diagnosed before screening. Studies of overall breast cancer mortality time trends have too low statistical power to reliably detect screening effects in most populations. <b>Implications.</b> Researchers and policy makers evaluating mammography screening should avoid using breast cancer mortality trend analysis that does not separate pre- and postscreening incident cases.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Population-level mammography screening effects on breast cancer mortality emerge gradually following screening introduction, resulting in very low statistical power of trend analysis.Researchers and policy makers evaluating mammography screening should avoid relying on population-wide breast cancer mortality trends.Expected mammography screening effects at population level are lower than those from screening trials, as many cases of breast cancer fall outside the screening age range.</p>","PeriodicalId":520707,"journal":{"name":"MDM policy & practice","volume":" ","pages":"23814683221131321"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b8/54/10.1177_23814683221131321.PMC9549205.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MDM policy & practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23814683221131321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background. Several studies have evaluated the effect of mammography screening on breast cancer mortality based on overall breast cancer mortality trends, with varied conclusions. The statistical power of such trend analyses is, however, not carefully studied. Methods. We estimated how the effect of screening on overall breast cancer mortality is likely to unfold. Because a screening effect is based on earlier treatment, screening can affect only new incident cases after screening introduction. To evaluate the likelihood of detecting screening effects on overall breast cancer mortality time trends, we calculated the statistical power of joinpoint regression analysis on breast cancer mortality trends around screening introduction using simulations. Results. We found that a very gradual increase in population-level screening effect is expected due to prescreening incident cases. Assuming 25% effectiveness of a biennial screening program in reducing breast cancer mortality among women 50 to 69 y of age, the expected reduction in overall breast cancer mortality was 3% after 2 y and reached a long-term effect of 18% after 20 y. In common settings, the statistical power to detect any screening effects using joinpoint regression analysis is very low (<50%), even in an artificial setting of constant risk of baseline breast cancer mortality over time. Conclusions. Population effects of screening on breast cancer mortality emerge very gradually and are expected to be considerably lower than the effects reported in trials excluding women diagnosed before screening. Studies of overall breast cancer mortality time trends have too low statistical power to reliably detect screening effects in most populations. Implications. Researchers and policy makers evaluating mammography screening should avoid using breast cancer mortality trend analysis that does not separate pre- and postscreening incident cases.

Highlights: Population-level mammography screening effects on breast cancer mortality emerge gradually following screening introduction, resulting in very low statistical power of trend analysis.Researchers and policy makers evaluating mammography screening should avoid relying on population-wide breast cancer mortality trends.Expected mammography screening effects at population level are lower than those from screening trials, as many cases of breast cancer fall outside the screening age range.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

乳房x光检查引入后乳腺癌死亡率趋势的解释:一项模拟研究。
背景。几项研究根据总体乳腺癌死亡率趋势评估了乳房x光检查对乳腺癌死亡率的影响,得出了不同的结论。然而,这种趋势分析的统计能力并没有得到仔细研究。方法。我们估计了筛查对乳腺癌总体死亡率的影响可能会如何展开。因为筛查的效果是建立在早期治疗的基础上的,所以筛查只能影响到引入筛查后的新病例。为了评估检测筛查效果对总体乳腺癌死亡率时间趋势的可能性,我们使用模拟计算了引入筛查前后乳腺癌死亡率趋势的联合点回归分析的统计能力。结果。我们发现,由于预筛查事件病例,预计人口水平筛查效果会逐渐增加。假设两年一次的筛查项目在降低50岁至69岁女性乳腺癌死亡率方面的有效性为25%,则预期乳腺癌总死亡率在2年后降低3%,在20年后达到18%的长期效果。在一般情况下,使用联合点回归分析检测任何筛查效果的统计能力非常低(结论)。筛查对乳腺癌死亡率的人群影响出现得非常缓慢,预计将大大低于排除筛查前诊断的妇女的试验报告的影响。总体乳腺癌死亡率时间趋势研究的统计能力太低,无法在大多数人群中可靠地检测筛查效果。的影响。评估乳房x光检查的研究人员和政策制定者应该避免使用没有区分筛查前后事件病例的乳腺癌死亡率趋势分析。重点:人群水平的乳房x光筛查对乳腺癌死亡率的影响是在筛查引入后逐渐显现的,趋势分析的统计能力很低。评估乳房x光检查的研究人员和政策制定者应避免依赖于人群范围内的乳腺癌死亡率趋势。预期的乳房x光检查在人群水平上的筛查效果低于筛查试验的效果,因为许多乳腺癌病例超出了筛查年龄范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信