Delivering the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: bioethical considerations

Edith Labos, Osvaldo Fustinoni
{"title":"Delivering the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: bioethical considerations","authors":"Edith Labos,&nbsp;Osvaldo Fustinoni","doi":"10.53680/vertex.v33i157.267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Delivering the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease to the patient can cause situations that do not meet the necessary ethical professional standards. We present two cases in which the rash way such a diagnosis was delivered did not respect the principle of nonmaleficence. In both cases the revelation worsened the situation prior to the consultation, causing unfortunate distress to the patient and family. The blunt use of the term “Alzheimer”, together with the insufficient information on the characteristics of the affection, seems to have been the main factor that produced a negative emotional impact, revealing an arrogant professional attitude of ‘absolute’ and unquestionable knowledge, without the necessary equity. A diagnosis of Alzheimer´s should be not only truthful but delivered with caution, above all things avoiding a further damage than that already brought about by the disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":75297,"journal":{"name":"Vertex (Buenos Aires, Argentina)","volume":" ","pages":"56-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vertex (Buenos Aires, Argentina)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53680/vertex.v33i157.267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Delivering the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease to the patient can cause situations that do not meet the necessary ethical professional standards. We present two cases in which the rash way such a diagnosis was delivered did not respect the principle of nonmaleficence. In both cases the revelation worsened the situation prior to the consultation, causing unfortunate distress to the patient and family. The blunt use of the term “Alzheimer”, together with the insufficient information on the characteristics of the affection, seems to have been the main factor that produced a negative emotional impact, revealing an arrogant professional attitude of ‘absolute’ and unquestionable knowledge, without the necessary equity. A diagnosis of Alzheimer´s should be not only truthful but delivered with caution, above all things avoiding a further damage than that already brought about by the disease.

提供阿尔茨海默病的诊断:生物伦理考虑
向患者传达阿尔茨海默病的诊断可能会导致不符合必要的道德专业标准的情况。我们提出的两个情况下,轻率的方式这样的诊断是交付不尊重原则的非恶意。在这两种情况下,在会诊前的情况恶化,给病人和家属造成不幸的痛苦。“阿尔茨海默病”一词的生硬使用,加上对情感特征的信息不足,似乎是产生负面情感影响的主要因素,揭示了一种“绝对”和毫无疑问的知识的傲慢的职业态度,没有必要的公平。对阿尔茨海默氏症的诊断不仅要真实,而且要谨慎,最重要的是要避免在疾病已经带来的伤害之外造成进一步的损害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信