Study of the success rate in bonding attachments with two different composites

Q4 Medicine

L'' Orthodontie française Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1684/orthodfr.2022.92

Pierre Couraud

{"title":"Study of the success rate in bonding attachments with two different composites","authors":"Pierre Couraud","doi":"10.1684/orthodfr.2022.92","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The choice of composite type is an important factor and can affect the success of treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the failure rate of two light-curing composites and to evaluate the effectiveness of each in vivo. The two composites studied were Transbond XT® (3M®) and BracePaste® (American Orthodontics®).Material and method: An analytical, experimental, longitudinal and prospective study was conducted. A sample of 22 patients with a total of 440 teeth was selected. The decemented brackets were considered from the central incisor to the second premolar. A software was used to randomly distribute the type of adhesive according to the right and left side of the patient. Thus, Transbond XT® was used in two quadrants and BracePaste® in the other two. Braces that were not decemented after six mounths were considered successful.Results: Four failures with BracePaste® and three with Transbond XT were observed. These are respectivly 18.2% vs 13.6% among the 22 patients and 0.9% vs 0.7% among the 440 teeth (p>0.05).Discussion: Many studies have tested the efficacy of adhesives in vitro and many have failed to predict in vivo efficacy. Therefore, the aim of our study was interesting.Conclusions: In our sample, no difference in bonding failure was observed between Transbond XT® and BracePaste®.","PeriodicalId":35927,"journal":{"name":"L'' Orthodontie française","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"L'' Orthodontie française","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1684/orthodfr.2022.92","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The choice of composite type is an important factor and can affect the success of treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the failure rate of two light-curing composites and to evaluate the effectiveness of each in vivo. The two composites studied were Transbond XT® (3M®) and BracePaste® (American Orthodontics®).

Material and method: An analytical, experimental, longitudinal and prospective study was conducted. A sample of 22 patients with a total of 440 teeth was selected. The decemented brackets were considered from the central incisor to the second premolar. A software was used to randomly distribute the type of adhesive according to the right and left side of the patient. Thus, Transbond XT® was used in two quadrants and BracePaste® in the other two. Braces that were not decemented after six mounths were considered successful.

Results: Four failures with BracePaste® and three with Transbond XT were observed. These are respectivly 18.2% vs 13.6% among the 22 patients and 0.9% vs 0.7% among the 440 teeth (p>0.05).

Discussion: Many studies have tested the efficacy of adhesives in vitro and many have failed to predict in vivo efficacy. Therefore, the aim of our study was interesting.

Conclusions: In our sample, no difference in bonding failure was observed between Transbond XT® and BracePaste®.

查看原文本刊更多论文

两种不同复合材料粘接附着物成功率的研究

导言:复合型的选择是影响治疗成功与否的重要因素。本研究的目的是比较两种光固化复合材料的失败率，并评估每种光固化复合材料在体内的有效性。所研究的两种复合材料是Transbond XT®(3M®)和BracePaste®(American Orthodontics®)。材料与方法:采用分析性、实验性、纵向和前瞻性研究。选取22例患者，共440颗牙齿。从中门牙到第二前磨牙的降格托槽。使用软件根据患者左右侧随机分配粘接剂类型。因此，在两个象限中使用Transbond XT®，在另外两个象限中使用BracePaste®。6个月后没有降序的牙套被认为是成功的。结果:BracePaste®有4例失败，Transbond XT有3例失败。22例患者分别为18.2%和13.6%，440颗牙分别为0.9%和0.7% (p>0.05)。讨论:许多研究已经测试了粘合剂在体外的功效，许多研究未能预测体内的功效。因此，我们研究的目的是有趣的。结论:在我们的样本中，Transbond XT®和BracePaste®之间的连接失败没有差异。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

L'' Orthodontie française Medicine-Medicine (all)

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： L’Orthodontie Française, organe officiel de communication de la Société Française d’Orthopédie Dento-Faciale, est un journal scientifique de référence depuis 1921, de diffusion internationale, indexé à Medline et référencé à l’Index Medicus et à Bibliodent. Le journal a pour vocation d’accueillir les travaux des membres de la SFODF, des conférenciers ayant communiqué lors des congrès de la Société, ou de tout travail soumis à l’approbation de son comité de rédaction, traitant de l’orthopédie dento-faciale ou de tout sujet en rapport avec cette discipline.