Inconsistency in prevalence of hypertension based on self-reports and use of standard tests: Implications for large scale surveys.

SSM - Population Health Pub Date : 2022-10-03 eCollection Date: 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101255
Shri Kant Singh, Santosh Kumar Sharma, Sanjay K Mohanty, Rakesh Mishra, Akash Porwal, Bal Kishan Gulati
{"title":"Inconsistency in prevalence of hypertension based on self-reports and use of standard tests: Implications for large scale surveys.","authors":"Shri Kant Singh,&nbsp;Santosh Kumar Sharma,&nbsp;Sanjay K Mohanty,&nbsp;Rakesh Mishra,&nbsp;Akash Porwal,&nbsp;Bal Kishan Gulati","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Biomarkers are increasingly integrated into population-based surveys to provide reliable estimates of the prevalence of specific diseases. The Demographic and Health Surveys have recently incorporated blood pressure measurements; however, little is known about the extent of agreement between measured and reported levels of hypertension in India. The objective of this study was to examine the extent of agreement between self-reported hypertension and the results of standard blood pressure measurements, as well as to explore the risk groups and factors associated with inconsistencies in self-reported and biomedically measured hypertension.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Reliability measures such as sensitivity, specificity, and kappa statistics were used to examine inconsistencies in self-reported and biomedically measured hypertension in the National Family Health Survey-4 data. Multilevel logistic models were adopted to analyse the respondent characteristics related to both false-positive and false-negative responses in the survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to biomedically measured hypertension, self-reported hypertension was inconsistent and disproportionate at disaggregated levels in India. While self-reports severely underestimated hypertension among men aged 15-54 years and women aged 35-49 years, it overestimated hypertension among women below the age of 35 years. The inconsistency in self-reported and biomedically examined hypertension had deviations from a sex standpoint. Women aged <35 years reported a false-positive prevalence of hypertension. False-negative responses were elucidated among women aged ≥35 years and men aged 15-54 years. The likelihood of false-positive responses was higher among pregnant and obese respondents, and those who consumed alcohol.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The significant deviance of self-reporting of hypertension from the prevalence derived based on standard tests further indicates the need for adopting standard tests in all emerging future large-scale surveys. A back-check survey is recommended to understand and differentiate the excessive false-positive reporting of hypertension among women aged 15-35 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":506314,"journal":{"name":"SSM - Population Health","volume":" ","pages":"101255"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9547289/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM - Population Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Biomarkers are increasingly integrated into population-based surveys to provide reliable estimates of the prevalence of specific diseases. The Demographic and Health Surveys have recently incorporated blood pressure measurements; however, little is known about the extent of agreement between measured and reported levels of hypertension in India. The objective of this study was to examine the extent of agreement between self-reported hypertension and the results of standard blood pressure measurements, as well as to explore the risk groups and factors associated with inconsistencies in self-reported and biomedically measured hypertension.

Methods: Reliability measures such as sensitivity, specificity, and kappa statistics were used to examine inconsistencies in self-reported and biomedically measured hypertension in the National Family Health Survey-4 data. Multilevel logistic models were adopted to analyse the respondent characteristics related to both false-positive and false-negative responses in the survey.

Results: Compared to biomedically measured hypertension, self-reported hypertension was inconsistent and disproportionate at disaggregated levels in India. While self-reports severely underestimated hypertension among men aged 15-54 years and women aged 35-49 years, it overestimated hypertension among women below the age of 35 years. The inconsistency in self-reported and biomedically examined hypertension had deviations from a sex standpoint. Women aged <35 years reported a false-positive prevalence of hypertension. False-negative responses were elucidated among women aged ≥35 years and men aged 15-54 years. The likelihood of false-positive responses was higher among pregnant and obese respondents, and those who consumed alcohol.

Conclusion: The significant deviance of self-reporting of hypertension from the prevalence derived based on standard tests further indicates the need for adopting standard tests in all emerging future large-scale surveys. A back-check survey is recommended to understand and differentiate the excessive false-positive reporting of hypertension among women aged 15-35 years.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于自我报告和使用标准测试的高血压患病率的不一致性:对大规模调查的影响
目的:生物标志物越来越多地被纳入基于人群的调查,以提供对特定疾病患病率的可靠估计。人口与健康调查最近纳入了血压测量;然而,人们对印度测量的高血压水平和报告的高血压水平之间的一致程度知之甚少。本研究的目的是检查自我报告的高血压和标准血压测量结果之间的一致程度,并探讨与自我报告和生物医学测量的高血压不一致相关的危险群体和因素。方法:采用灵敏度、特异性和kappa统计等可靠性测量来检验国家家庭健康调查4数据中自我报告和生物医学测量的高血压的不一致性。采用多层逻辑模型分析调查中与假阳性和假阴性回答相关的被调查者特征。结果:与生物医学测量的高血压相比,自我报告的高血压在印度的分类水平上是不一致和不成比例的。虽然自我报告严重低估了15-54岁男性和35-49岁女性的高血压,但高估了35岁以下女性的高血压。自我报告和生物医学检查高血压的不一致性从性别角度来看存在偏差。结论:高血压自我报告与基于标准测试得出的患病率存在显著偏差,进一步表明在未来所有新兴的大规模调查中都需要采用标准测试。建议进行反向调查,以了解和区分15-35岁女性高血压的过度假阳性报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信