Differences in clinical signs and severity of intoxication due to street drugs in adolescents and young adults treated in emergency departments.

Guillermo Burillo-Putze, Dima Ibrahim-Achi, Lidia Martínez-Sánchez, Miguel Galicia, August Supervía, Jordi Puiguriguer Ferrando, Sebastián Matos Castro, María Ángeles Leciñena, M ª José Venegas de L'Hotellerie, Belén Rodríguez Miranda, Ángel Bajo Bajo, Beatriz Martín-Pérez, Antonio Dueñas-Laita, Ana Ferrer Dufol, Francisco Callado-Moro, Santiago Nogué-Xarau, Òscar Miró
{"title":"Differences in clinical signs and severity of intoxication due to street drugs in adolescents and young adults treated in emergency departments.","authors":"Guillermo Burillo-Putze,&nbsp;Dima Ibrahim-Achi,&nbsp;Lidia Martínez-Sánchez,&nbsp;Miguel Galicia,&nbsp;August Supervía,&nbsp;Jordi Puiguriguer Ferrando,&nbsp;Sebastián Matos Castro,&nbsp;María Ángeles Leciñena,&nbsp;M ª José Venegas de L'Hotellerie,&nbsp;Belén Rodríguez Miranda,&nbsp;Ángel Bajo Bajo,&nbsp;Beatriz Martín-Pérez,&nbsp;Antonio Dueñas-Laita,&nbsp;Ana Ferrer Dufol,&nbsp;Francisco Callado-Moro,&nbsp;Santiago Nogué-Xarau,&nbsp;Òscar Miró","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine whether symptoms and levels of severity of intoxication from street drugs differ between adolescents and young adults who come to hospital emergency departments for treatment.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We studied a consecutive cohort of adolescents (aged 12-17 years) and young adults (aged 18-30 years) who were treated in 11 hospital emergency departments belonging to the Drug Abuse Network of Spanish Hospital Emergency Departments (REDURHE). Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and level of severity were recorded for comparison between between adolescents and young adults, adjusted for sex, alcohol co-ingestion, and type of drug used. An intoxication was recorded as severe if at least 1 of the following indicators was present: cardiac arrest, tracheal intubation, intensive care unit admission, and in-hospital death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included a total of 2181 patients: 249 adolescents (11.4%) and 1932 young adults (88.6%). Alcohol coingestion and use of multiple drugs were less common in adolescents, who had significantly more events related to cannabis (in 81.1% vs 49.0% of young adults) and benzodiazepines (13.3% vs 5.5%). The adolescents had significantly fewer intoxications from the use of cocaine (10.8% vs 45.1%), amphetamines (17.3% vs 32.3%), ketamine (0.4% vs 6.0%) and gamma-hydroxybutyrate (0.4% vs 4.0%). A higher proportion of adolescents than young adults presented with diminished consciousness (23.0% vs 16.9%), but fewer manifested anxiety (15.9% vs 26.3%), palpitations (11.0% vs 19.5%), or chest pain (2.8% vs 9.2%). The pattern of associations was similar in the subgroup of intoxications due to cannabis. The adjusted model confirmed that the adolescents were more likely to have diminished consciousness, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.851 (95% CI, 1.204-2.844) and less likely to have anxiety (OR, 0.529 (95% CI, 0.347-0.807). Intoxication was severe in 46 patients overall (2.1%); in adolescents and young adults the proportions were 0.8% and 2.3%, respectively (P = 0.129). In adolescents, the OR was 0.568 (95% CI, 0.131-2.468) for severity; for component indicators, the ORs were 0.494 (95% CI, 0.063-3.892) for intubation and 0.780 (95% CI, 0.175-3.475) for intensive care unit admission. No deaths occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adolescents requiring emergency care for street drug intoxication had co-ingested alcohol or taken multiple drugs less often than young adults. Cannabis was the drug most often used by adolescents, who presented more often with diminished consciousness but less often with anxiety. We detected no differences related to event severity.</p>","PeriodicalId":11644,"journal":{"name":"Emergencias : revista de la Sociedad Espanola de Medicina de Emergencias","volume":" ","pages":"352-360"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergencias : revista de la Sociedad Espanola de Medicina de Emergencias","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To determine whether symptoms and levels of severity of intoxication from street drugs differ between adolescents and young adults who come to hospital emergency departments for treatment.

Material and methods: We studied a consecutive cohort of adolescents (aged 12-17 years) and young adults (aged 18-30 years) who were treated in 11 hospital emergency departments belonging to the Drug Abuse Network of Spanish Hospital Emergency Departments (REDURHE). Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and level of severity were recorded for comparison between between adolescents and young adults, adjusted for sex, alcohol co-ingestion, and type of drug used. An intoxication was recorded as severe if at least 1 of the following indicators was present: cardiac arrest, tracheal intubation, intensive care unit admission, and in-hospital death.

Results: We included a total of 2181 patients: 249 adolescents (11.4%) and 1932 young adults (88.6%). Alcohol coingestion and use of multiple drugs were less common in adolescents, who had significantly more events related to cannabis (in 81.1% vs 49.0% of young adults) and benzodiazepines (13.3% vs 5.5%). The adolescents had significantly fewer intoxications from the use of cocaine (10.8% vs 45.1%), amphetamines (17.3% vs 32.3%), ketamine (0.4% vs 6.0%) and gamma-hydroxybutyrate (0.4% vs 4.0%). A higher proportion of adolescents than young adults presented with diminished consciousness (23.0% vs 16.9%), but fewer manifested anxiety (15.9% vs 26.3%), palpitations (11.0% vs 19.5%), or chest pain (2.8% vs 9.2%). The pattern of associations was similar in the subgroup of intoxications due to cannabis. The adjusted model confirmed that the adolescents were more likely to have diminished consciousness, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.851 (95% CI, 1.204-2.844) and less likely to have anxiety (OR, 0.529 (95% CI, 0.347-0.807). Intoxication was severe in 46 patients overall (2.1%); in adolescents and young adults the proportions were 0.8% and 2.3%, respectively (P = 0.129). In adolescents, the OR was 0.568 (95% CI, 0.131-2.468) for severity; for component indicators, the ORs were 0.494 (95% CI, 0.063-3.892) for intubation and 0.780 (95% CI, 0.175-3.475) for intensive care unit admission. No deaths occurred.

Conclusion: Adolescents requiring emergency care for street drug intoxication had co-ingested alcohol or taken multiple drugs less often than young adults. Cannabis was the drug most often used by adolescents, who presented more often with diminished consciousness but less often with anxiety. We detected no differences related to event severity.

在急诊科接受治疗的青少年和青壮年街头毒品中毒的临床症状和严重程度的差异
目的:确定街头毒品中毒的症状和严重程度在来医院急诊科治疗的青少年和年轻人之间是否存在差异。材料和方法:我们研究了在西班牙医院急诊科药物滥用网络(REDURHE)所属的11家医院急诊科接受治疗的青少年(12-17岁)和年轻人(18-30岁)的连续队列。记录社会人口学和临床特征以及严重程度,以便在青少年和年轻人之间进行比较,并根据性别、酒精共摄入和使用药物类型进行调整。如果出现以下至少1项指标,则记录为严重中毒:心脏骤停、气管插管、重症监护病房住院和院内死亡。结果:我们共纳入2181例患者:249例青少年(11.4%)和1932例青年(88.6%)。青少年中饮酒和使用多种药物的情况较少见,他们与大麻(81.1%对49.0%的年轻人)和苯二氮卓类药物(13.3%对5.5%)相关的事件明显更多。青少年因使用可卡因(10.8%对45.1%)、安非他命(17.3%对32.3%)、氯胺酮(0.4%对6.0%)和-羟基丁酸盐(0.4%对4.0%)而中毒的人数明显减少。青少年表现为意识减退的比例高于年轻人(23.0%比16.9%),但表现为焦虑(15.9%比26.3%)、心悸(11.0%比19.5%)或胸痛(2.8%比9.2%)的比例较少。这种关联模式在大麻中毒亚组中是相似的。调整后的模型证实,青少年更有可能意识减弱,比值比(OR)为1.851 (95% CI, 1.204-2.844),焦虑的可能性更小(OR, 0.529 (95% CI, 0.347-0.807)。46例患者严重中毒(2.1%);青少年和青壮年分别为0.8%和2.3% (P = 0.129)。在青少年中,严重性的OR为0.568 (95% CI, 0.131-2.468);对于组成指标,插管的or值为0.494 (95% CI, 0.063-3.892),重症监护病房入院的or值为0.780 (95% CI, 0.175-3.475)。没有人员死亡。结论:需要紧急护理的街头毒品中毒青少年与年轻人相比,同时摄入酒精或服用多种药物的频率较低。大麻是青少年最常使用的药物,他们更常表现为意识减弱,但较少表现为焦虑。我们没有发现与事件严重程度相关的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信