The barriers and opportunities to support the early career academics and professionals in human factors/ergonomics - revisiting reflections from IEA2015, IEA2018 & IEA2021.

Sadeem Munawar Qureshi, Jonathan Davy, Katie Buckley
{"title":"The barriers and opportunities to support the early career academics and professionals in human factors/ergonomics - revisiting reflections from IEA2015, IEA2018 & IEA2021.","authors":"Sadeem Munawar Qureshi,&nbsp;Jonathan Davy,&nbsp;Katie Buckley","doi":"10.3233/WOR-211216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Early-Career Community (ECC) comprises researchers, practitioners, and professionals in their \"early-career\" stages in the Human Factors/Ergonomics (HFE) profession. Early-career HFE professionals are essential to both current industry decision making and future growth of our profession.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This paper provides detailed insights into the barriers and suggestions to support engagement with ECC within the International Ergonomics Association (IEA) and its Federated Societies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This report integrates key findings from the formal and informal discussions that occurred with diverse groups of stakeholders (n > 100) at IEA2015, IEA2018 and IEA2021 guided by the participatory inquiry paradigm, cooperative action-inquiry and participatory ergonomics approaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Barriers to support ECC include: a lack of employment opportunities, poor general awareness and integration of HFE in existing university-courses, financial constraints, inclusivity challenges and a lack of Influence in decision-making. While some of the more systemic challenges are context-specific and cannot be overcome, ECCs suggested that: the IEA and its Federated Societies include ECC members as part of their boards; a Standing Committee for the ECCs be established as part of the IEA; make use of social-media more effectively to engage the ECC. More mentorship, networking, knowledge sharing, training and education, combined with financial-support will ensure that the ECC can participate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ECC members experience complex and dynamic challenges that affect their development and involvement in the broader HFE profession. It is therefore critical that appropriate, global, national and local strategies are developed to continue to support and develop the ECC to ensure the continued growth of and demand for HFE.</p>","PeriodicalId":319034,"journal":{"name":"Work (Reading, Mass.)","volume":" ","pages":"S67-S80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work (Reading, Mass.)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-211216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Early-Career Community (ECC) comprises researchers, practitioners, and professionals in their "early-career" stages in the Human Factors/Ergonomics (HFE) profession. Early-career HFE professionals are essential to both current industry decision making and future growth of our profession.

Objective: This paper provides detailed insights into the barriers and suggestions to support engagement with ECC within the International Ergonomics Association (IEA) and its Federated Societies.

Methods: This report integrates key findings from the formal and informal discussions that occurred with diverse groups of stakeholders (n > 100) at IEA2015, IEA2018 and IEA2021 guided by the participatory inquiry paradigm, cooperative action-inquiry and participatory ergonomics approaches.

Results: Barriers to support ECC include: a lack of employment opportunities, poor general awareness and integration of HFE in existing university-courses, financial constraints, inclusivity challenges and a lack of Influence in decision-making. While some of the more systemic challenges are context-specific and cannot be overcome, ECCs suggested that: the IEA and its Federated Societies include ECC members as part of their boards; a Standing Committee for the ECCs be established as part of the IEA; make use of social-media more effectively to engage the ECC. More mentorship, networking, knowledge sharing, training and education, combined with financial-support will ensure that the ECC can participate.

Conclusion: ECC members experience complex and dynamic challenges that affect their development and involvement in the broader HFE profession. It is therefore critical that appropriate, global, national and local strategies are developed to continue to support and develop the ECC to ensure the continued growth of and demand for HFE.

支持人因/人体工程学早期职业学者和专业人士的障碍和机会——回顾IEA2015、IEA2018和IEA2021的反思。
背景:早期职业社区(ECC)由人类因素/人体工程学(HFE)专业的研究人员、实践者和处于“早期职业”阶段的专业人士组成。职业生涯早期的HFE专业人士对当前的行业决策和我们职业的未来发展都至关重要。目的:本文提供了国际人体工程学协会(IEA)及其联盟协会中支持ECC参与的障碍和建议的详细见解。方法:本报告整合了在参与式探究范式、合作行动探究和参与式人体工程学方法的指导下,在IEA2015、IEA2018和IEA2021上与不同利益相关者群体(n > 100)进行的正式和非正式讨论的主要结果。结果:支持ECC的障碍包括:缺乏就业机会,缺乏对现有大学课程中HFE的普遍认识和整合,财务约束,包容性挑战以及在决策中缺乏影响力。虽然一些更系统性的挑战是具体情况下无法克服的,但ECC建议:国际能源署及其联合会将ECC成员纳入其董事会;设立环境协调委员会常设委员会,作为国际能源机构的一部分;更有效地利用社交媒体与投诉投诉委员会接触。更多的指导、网络、知识共享、培训和教育,加上财政支持,将确保环保会能够参与其中。结论:ECC成员经历复杂和动态的挑战,影响他们的发展和参与更广泛的HFE专业。因此,至关重要的是制定适当的全球、国家和地方战略,继续支持和发展ECC,以确保HFE的持续增长和需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信