Nerve Transfers for Elbow Reconstruction in Upper and Extended Upper-Type Brachial Plexus Injuries: A Case Series.

Emmanuel P Estrella, Tristram D Montales
{"title":"Nerve Transfers for Elbow Reconstruction in Upper and Extended Upper-Type Brachial Plexus Injuries: A Case Series.","authors":"Emmanuel P Estrella,&nbsp;Tristram D Montales","doi":"10.1227/ons.0000000000000369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nerve transfers for elbow flexion in brachial plexus injuries have been used with increasing frequency because of the higher rate of success and acceptable morbidity. This is especially true in upper and extended upper-type brachial plexus injuries.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To present the clinical outcomes of nerve transfers for elbow flexion in patients with upper and extended upper-type brachial plexus injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort review was done on all patients with upper and extended upper-type brachial plexus injuries from 2006 to 2017, who underwent nerve transfers for the restoration of elbow flexion. Outcome variables include Filipino version of the disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (FIL-DASH) score, elbow flexion strength and range of motion, and pain. All statistical significance was set at P &lt; .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-six patients with nerve transfers to restore elbow flexion were included. There was a significant improvement in FIL-DASH scores in 28 patients after the nerve transfer procedure. Patients with C56 nerve root injuries and those with more than 2 years' follow-up have a higher percentage of regaining ≥M4 elbow flexion strength. Those with double nerve transfers had a higher percentage of ≥M4 elbow flexion strength, greater range of elbow flexion, and better FIL-DASH scores compared with single nerve transfers, but this did not reach statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nerve transfer procedures improve FIL-DASH scores in upper and upper-type brachial plexus injuries. After nerve transfer, stronger elbow flexion can be expected in patients with C56 injuries, and those with longer follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":520730,"journal":{"name":"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":"367-373"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000000369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nerve transfers for elbow flexion in brachial plexus injuries have been used with increasing frequency because of the higher rate of success and acceptable morbidity. This is especially true in upper and extended upper-type brachial plexus injuries.

Objective: To present the clinical outcomes of nerve transfers for elbow flexion in patients with upper and extended upper-type brachial plexus injuries.

Methods: A retrospective cohort review was done on all patients with upper and extended upper-type brachial plexus injuries from 2006 to 2017, who underwent nerve transfers for the restoration of elbow flexion. Outcome variables include Filipino version of the disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (FIL-DASH) score, elbow flexion strength and range of motion, and pain. All statistical significance was set at P < .05.

Results: Fifty-six patients with nerve transfers to restore elbow flexion were included. There was a significant improvement in FIL-DASH scores in 28 patients after the nerve transfer procedure. Patients with C56 nerve root injuries and those with more than 2 years' follow-up have a higher percentage of regaining ≥M4 elbow flexion strength. Those with double nerve transfers had a higher percentage of ≥M4 elbow flexion strength, greater range of elbow flexion, and better FIL-DASH scores compared with single nerve transfers, but this did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusion: Nerve transfer procedures improve FIL-DASH scores in upper and upper-type brachial plexus injuries. After nerve transfer, stronger elbow flexion can be expected in patients with C56 injuries, and those with longer follow-up.

神经转移用于肘关节重建的上臂和延伸型臂丛损伤:一个病例系列。
背景:神经转移治疗臂丛损伤肘关节屈曲的频率越来越高,因为成功率高,发病率可接受。这在上臂神经丛损伤和伸展上臂神经丛损伤中尤其如此。目的:探讨神经转移治疗上臂和伸臂臂丛损伤患者肘关节屈曲的临床效果。方法:回顾性队列分析2006年至2017年所有接受神经转移恢复肘关节屈曲的上肢和伸臂型臂丛损伤患者。结果变量包括菲律宾版手臂、肩膀和手的残疾(FIL-DASH)评分、肘关节屈曲力量和活动范围以及疼痛。P <. 05。结果:本组共56例患者行神经移植恢复肘关节屈曲。神经移植术后28例患者的FIL-DASH评分有显著改善。C56神经根损伤患者和随访超过2年的患者肘关节屈曲强度≥M4的恢复百分比较高。双神经移植组肘关节≥M4屈曲强度百分比、肘关节屈曲范围和FIL-DASH评分均高于单神经移植组,但差异无统计学意义。结论:神经移植可提高上肢和上型臂丛损伤的FIL-DASH评分。神经移植后,C56损伤患者和随访时间较长的患者肘关节屈曲更强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信