Measuring the response to visually presented faces in the human lateral prefrontal cortex.

Cerebral cortex communications Pub Date : 2022-08-18 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1093/texcom/tgac036
Lara Nikel, Magdalena W Sliwinska, Emel Kucuk, Leslie G Ungerleider, David Pitcher
{"title":"Measuring the response to visually presented faces in the human lateral prefrontal cortex.","authors":"Lara Nikel,&nbsp;Magdalena W Sliwinska,&nbsp;Emel Kucuk,&nbsp;Leslie G Ungerleider,&nbsp;David Pitcher","doi":"10.1093/texcom/tgac036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neuroimaging studies identify multiple face-selective areas in the human brain. In the current study, we compared the functional response of the face area in the lateral prefrontal cortex to that of other face-selective areas. In Experiment 1, participants (<i>n</i> = 32) were scanned viewing videos containing faces, bodies, scenes, objects, and scrambled objects. We identified a face-selective area in the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG). In Experiment 2, participants (<i>n</i> = 24) viewed the same videos or static images. Results showed that the rIFG, right posterior superior temporal sulcus (rpSTS), and right occipital face area (rOFA) exhibited a greater response to moving than static faces. In Experiment 3, participants (<i>n</i> = 18) viewed face videos in the contralateral and ipsilateral visual fields. Results showed that the rIFG and rpSTS showed no visual field bias, while the rOFA and right fusiform face area (rFFA) showed a contralateral bias. These experiments suggest two conclusions; firstly, in all three experiments, the face area in the IFG was not as reliably identified as face areas in the occipitotemporal cortex. Secondly, the similarity of the response profiles in the IFG and pSTS suggests the areas may perform similar cognitive functions, a conclusion consistent with prior neuroanatomical and functional connectivity evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":72551,"journal":{"name":"Cerebral cortex communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9491845/pdf/","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebral cortex communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/texcom/tgac036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Neuroimaging studies identify multiple face-selective areas in the human brain. In the current study, we compared the functional response of the face area in the lateral prefrontal cortex to that of other face-selective areas. In Experiment 1, participants (n = 32) were scanned viewing videos containing faces, bodies, scenes, objects, and scrambled objects. We identified a face-selective area in the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG). In Experiment 2, participants (n = 24) viewed the same videos or static images. Results showed that the rIFG, right posterior superior temporal sulcus (rpSTS), and right occipital face area (rOFA) exhibited a greater response to moving than static faces. In Experiment 3, participants (n = 18) viewed face videos in the contralateral and ipsilateral visual fields. Results showed that the rIFG and rpSTS showed no visual field bias, while the rOFA and right fusiform face area (rFFA) showed a contralateral bias. These experiments suggest two conclusions; firstly, in all three experiments, the face area in the IFG was not as reliably identified as face areas in the occipitotemporal cortex. Secondly, the similarity of the response profiles in the IFG and pSTS suggests the areas may perform similar cognitive functions, a conclusion consistent with prior neuroanatomical and functional connectivity evidence.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

测量人类外侧前额皮质对视觉呈现的面孔的反应。
神经影像学研究发现人类大脑中有多个选择面部的区域。在本研究中,我们比较了外侧前额皮质中面部区域的功能反应与其他面部选择区域的功能反应。在实验1中,参与者(n = 32)被扫描观看包含人脸、身体、场景、物体和杂乱物体的视频。我们在右侧额下回(rIFG)中发现了一个面部选择区域。在实验2中,参与者(n = 24)观看相同的视频或静态图像。结果表明,右颞后上沟(rpSTS)和右枕面区(rOFA)对移动面部的响应大于静态面部。在实验3中,参与者(n = 18)在对侧和同侧视野中观看人脸视频。结果显示,rIFG和rpSTS无视野偏倚,rOFA和右梭状面区(rFFA)有对侧偏倚。这些实验提出了两个结论;首先,在所有三个实验中,IFG中的面部区域并不像枕颞皮质中的面部区域那样可靠。其次,IFG和pSTS反应谱的相似性表明,这两个区域可能执行类似的认知功能,这一结论与先前的神经解剖学和功能连通性证据一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信